Literature DB >> 27059614

Examining clinical outcomes utilizing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Cody R Christensen1, Thomas K Maatman2,3, Thomas J Maatman2,3,4, Tony T Tran2.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of performing RARP utilizing LPP 12 mmHg with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Utilizing the Metro Health RALP database registry and the Michigan Urological Clinic records, we retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive RALPs performed between December 2012 and March 2015 by a single robotic surgeon. 100 patients underwent RARP utilizing 15 mmHg of standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) and 100 patients underwent RALP utilizing 12 mmHg lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP). Intraoperative parameters reviewed included operative time (OT) and blood loss (BL). Postoperative parameters reviewed included length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative ileus, fistulas, urinary retention and hematoma formation. Surgical outcomes reviewed included pathological stage and combined Gleason score. Patient age, BMI, mean combined Gleason score and pathological stage were similar in both groups. Mean OT for the LPP group was 105.49 (66-166) and for the standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) group 111.31 (61-231) min. The length of stay in both groups was similar, averaging 1.53 (1-6) days for the LPP group and 1.57 (1-6) days for the SPP group. The LPP group had a lower postop ileus rate of 4 vs 8 % in the SPP group, but they were not statistically different. Likewise, the positive margin rate, readmission rate, hematoma rate, retention rate and urinary fistula rate were similar and not statistically different for both groups. Pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg is noninferior to 15 mmHg during RARP and does not alter the clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pneumoperitoneum; Robotic prostatectomy; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059614     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0570-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  10 in total

1.  The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Neudecker; S Sauerland; E Neugebauer; R Bergamaschi; H J Bonjer; A Cuschieri; K-H Fuchs; Ch Jacobi; F W Jansen; A-M Koivusalo; A Lacy; M J McMahon; B Millat; W Schwenk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prolonged pneumoperitoneum at 15 mmHg causes lactic acidosis.

Authors:  P Taura; A Lopez; A M Lacy; T Anglada; J Beltran; L Fernandez-Cruz; E Targarona; J C Garcia-Valdecasas; J L Marin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 4.  Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Hua; Jian Gong; Le Yao; Bo Zhou; Zhenshun Song
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy.

Authors:  M K Schilling; C Redaelli; L Krähenbühl; C Signer; M W Büchler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy.

Authors:  L Sarli; R Costi; G Sansebastiano; M Trivelli; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Splanchnic mucosal ischemia: an unrecognized consequence of routine pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  M A Windsor; M J Bonham; M Rumball
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-12

8.  Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study.

Authors:  I R A M Mertens zur Borg; A Lim; S J C Verbrugge; J N M IJzermans; J Klein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum: impact of body habitus.

Authors:  E M McDougall; R S Figenshau; R V Clayman; T G Monk; D S Smith
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-12

10.  Hemodynamic changes during robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vanlal Darlong; Nishad Poolayullathil Kunhabdulla; Ravindra Pandey; Jyotsna Punj; Rakesh Garg; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-07
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Mustafa Gürkan Yenice; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-04-03

2.  Clinical outcomes of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive urological surgery.

Authors:  Alexander West; John Hayes; Darryl Ethan Bernstein; Mahesh Krishnamoorthy; Steven Lathers; Gary Tegan; Jeremy Teoh; Prokar Dasgupta; Karel Decaestecker; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-30

3.  The effect of different levels of pneumoperitoneum pressures on regional cerebral oxygenation during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Authors:  Arzu Karaveli; Ali Sait Kavaklı; Murat Özçelik; Mutlu Ateş; Kerem İnanoğlu; Sadık Özmen
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.