Literature DB >> 27057085

Learning Classification Models of Cognitive Conditions from Subtle Behaviors in the Digital Clock Drawing Test.

William Souillard-Mandar1, Randall Davis2, Cynthia Rudin3, Rhoda Au4, David J Libon5, Rodney Swenson6, Catherine C Price7, Melissa Lamar8, Dana L Penney9.   

Abstract

The Clock Drawing Test - a simple pencil and paper test - has been used for more than 50 years as a screening tool to differentiate normal individuals from those with cognitive impairment, and has proven useful in helping to diagnose cognitive dysfunction associated with neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and other dementias and conditions. We have been administering the test using a digitizing ballpoint pen that reports its position with considerable spatial and temporal precision, making available far more detailed data about the subject's performance. Using pen stroke data from these drawings categorized by our software, we designed and computed a large collection of features, then explored the tradeoffs in performance and interpretability in classifiers built using a number of different subsets of these features and a variety of different machine learning techniques. We used traditional machine learning methods to build prediction models that achieve high accuracy. We operationalized widely used manual scoring systems so that we could use them as benchmarks for our models. We worked with clinicians to define guidelines for model interpretability, and constructed sparse linear models and rule lists designed to be as easy to use as scoring systems currently used by clinicians, but more accurate. While our models will require additional testing for validation, they offer the possibility of substantial improvement in detecting cognitive impairment earlier than currently possible, a development with considerable potential impact in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clock Drawing Test; Cognitive Impairment Diagnostics; Interpretable Machine Learning; Machine Learning Applications; Medical Scoring Systems

Year:  2015        PMID: 27057085      PMCID: PMC4821477          DOI: 10.1007/s10994-015-5529-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mach Learn        ISSN: 0885-6125            Impact factor:   2.940


  26 in total

1.  The mini-cog: a cognitive 'vital signs' measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly.

Authors:  S Borson; J Scanlan; M Brush; P Vitaliano; A Dokmak
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.485

2.  Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy.

Authors:  Hanchuan Peng; Fuhui Long; Chris Ding
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  An accurate and interpretable bayesian classification model for prediction of HERG liability.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Accuracy of the clock drawing test for detecting dementia in a multicultural sample of elderly Australian patients.

Authors:  Joella E Storey; Jeffrey T J Rowland; David Basic; David A Conforti
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.878

6.  A comparison of five clock scoring methods using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis.

Authors:  J E Storey; J T Rowland; D Basic; D A Conforti
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.485

7.  A comparison of alternative approaches to the scoring of clock drawing.

Authors:  H Tuokko; T Hadjistavropoulos; S Rae; N O'Rourke
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease.

Authors:  I Rouleau; D P Salmon; N Butters; C Kennedy; K McGuire
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Development of scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M F Mendez; T Ala; K L Underwood
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Clock drawing as an assessment tool for dementia.

Authors:  D J Libon; R A Swenson; E J Barnoski; L P Sands
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.813

View more
  28 in total

1.  Feasibility and Rationale for Incorporating Frailty and Cognitive Screening Protocols in a Preoperative Anesthesia Clinic.

Authors:  Shawna Amini; Samuel Crowley; Loren Hizel; Franchesca Arias; David J Libon; Patrick Tighe; Chris Giordano; Cynthia W Garvan; F Kayser Enneking; Catherine C Price
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Age and Graphomotor Decision Making Assessed with the Digital Clock Drawing Test: The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ryan J Piers; Kathryn N Devlin; Boting Ning; Yulin Liu; Ben Wasserman; Joseph M Massaro; Melissa Lamar; Catherine C Price; Rod Swenson; Randall Davis; Dana L Penney; Rhoda Au; David J Libon
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 3.  Amyloid Accumulation and Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Older Individuals: Implications for Aging and Early Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Mormino; Kathryn V Papp
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 4.  Technology and Dementia: The Future is Now.

Authors:  Arlene J Astell; Nicole Bouranis; Jesse Hoey; Allison Lindauer; Alex Mihailidis; Chris Nugent; Julie M Robillard
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.959

5.  Clock Drawing Performance Slows for Older Adults After Total Knee Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Loren P Hizel; Eric D Warner; Margaret E Wiggins; Jared J Tanner; Hari Parvataneni; Randall Davis; Dana L Penney; David J Libon; Patrick Tighe; Cynthia W Garvan; Catherine C Price
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  How technology is reshaping cognitive assessment: Lessons from the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Rhoda Au; Ryan J Piers; Sherral Devine
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Classifying Non-Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease/Vascular Dementia Patients Using Kinematic, Time-Based, and Visuospatial Parameters: The Digital Clock Drawing Test.

Authors:  Anis Davoudi; Catherine Dion; Shawna Amini; Patrick J Tighe; Catherine C Price; David J Libon; Parisa Rashidi
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Phenotyping Cognitive Impairment using Graphomotor and Latency Features in Digital Clock Drawing Test.

Authors:  Anis Davoudi; Catherine Dion; Shawna Amini; David J Libon; Patrick J Tighe; Catherine C Price; Parisa Rashidi
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2020-07

9.  Cognitive Correlates of Digital Clock Drawing Metrics in Older Adults with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Catherine Dion; Franchesca Arias; Shawna Amini; Randall Davis; Dana Penney; David J Libon; Catherine C Price
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

10.  Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Phenotypes Show Unique Clock Drawing Features when Measured with Digital Technology.

Authors:  Catherine Dion; Brandon E Frank; Samuel J Crowley; Loren P Hizel; Katie Rodriguez; Jared J Tanner; David J Libon; Catherine C Price
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.