Literature DB >> 2705821

Differentiating pancreatic pseudocyst and pancreatic necrosis using computerized tomography.

R Mainwaring1, J Kern, W G Schenk, L E Rudolf.   

Abstract

Ten per cent of patients with acute pancreatitis will develop pancreatic complications. Differentiating pancreatic pseudocyst formation from pancreatic necrosis may be difficult based on clinical grounds. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of computerized tomography in differentiating these processes. A retrospective analysis was performed of 40 patients who developed pancreatic complications following an episode of acute pancreatitis and who subsequently underwent operation for drainage of their pancreatic fluid collections. All 40 patients had abdominal CT scans performed before surgery and the patients were then categorized on the basis of CT findings as having (1) a pseudocyst with a well-defined cyst wall, (2) peripancreatic fluid marked by the absence of a cyst wall, and (3) a combination of a pseudocyst as well as free peripancreatic fluid. Patients with pseudocysts had an average hospital stay of 14 +/- 2 days, a hospital morbidity rate of 16%, and a hospital mortality rate of 0%. In contrast, patients with peripancreatic fluid collections had an average hospital stay of 43 +/- 4 days (p less than 0.01) and hospital morbidity and mortality rates of 74% (p less than 0.01) and 22% (p less than 0.05), respectively. Patients with both pseudocysts and peripancreatic fluid collections behaved in a similar fashion to patients with peripancreatic fluid alone as characterized by a prolonged hospital stay and a high incidence (80%) of postoperative complications. At one year follow-up, 89% of the patients with pseudocysts were asymptomatic, whereas only 13% (p less than 0.01) of patients with peripancreatic fluid were symptom free. These data demonstrate that pseudocyst and peripancreatic fluid collections have markedly different biologic characteristics both in their short-term and long-term behavior. The results suggest that CT scanning can differentiate these processes and may help in directing the appropriate surgical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2705821      PMCID: PMC1494068          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198905000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic abscess.

Authors:  J H Ranson; F C Spencer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Risk factors in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Bank; L Wise; M Gersten
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Identification of pancreas necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis: imaging procedures versus clinical staging.

Authors:  S Block; W Maier; R Bittner; M Büchler; P Malfertheiner; H G Beger
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  A new method for the diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis using contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  L Kivisaari; K Somer; C G Standertskjöld-Nordenstam; T Schröder; E Kivilaakso; M Lempinen
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1984

5.  Pancreatic necrosis: CT manifestations.

Authors:  E M White; J Wittenberg; P R Mueller; J F Simeone; R J Butch; A L Warshaw; C C Neff; G L Nardi; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  M D Wertheimer; C S Norris
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-04

7.  Computed tomography and the prediction of pancreatic abscess in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J H Ranson; E Balthazar; R Caccavale; M Cooper
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pancreatic phlegmon. Clinical features and course.

Authors:  C F Sostre; J G Flournoy; J G Bova; H M Goldstein; S Schenker
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  D S Beebe; M P Bubrick; G R Onstad; C R Hitchcock
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1984-12

10.  Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria.

Authors:  A L Warshaw; D W Rattner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  A preferable modality for the differentiation of peripancreatic fluid collections: Endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Longsong Li; Danqi Zhao; Zixin Wang; Xueting Wang; Runzi Wang; Yanbo Zeng; Lei Zhang; Ning Zhong; Ying Lv; Enqiang Linghu; Ningli Chai
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.275

2.  CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapy.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Georgios I Papachristou; Grant D Schmit; Prabhleen Chahal; Andrew J LeRoy; Michael G Sarr; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.