Literature DB >> 27058883

Dosing recommendations for pharmacogenetic interactions related to drug metabolism.

Kelly K Filipski1, Michael A Pacanowski, Anuradha Ramamoorthy, William Gregory Feero, Andrew N Freedman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacogenomic studies have established the important contribution of drug-metabolizing enzyme genotype toward drug toxicity and treatment failure; however, clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics has been slow. The aim of this study was to systematically review the information on drug-metabolizing enzyme pharmacogenomics available in the US drug labeling, practice guidelines, and recommendations.
METHODS: Drug-metabolizing enzyme genotype and phenotype information was assessed in US FDA drug labeling, clinical practice guidelines, and independent technology assessors to evaluate the consistency in information sources for healthcare providers.
RESULTS: Eighty four gene-drug pairs were identified as having drug-metabolizing enzyme genotype or phenotype information within the label. The manner in which pharmacogenomic information was presented was heterogeneous both within the label and between clinical practice recommendations.
CONCLUSION: For proper implementation of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice, information sources for healthcare providers should relay consistent and clear information for the appropriate use of biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27058883     DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in pharmacogenomics: from gene regulation to patient stratification.

Authors:  Alexandr A Kalinin; Gerald A Higgins; Narathip Reamaroon; Sayedmohammadreza Soroushmehr; Ari Allyn-Feuer; Ivo D Dinov; Kayvan Najarian; Brian D Athey
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Comparison of clinical pharmacogenetic recommendations across therapeutic areas.

Authors:  Tyler Shugg; Amy L Pasternak; Jasmine A Luzum
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use.

Authors:  Lauren Chin; Beth Devine; Sarah Baradaran; Katelyn Keyloun; William Canestaro; Jonathan Pham
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2017-07-26

4.  Comparison of FDA Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines.

Authors:  Daryl Pritchard; Jai N Patel; Lindsay E Stephens; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Addressing the inter-individual variation in response to consumption of plant food bioactives: Towards a better understanding of their role in healthy aging and cardiometabolic risk reduction.

Authors:  Claudine Manach; Dragan Milenkovic; Tom Van de Wiele; Ana Rodriguez-Mateos; Baukje de Roos; Maria Teresa Garcia-Conesa; Rikard Landberg; Eileen R Gibney; Marina Heinonen; Francisco Tomás-Barberán; Christine Morand
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 6.  Updating the landscape of direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  Kelly K Filipski; John D Murphy; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2017-08-22

7.  Prevalence and types of inconsistencies in clinical pharmacogenetic recommendations among major U.S. sources.

Authors:  Tyler Shugg; Amy L Pasternak; Bianca London; Jasmine A Luzum
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 8.617

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.