Literature DB >> 27058251

The Healthcare Improvement Scotland evidence note rapid review process: providing timely, reliable evidence to inform imperative decisions on healthcare.

Heather M McIntosh1, Julie Calvert, Karen J Macpherson, Lorna Thompson.   

Abstract

AIM: Rapid review has become widely adopted by health technology assessment agencies in response to demand for evidence-based information to support imperative decisions. Concern about the credibility of rapid reviews and the reliability of their findings has prompted a call for wider publication of their methods. In publishing this overview of the accredited rapid review process developed by Healthcare Improvement Scotland, we aim to raise awareness of our methods and advance the discourse on best practice.
METHODS: Healthcare Improvement Scotland produces rapid reviews called evidence notes using a process that has achieved external accreditation through the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Key components include a structured approach to topic selection, initial scoping, considered stakeholder involvement, streamlined systematic review, internal quality assurance, external peer review and updating.
RESULTS: The process was introduced in 2010 and continues to be refined over time in response to user feedback and operational experience. Decision-makers value the responsiveness of the process and perceive it as being a credible source of unbiased evidence-based information supporting advice for NHSScotland.
CONCLUSION: Many agencies undertaking rapid reviews are striving to balance efficiency with methodological rigour. We agree that there is a need for methodological guidance and that it should be informed by better understanding of current approaches and the consequences of different approaches to streamlining systematic review methods. Greater transparency in the reporting of rapid review methods is essential to enable that to happen.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27058251     DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Evid Based Healthc        ISSN: 1744-1595


  6 in total

1.  Mental health services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in high-income countries: protocol for a rapid review.

Authors:  Ge Yu; Dawn Craig; Yu Fu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Wasifa Zarin; Patricia Rios; Vera Nincic; Paul A Khan; Marco Ghassemi; Sanober Diaz; Ba' Pham; Sharon E Straus; Etienne V Langlois
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.

Authors:  Marcus Tolentino Silva; Everton Nunes da Silva; Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership.

Authors:  Mala Mann; Amanda Woodward; Annmarie Nelson; Anthony Byrne
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2019-12-16

5.  Specialty COPD care during COVID-19: patient and clinician perspectives on remote delivery.

Authors:  Frances Wu; Jenni Burt; Teena Chowdhury; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Graham Martin; Jan W van der Scheer; John R Hurst
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-01

6.  Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.

Authors:  Valerie J King; Adrienne Stevens; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Chris Kamel; Chantelle Garritty
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.