Literature DB >> 27057528

Effects of a 16-Week Combined Exercise Program on Isometric Ankle Strength and Gait Velocity in a Selected Sample of Korean Girls.

Moon Seok Kwon1, Dong Jun Sung1, Wi-Young So2, Taikyeong Ted Jeong3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27057528      PMCID: PMC4822378     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

In clinical practice, regular exercise shows great potential as a method for promoting physical health measures such as weight management and preventing a variety of diseases (1–2). Furthermore, regular exercise has been shown to yield both psychological (e.g., improve anxiety, mood, and depression) and social benefits (e.g., self-esteem and social interaction) (3–4). Several recent studies have reported greater effects of combined exercise on physical fitness and conditions (5–6). However, little existing evidence supports the effects of combined exercise on elementary school students. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 16-wk combined exercise-training program on isometric ankle strength and gait velocity in Korean female elementary school students. A sample size of 12 participants was deemed necessary, based on a repeated analysis of variance measure with a 2 × 2 design, an anticipated statistical power of 0.80, an alpha error probability of 0.05, and an effect size of 0.5 (G-power program 3.1.3, Heinreich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). All participants were 8–11-yr-old elementary students at the children’s fitness center in Seoul, Republic of Korea and had an average age (± standard deviation) of 9.00 ± 1.04 yr, average height of 129.00 ± 5.34 cm, average weight of 27.96 ± 3.80 kg, and average body mass index of 16.78 ± 1.85 kg/m2. None of the participants exercised regularly or had any health problems. All participants and their parents submitted written consent forms. All study procedures were approved by the SM Sports Rehabilitation Clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to either the combined exercise (n = 6) or control (n = 6) group. All participants in the combined exercise group performed a 60-minmain exercise program that comprised 30 minutes of treadmill running at an intensity of 60–80% of their heart rate reserve, followed by 30 min of resistance training with a maximum of 10–15 repeats for each exercise type. To measure the isokinetic ankle strength, a Pelican 1150 device (Pelican Products, Torrance, CA, USA) was used to determine the muscle strength (kg) of the right ankle in dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, and eversion. To measure gait velocity, a GaitRite device (CIR System Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA) was used to determine the gait velocity (seconds). A repeated analysis of variance was used to evaluate significant changes in dependent variables before and after the 16-wk combined exercise program in the combined exercise group relative to the control group. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05. Changes in the isometric ankle strength and gait velocity after 16 wk of combined exercise training are shown in Table 1. No significant differences in interaction effects (time X group) were observed on dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion, and gait velocity were observed between the combined exercise and control groups.
Table 1:

Changes in isometric ankle strength and gait velocity after 16 wk of combined exercise training

CategoriesExercisePre-exercisePost-exerciseInteraction (Group X Time)
FP
Dorsiflexion (kg)Control7.62 ± 0.929.15 ± 2.871.6850.233
Combined7.20 ± 1.867.18 ± 1.31
Plantarflexion (kg)Control18.38 ± 5.8418.87 ± 3.603.9600.075
Combined12.85 ± 3.4318.72 ± 5.77
Inversion (kg)Control6.65 ± 2.687.07 ± 3.210.4140.534
Combined5.57 ± 1.907.32 ± 2.79
Eversion (kg)Control6.25 ± 1.946.60 ± 3.080.1010.757
Combined5.08 ± 2.006.03 ± 2.97
Gait velocity (cm/sec)Control61.85 ± 26.4472.69 ± 34.640.6530.438
Combined42.41 ± 17.1677.92 ± 42.95

Determined using a 2-way repeated analysis of variance

Changes in isometric ankle strength and gait velocity after 16 wk of combined exercise training Determined using a 2-way repeated analysis of variance We concluded that a 16-wk supervised combined exercise program did not affect the isometric ankle strength and gait velocity in our sample of Korean female elementary school students.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity interventions and depression in children and adolescents : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Helen Elizabeth Brown; Natalie Pearson; Rock E Braithwaite; Wendy J Brown; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The role of exercise and physical activity in weight loss and maintenance.

Authors:  Damon L Swift; Neil M Johannsen; Carl J Lavie; Conrad P Earnest; Timothy S Church
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  Effects of aerobic or combined aerobic resistance exercise on body composition in overweight and obese adults: gender differences. A randomized intervention study.

Authors:  E Sanal; F Ardic; S Kirac
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 4.  The potential for high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risk.

Authors:  Holly S Kessler; Susan B Sisson; Kevin R Short
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The effectiveness of a combined exercise intervention on physical fitness factors related to falls in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Jie Zhuang; Liang Huang; Yanqiang Wu; Yanxin Zhang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 6.  A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport.

Authors:  Rochelle M Eime; Janet A Young; Jack T Harvey; Melanie J Charity; Warren R Payne
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 6.457

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.