| Literature DB >> 27057281 |
Lapatsanant Chaisiriwong1, Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha2, Panitta Sitthinamsuwan3, Somponnat Sampattavanich1, Somruedee Chatsiricharoenkul1, Woraphong Manuskiatti2, Uraiwan Panich1.
Abstract
Oxidative damage has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). This study illustrated an involvement of oxidative DNA damage and changes in antioxidant defenses in BCC by conducting a case-control study (24 controls and 24 BCC patients) and assessing urinary 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dGuo), plasma antioxidant defenses including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), NQO1, and total superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, and glutathione (GSH) levels before surgery and 1 month after surgery. 8-oxo-dGuo expressions as well as protein and mRNA expressions of DNA repair enzyme hOGG1 and antioxidant defenses (CAT, GCLC, GPx, Nrf2, and MnSOD) in nonneoplastic epidermis of control and BCC tissues were also determined. This study observed induction in urinary 8-oxo-dGuo, increased 8-oxo-dGuo expression, and reduced hOGG1 protein and mRNA in BCC tissues, decreased activities of CAT, GPx, and NQO1, but elevated SOD activities and GSH levels in BCC patients and reduction of all antioxidant proteins and genes studied in BCC tissues. Furthermore, decreased plasma antioxidant activities in BCC patients were restored at 1 month after operation compared with preoperative levels. Herein, we concluded that BCC patients were associated with oxidative DNA damage and depletion of antioxidant defenses and surgical removal of BCC correlated with improved redox status.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27057281 PMCID: PMC4738719 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5934024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Demographics and clinical characteristics of controls subjects and BCC patients.
| Characteristics | Control | Cases |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 64.71 ± 10.58 | 66.82 ± 11.59 | 0.714b |
| Gender, | |||
| Male | 13 (54.20) | 9 (37.5) | 0.247a |
| Female | 11 (45.8) | 15 (62.5) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.41 ± 2.38 | 22.98 ± 3.31 | 0.217b |
|
| |||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 95.82 ± 12.24 | 101.65 ± 14.10 | 0.317c |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 13.44 ± 3.82 | 14.32 ± 5.09 | 0.891b |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.04 ± 0.23 | 1.05 ± 0.25 | 0.949c |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 187.97 ± 36.44 | 201.76 ± 34.21 | 0.402c |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 129.64 ± 62.23 | 109.76 ± 43.34 | 0.156b |
| HDL-Chol (mg/dL) | 57.88 ± 18.92 | 63.59 ± 17.27 | 0.402b |
| LDL-Cal (mg/dL) | 101.85 ± 31.34 | 116.22 ± 31.06 | 0.110b |
| AST (U/L) | 27.24 ± 12.01 | 26.82 ± 13.50 | 0.359b |
| ALT (U/L) | 20.67 ± 9.32 | 21.29 ± 12.68 | 0.593b |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 64.83 ± 19.44 | 65.24 ± 18.94 | 0.849c |
| CBC | |||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.21 ± 1.76 | 12.84 ± 1.25 | 0.200b |
| RBC count (×106/ | 4.60 ± 0.62 | 4.49 ± 0.48 | 0.404c |
| WBC count (×103/ | 6.91 ± 1.65 | 7.63 ± 1.48 | 0.195b |
|
| |||
| Smoking, | |||
| Nonsmoker | 18 (75.0) | 19 (79.2) | 0.598a |
| Ex-smoker | 5 (20.8) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Current smoker | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Drinking alcohol, | |||
| Nondrinker | 19 (79.2) | 19 (79.2) | 0.574a |
| Ex-drinker | 4 (16.7) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Occupation type, | |||
| Indoor | 22 (91.7) | 21 (87.5) | 0.637a |
| Outdoor | 2 (8.3) | 3 (12.5) | |
| Vegetarian, | |||
| Yes | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.312a |
| No | 23 (95.8) | 24 (100.0) | |
| Chemical, | |||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.2) | 0.312a |
| No | 24 (100.0) | 23 (95.8) |
BMI = body mass index, BUN = blood urea nitrogen, HDL-Chol = high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-Cal = calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, CBC = complete blood count, RBC = red blood cell, and WBC = white blood cell. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. The statistical significance of differences in categorical variables data was evaluated by chi-square test (a); nonparametric variables were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test (b) and parametric variables by unpaired Student's t-test (c).
Comparison of urinary oxidative DNA damage levels and plasma antioxidant defense status between control subjects and BCC patients.
| Parameters | Controls ( | Cases ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before surgery | 1 month after surgery | Before surgery | 1 month after surgery | 6 months after surgery | |
| 8-oxo-dGuo (ng/mg creatinine) | 61.92 ± 17.35 | 71.51 ± 16.68 | 110.08 ± 30.09 | 106.65 ± 26.17 | 64.44 ± 19.02### |
| CAT (unit/mg protein) | 4.38 ± 0.80 | 3.96 ± 0.68 | 2.55 ± 0.43 | 4.34 ± 1.13### | |
| GPx (unit/mg protein) | 0.77 ± 0.20 | 0.77 ± 0.21 | 0.42 ± 0.13 | 0.75 ± 0.11### | |
| NQO1 ( | 928.25 ± 203.20 | 977.87 ± 184.54 | 708.53 ± 112.66 | 1010.30 ± 281.00### | |
| Total SOD (unit/mg protein) | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | |
| GSH ( | 152.19 ± 44.88 | 156.92 ± 40.41 | 235.76 ± 42.75 | 220.93 ± 52.44 | |
Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
P < 0.001 compared to control, before surgery.
### P < 0.001 compared to case, before surgery.
Figure 1The urinary 8-oxo-dGuo levels (a) and plasma antioxidant defense status [CAT (b), GPx (c), NQO1 (d), and total SOD (e) activities and GSH levels (f)] in control subjects and BCC patients before and after surgery. Values given are mean ± SD. The statistical significance of differences between the control and case was evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. P < 0.001 compared to preoperative values in control subjects prior to surgery; ### P < 0.001 compared to preoperative values in BCC patients prior to surgery. Principal component analysis was performed to systematically investigate similarity of DNA damage and antioxidant defense parameters from different groups of patients (g). Factor analysis is overlaid on top of the patient scores, both before surgery (case: triangle; control: square) and 1 month after surgery (case: circle; control: plus). The dashed and dotted ovals delineate the approximated distribution of each group with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2The H&E staining ((a)–(c)) and IHC staining for oxidative DNA damage, 8-oxo-dGuo ((d)–(g)), DNA repair enzyme, hOGG1 ((h)–(k)), and antioxidant proteins, CAT ((l)–(o)), GCLC ((p)–(s)), GPx ((t)–(w)), Nrf2 ((x)–(aa)), and MnSOD ((ab)–(ae)), in control subjects and tumor and nontumor lesions of BCC patients. Values given are mean ± SD. The statistical significance of differences between the control and case and between adjacent epidermis and tumor lesions of BCC patients was evaluated by nonparametric variables with Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001 compared to control; ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 compared to tumor lesions of BCC patients.
Expressions of oxidative DNA damage, DNA repair enzyme, and antioxidant proteins in skin tissues of control subjects and BCC patients by IRS.
| Parameters | Controls ( | Cases ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidermis | BCC | Adjacent epidermis | |
| 8-oxo-dGuo | 2.30 ± 0.67 | 2.88 ± 0.30 | 2.27 ± 0.72### |
| hOGG1 | 2.56 ± 0.47 | 1.77 ± 0.40 | 2.53 ± 0.47### |
| CAT | 1.79 ± 0.63 | 1.18 ± 0.74 | 2.00 ± 0.48### |
| GCLC | 2.17 ± 0.57 | 1.59 ± 0.56 | 2.70 ± 0.45 |
| GPx | 2.02 ± 0.37 | 1.24 ± 0.51 | 1.73 ± 0.41## |
| Nrf2 | 2.40 ± 0.57 | 1.53 ± 0.47 | 2.33 ± 0.44### |
| MnSOD | 1.95 ± 0.53 | 1.41 ± 0.65 | 2.60 ± 0.46 |
Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001 compared to epidermis of control.
## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 compared to BCC lesion.
Figure 3DNA repair and antioxidant gene expression in nonmalignant skin tissues of control subjects and BCC tissues. Gene expression was evaluated by real-time PCR with the 2−ΔΔCt method. The data are presented as the fold change in gene expression normalized to GAPDH. Values given are mean ± SD. The statistical significance of differences between the control and case was evaluated by nonparametric variables with Mann Whitney U test. P < 0.001 compared to control.