John A Staples1,2,3, Jin Wang3, Mark C Zaros2, Gregory J Jurkovich4, Frederick P Rivara3,5. 1. a Department of Medicine , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada. 2. b Department of Medicine , University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA. 3. c Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center , Seattle , WA , USA. 4. d Department of Surgery , University of Colorado , Denver , CO , USA. 5. e Department of Pediatrics , University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) prognostic models in older patients. METHODS: Using data from the National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT), this study identified adult patients presenting to US hospitals in 2001 and 2002 with non-penetrating moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (GCS ≤ 12). IMPACT model calibration and discrimination in the older stratum (65-84 years) was compared to that in the younger stratum (18-64 years). RESULTS: IMPACT model discrimination did not differ significantly between the older (n = 202; weighted n = 268) and younger strata (n = 613; weighted n = 1632) and was generally adequate (c-statistic for the core-death model = 0.81 [0.77-0.84] vs 0.75 [0.66-0.84], respectively; p = 0.26). IMPACT model calibration was poor for both older and younger strata (Hosmer-Lemeshow p-value for the core-death model = 0.01 vs < 0.0001, respectively). Pre-specified qualitative graphical evaluation suggested substantial under-prediction of mortality in the oldest decades of life, but not among younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: The examined IMPACT prognostic models demonstrated adequate discrimination and poor calibration in both older and younger patients, yet particular caution may be required when applying these models to the elderly.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) prognostic models in older patients. METHODS: Using data from the National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT), this study identified adult patients presenting to US hospitals in 2001 and 2002 with non-penetrating moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (GCS ≤ 12). IMPACT model calibration and discrimination in the older stratum (65-84 years) was compared to that in the younger stratum (18-64 years). RESULTS: IMPACT model discrimination did not differ significantly between the older (n = 202; weighted n = 268) and younger strata (n = 613; weighted n = 1632) and was generally adequate (c-statistic for the core-death model = 0.81 [0.77-0.84] vs 0.75 [0.66-0.84], respectively; p = 0.26). IMPACT model calibration was poor for both older and younger strata (Hosmer-Lemeshow p-value for the core-death model = 0.01 vs < 0.0001, respectively). Pre-specified qualitative graphical evaluation suggested substantial under-prediction of mortality in the oldest decades of life, but not among younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: The examined IMPACT prognostic models demonstrated adequate discrimination and poor calibration in both older and younger patients, yet particular caution may be required when applying these models to the elderly.
Authors: Matthew E Peters; Michael Hsu; Vani Rao; Durga Roy; Bharat R Narapareddy; Kathleen T Bechtold; Haris I Sair; Timothy E Van Meter; Hayley Falk; Anna J Hall; Constantine G Lyketsos; Frederick K Korley Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Kevin Agyemang; Anna Rose; Saira Baig; Laulwa Al Salloum; Aimen Ahmed Osman; Felix Steckler; Christopher Barrett Journal: Interdiscip Neurosurg Date: 2021-08-19