Literature DB >> 27059248

Changes in Manipulative Peak Force Modulation and Time to Peak Thrust among First-Year Chiropractic Students Following a 12-Week Detraining Period.

David J Starmer1, Brett P Guist2, Taylor R Tuff3, Sarah C Warren4, Matthew G R Williams5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in peak force modulation and time-to-peak thrust in posterior-to-anterior (PA) high-velocity-low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulations in first-year chiropractic students prior to and following a 12-week detraining period.
METHODS: Chiropractic students (n=125) performed 2 thrusts prior to and following a 12-week detraining period: total peak force targets were 400 and 600 N, on a force-sensing table using a PA hand contact of the participant's choice (bilateral hypothenar, bilateral thenar, or cross bilateral). Force modulation was compared to defined target total peak force values of 600 and 400 N, and time-to-peak thrust was compared between data sets using 2-tailed paired t-tests.
RESULTS: Total peak force for the 600 N intensity varied by 124.11 + 65.77 N during the pre-test and 123.29 + 61.43 N during the post-test compared to the defined target of 600 N (P = .90); total peak force for the 400 N intensity varied by 44.91 + 34.67 N during the pre-test and 44.60 + 32.63 N during the post-test compared to the defined target of 400 N (P = .57). Time-to-peak thrust for the 400 N total peak force was 137.094 + 42.47 milliseconds during the pre-test and 125.385 + 37.46 milliseconds during the post-test (P = .0004); time-to-peak thrust for the 600 N total peak force was 136.835 + 40.48 milliseconds during the pre-test and 125.385 + 33.78 milliseconds during the post-test (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate no drop-off in the ability to modulate force for either thrust intensity, but did indicate a statistically significant change in time-to-peak thrust for the 400 N total peak force thrust intensity in first-year chiropractic students following a 12-week detraining period.
Copyright © 2016 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiropractic; Force; Manipulation, Spinal; Motor Skills; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059248     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

1.  Effects of an 8-week physical exercise program on spinal manipulation biomechanical parameters in a group of 1st-year chiropractic students.

Authors:  Arnaud Lardon; Mégane Pasquier; Yannick Audo; Florian Barbier-Cazorla; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 2.  Spinal manipulation frequency and dosage effects on clinical and physiological outcomes: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mégane Pasquier; Catherine Daneau; Andrée-Anne Marchand; Arnaud Lardon; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-05-22

Review 3.  Devices Used to Measure Force-Time Characteristics of Spinal Manipulations and Mobilizations: A Mixed-Methods Scoping Review on Metrologic Properties and Factors Influencing Use.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Mercier; Philippe Rousseau; Martha Funabashi; Martin Descarreaux; Isabelle Pagé
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.