Scott R Akers1, Thomas J Werner, Domenico Rubello, Abass Alavi, Gang Cheng. 1. aDepartment of Radiology, Philadelphia VA Medical Center bDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA cDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, Radiology, Interventional Radiology NeuroRadiology, Medical Physics, Clinical Laboratory, Biomarkers Laboratory, Pathology, Microbiology, 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether compromised renal function has an effect on the uptake and clearance of 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose (F-FDG) in normal tissues on F-FDG PET/CT imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of their renal function status: 25 patients with normal renal function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)>90 ml/min], 21 patients with mildly compromised renal function (90≥eGFR≥60 ml/min), and 12 patients with moderate or severe compromised renal function (eGFR<60 ml/min). All patients underwent F-FDG PET/CT imaging at 1, 2, and 3 h after tracer injection. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were obtained in regions of interest for multiple tissue types. RESULTS: Serial SUV values from 1 to 3 h were measured for different tissues including the aortic blood pool, liver, spleen, lung, lymph nodes, and skeletal muscles. The SUV values of F-FDG uptake showed significantly decreased activity from 1 to 2 h as well as from 2 to 3 h for each tissue type, irrespective of renal function. There was no significant difference in SUVmean values between patients with normal and compromised renal functions, which was consistently observed for each tissue type and at each time point. In fact, the variance in individual SUV values within a group was more than the variance of SUV means between the groups with different renal functions for all tissue types and at 1-, 2-, or 3-h time points. Finally, the lack of dependence of SUV values in normal tissues on renal function is shown by very low r values when comparing SUV and eGFR. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that compromised renal function does not significantly compromise clearance of background activity of F-FDG PET imaging. As a result, adjustment of F-FDG dose or imaging time is not necessary in renal-impaired patients to achieve optimal imaging.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether compromised renal function has an effect on the uptake and clearance of 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose (F-FDG) in normal tissues on F-FDG PET/CT imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of their renal function status: 25 patients with normal renal function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)>90 ml/min], 21 patients with mildly compromised renal function (90≥eGFR≥60 ml/min), and 12 patients with moderate or severe compromised renal function (eGFR<60 ml/min). All patients underwent F-FDG PET/CT imaging at 1, 2, and 3 h after tracer injection. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were obtained in regions of interest for multiple tissue types. RESULTS: Serial SUV values from 1 to 3 h were measured for different tissues including the aortic blood pool, liver, spleen, lung, lymph nodes, and skeletal muscles. The SUV values of F-FDG uptake showed significantly decreased activity from 1 to 2 h as well as from 2 to 3 h for each tissue type, irrespective of renal function. There was no significant difference in SUVmean values between patients with normal and compromised renal functions, which was consistently observed for each tissue type and at each time point. In fact, the variance in individual SUV values within a group was more than the variance of SUV means between the groups with different renal functions for all tissue types and at 1-, 2-, or 3-h time points. Finally, the lack of dependence of SUV values in normal tissues on renal function is shown by very low r values when comparing SUV and eGFR. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that compromised renal function does not significantly compromise clearance of background activity of F-FDG PET imaging. As a result, adjustment of F-FDG dose or imaging time is not necessary in renal-impairedpatients to achieve optimal imaging.
Authors: Julian M M Rogasch; Frank Hofheinz; Lutz van Heek; Conrad-Amadeus Voltin; Ronald Boellaard; Carsten Kobe Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-02-10
Authors: Austin J Borja; Emily C Hancin; Alexandra D Dreyfuss; Vincent Zhang; Toby Mathew; Chaitanya Rojulpote; Thomas J Werner; Shivaraj Patil; Karthik Gonuguntla; Alexander Lin; Steven J Feigenberg; Samuel Swisher-McClure; Abass Alavi; Mona-Elisabeth Revheim Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Ellen Boswijk; Karin J C Sanders; Evie P M Broeders; Marlies de Ligt; Guy H E J Vijgen; Bas Havekes; Alma M A Mingels; Roel Wierts; Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt; Patrick Schrauwen; Felix M Mottaghy; Joachim E Wildberger; Jan Bucerius Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 9.236