| Literature DB >> 27057540 |
Lu Liu1, Shan Shu1, Gary Shunpan Cheung2, Xi Wei1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27057540 PMCID: PMC4745861 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3892685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Synthesis and characteristics of PEG-PEI. (a) Nuclear magnetic resonance graph of the products: (A) mPEG-CDI, (B) mPEG-PEI. Strong characteristic peaks of PEG and PEI were shown to reside at about 3.65 ppm (peak b) and 7.35 ppm (peaks d and e), respectively. (b) Dynamic diameter distribution showed that miR-146a/PEG-PEI nanoparticles were in the range 150–360 nm at N/P ratio 1.5 to 40. The particle diameter of the nanoparticles was the lowest at the N/P ratio of 2 and maintained consistent upregulation along with the increasing of N/P value. (c) The zeta potentials were measured to 0 mV at the N/P ratio of 2 and upregulated with the increasing of N/P value. (d) Agarose gel electrophoresis image revealed that the electrophoretic mobility was partially neutralized and the bands were weakened with the increase of N/P value. The motion was completely retarded at N/P ratio of 2.
Figure 2Transfection efficiency, cell uptake, and viability of DPCs incubated with miR-146a/PEG-PEI nanoparticles. ((a) and (b)) Flow cytometry showed that transfection efficiency increased along with the upregulation of N/P and reached the peak (92.9% ± 2.4%) at N/P ratio of 5 and then downregulated at N/P 20. Transfection efficiency percentages of miR-146a/PEG-PEI nanoparticles were all over 80%, which were higher than that of lipo2000 ( p < 0.05, p < 0.001). (c) Cell uptake of DPCs incubated with cy3-miRNA/PEG-PEI nanoparticles. Fluorescent images showed that no cy3-label red fluorescence was expressed in cy3-miRNA/PEG-PEI solution after 0 h incubation. After 1 h of incubation, cytoplasm of a few DPCs revealed red fluorescence, which showed the intracellular distribution of miRNA and delivery agents, whereas, after 2 h and 4 h, the number of cy3-positive cells increased and the DPCs showed stronger red fluorescence in comparison with the 0 h and 1 h groups (×200). The nucleus of DPCs was stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue fluorescence). (d) Cell viability of DPCs treated with miR-146a/PEG-PEI nanoparticles downregulated gradually along with the increasing of N/P ratio. There were no significant differences between the experiment groups and control group when the N/P ratio was lower than 20 (p > 0.05). However, at N/P ratio of 40 and 80, the cell viability decreased to 71.23 ± 1.67% and 63.45 ± 2.03%, respectively, which were significantly downregulated comparing with the control group ( p < 0.05).
Figure 3Drug release profile and cell proliferation of DPCs with LPS treatment. (a) The in vitro drug release experiment showed that the drug release of bFGF, miR-146a, and miR-146a/bFGF amounted to more than 70% at the beginning of the 12 h and maintained slow release over 25 h. (b) CCK8 showed that, comparing with the control group, the OD value of LPS group significantly decreased at both 72 and 96 h after treatment ( p < 0.05). Both miR-146a gel and bFGF gel groups did not show any significant difference (p > 0.05), albeit the OD value of miR-146a/bFGF gel group significantly increased at both 72 and 96 h after treatment ( p < 0.05).
Figure 4Effect of miR-146a/bFGF/PEG-PEI alginate hydrogel on the odontogenic differentiation of DPCs with LPS treatment. ((a1)–(b3)) Western blot showed that the protein expression of DMP-1 and DSP was significantly downregulated in DPCs with LPS treatment after 7 d and 14 d LPS treatment compared with control group ( p < 0.001). After 7 d of odontogenic induction, both DMP-1 and DSP did not show any significant difference in miR-146a gel and bFGF gel group ((a1)–(a3), p > 0.05), albeit dramatically upregulated in miR-146a/bFGF gel group ((a1)–(a3), p < 0.05). After 14 d of odontogenic induction, DMP-1 expression was significantly downregulated in miR-146a gel group ( p < 0.001) and upregulated in miR-146a/bFGF gel group ( p < 0.05), albeit showing no significant difference in bFGF gel group ((b1)-(b2), p > 0.05), whereas DSP did not show any significant difference in miR-146a gel and bFGF gel group and miR-146a/bFGF gel group ((b1) and (b3), p > 0.05). ((c1)–(d5)) Alizarin red staining revealed that, after 14 d of odontogenic induction, numerous mineralization deposits were seen in all groups. The number of mineral nodules was downregulated in LPS group ((c2) and (d2)) compared with control group ((c1) and (d1)). The number of mineral nodules showed no difference between the miR-146a gel ((c3) and (d3)), bFGF gel ((c4) and (d4)), and control group ((c1) and (d1)), albeit the number and average size of mineral nodules were upregulated in miR-146a/bFGF gel group ((c5) and (d5)). ((c1)–(c5)) The gross view of the samples with Alizarin red staining. ((d1)–(d5)) The figures of the samples with Alizarin red staining observed under inverted microscope (×100). ((c1) and (d1)) Control group, ((c2) and (d2)) LPS treated group, ((c3) and (d3)) miR-146a gel group, ((c4) and (d4)) bFGF gel group, and ((c5) and (d5)) miR-146a/bFGF gel group.