Literature DB >> 27058201

Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma.

Anil Nanda1, Shyamal C Bir1, Tanmoy K Maiti1, Subhas K Konar1, Symeon Missios1, Bharat Guthikonda1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The clinical significance of the Simpson system for grading the extent of meningioma resection and its role as a predictor of the recurrence of World Health Organization (WHO) Grade I meningiomas have been questioned in the past, echoing changes in meningioma surgery over the years. The authors reviewed their experience in resecting WHO Grade I meningiomas and assessed the association between extent of resection, as evaluated using the Simpson classification, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients after meningioma surgery. METHODS Clinical and radiological information for patients with WHO Grade I meningiomas who had undergone resective surgery over the past 20 years was retrospectively reviewed. Simpson and Shinshu grading scales were used to evaluate the extent of resection. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS Four hundred fifty-eight patients were eligible for analysis. Overall tumor recurrence rates for Simpson resection Grades I, II, III, and IV were 5%, 22%, 31%, and 35%, respectively. After Cox regression analysis, Simpson Grade I (extensive resection) was revealed as a significant predictor of RFS (p = 0.003). Patients undergoing Simpson Grade I and II resections showed significant improvement in RFS compared with patients undergoing Grade III and IV resections (p = 0.005). Extent of resection had a significant effect on recurrence rates for both skull base (p = 0.047) and convexity (p = 0.012) meningiomas. Female sex and a Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 70 were also identified as independent predictors of RFS after resection of WHO Grade I meningioma. CONCLUSIONS In this patient cohort, a significant association was noted between extent of resection and rates of tumor recurrence. In the authors' experience the Simpson grading system maintains its relevance and prognostic value and can serve an important role for patient education. Even though complete tumor resection is the goal, surgery should be tailored to each patient according to the risks and surgical morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; RFS = recurrence-free survival; Simpson grade; WHO grade; meningioma; oncology; recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27058201     DOI: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  40 in total

1.  Expression of p40 (∆Np63) protein in meningiomas, an unexpected finding: immunohistochemical study and evaluation of its possible prognostic role.

Authors:  Elia Guadagno; Marialaura Del Basso De Caro; Sara Pignatiello; Concetta Sciammarella; Domenico Solari; Paolo Cappabianca; Francesco Maiuri; Flavia Dones
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base.

Authors:  Torstein R Meling; Michele Da Broi; David Scheie; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  The Role of Surgery in Meningiomas.

Authors:  Michele Bailo; Filippo Gagliardi; Nicola Boari; Antonella Castellano; Alfio Spina; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Risk of Developing Postoperative Deficits Based on Tumor Location after Surgical Resection of an Intracranial Meningioma.

Authors:  Jeff S Ehresman; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Davis Rogers; Michael Lim; Gary L Gallia; Jon Weingart; Henry Brem; Chetan Bettegowda; Kaisorn L Chaichana
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-07-17

5.  High-precision radiotherapy for meningiomas : Long-term results and patient-reported outcome (PRO).

Authors:  Kerstin A Kessel; Hanna Fischer; Markus Oechnser; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Meyer; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Value of K i -67 Labeling Index in Predicting Recurrence of WHO Grade I Cranial Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Jose Gabrielle Matias; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Brendan Martin; Ankush Bajaj; Ewa Borys; Edward Melian; Kevin Barton; Douglas E Anderson; Vikram C Prabhu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-09-06

7.  The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?

Authors:  Kira Marie Voß; Dorothee Cäcilia Spille; Cristina Sauerland; Eric Suero Molina; Caroline Brokinkel; Werner Paulus; Walter Stummer; Markus Holling; Astrid Jeibmann; Benjamin Brokinkel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Longitudinal experience with WHO Grade III (anaplastic) meningiomas at a single institution.

Authors:  Suresh K Balasubramanian; Mayur Sharma; Danilo Silva; Vidhya Karivedu; Philipp Schmitt; Glen H Stevens; Gene H Barnett; Richard A Prayson; Paul Elson; John H Suh; Erin S Murphy; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Brent Griffith; Timothy J Kaufmann; Christian la Fougère; Nils Ole Schmidt; Jöerg C Tonn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Pre-operative MRI Radiomics for the Prediction of Progression and Recurrence in Meningiomas.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Yang Zhang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Kai-Ting Chang; Tai-Yuan Chen; Sher-Wei Lim; Te-Chang Wu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.