Arsalaan A Salehani1, Griffin R Baum1, Brian M Howard1, Christopher M Holland1, Faiz U Ahmad2. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: faiz.ahmad@emory.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Double, noncontiguous, 3-column spinal injuries are a rare phenomenon most often caused by high-energy trauma. The resulting multilevel, fracture-dislocation injuries represent 2 separate 3-column lesions and produce a floating spine segment between the 2 fracture dislocation sites. Only a few cases of these rare, posttraumatic injuries have been reported previously; however, all of these included a combination of injuries in the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spine. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the first report of a case of double-level spinal injury isolated to the thoracic spine, with an intermediate floating spinal segment in a 48-year-old man after a 30-foot fall. In our case, the standard 3 above and 2 below pedicle instrumentation was not sufficient to stabilize the thoracic spine. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the evaluation and surgical management of these fractures and discuss how a standard "3 above-2 below" approach may not be sufficient to stabilize these unstable injuries. In the case of severe, noncontiguous double chance fractures of the spine, we recommend a more extensive anteroposterior approach to reduce the risk of hardware failure and worsening spinal deformity.
BACKGROUND: Double, noncontiguous, 3-column spinal injuries are a rare phenomenon most often caused by high-energy trauma. The resulting multilevel, fracture-dislocation injuries represent 2 separate 3-column lesions and produce a floating spine segment between the 2 fracture dislocation sites. Only a few cases of these rare, posttraumatic injuries have been reported previously; however, all of these included a combination of injuries in the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spine. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the first report of a case of double-level spinal injury isolated to the thoracic spine, with an intermediate floating spinal segment in a 48-year-old man after a 30-foot fall. In our case, the standard 3 above and 2 below pedicle instrumentation was not sufficient to stabilize the thoracic spine. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the evaluation and surgical management of these fractures and discuss how a standard "3 above-2 below" approach may not be sufficient to stabilize these unstable injuries. In the case of severe, noncontiguous double chance fractures of the spine, we recommend a more extensive anteroposterior approach to reduce the risk of hardware failure and worsening spinal deformity.
Authors: Taylor Waitt; Vamsi Reddy; Dayton Grogan; Pearce Lane; Joseph Kilianski; John DeVine; Alexander Post Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2020-06-13