Shichun Peng1, Yilong Ma2, Joseph Flores3, Michael Cornfeldt4, Branka Mitrovic5, David Eidelberg1, Doris J Doudet3. 1. Center for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, New York. 2. Center for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, New York yma@nshs.edu. 3. Department of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Titan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Somerville, New Jersey; and. 5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Richmond, California.
Abstract
Abnormal covariance pattern of regional metabolism associated with Parkinson disease (PD) is modulated by dopaminergic pharmacotherapy. Using high-resolution 18F-FDG PET and network analysis, we previously derived and validated a parkinsonism-related metabolic pattern (PRP) in nonhuman primate models of PD. It is currently not known whether this network is modulated by experimental therapeutics. In this study, we examined changes in network activity by striatal implantation of human levodopa-producing retinal pigment epithelial (hRPE) cells in parkinsonian macaques and evaluated the reproducibility of network activity in a small test-retest study. METHODS: 18F-FDG PET scans were acquired in 8 healthy macaques and 8 macaques with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced bilateral nigrostriatal dopaminergic lesions after unilateral putaminal implantation of hRPE cells or sham surgery. PRP activity was measured prospectively in all animals and in a subset of test-retest animals using a network quantification approach. Network activity and regional metabolic values were compared on a hemispheric basis between animal groups and treatment conditions. RESULTS: All individual macaques showed clinical improvement after hRPE cell implantation compared with the sham surgery. PRP activity was elevated in the untreated MPTP hemispheres relative to those of the normal controls (P < 0.00005) but was reduced (P < 0.05) in the hRPE-implanted hemispheres. The modulation observed in network activity was supported by concurrent local and remote changes in regional glucose metabolism. PRP activity remained unchanged in the untreated MPTP hemispheres versus the sham-operated hemispheres. PRP activity was also stable (P ≥ 0.29) and correlated (R2 ≥ 0.926; P < 0.00005) in the test-retest hemispheres. These findings were highly reproducible across several PRP topographies generated in multiple cohorts of parkinsonian and healthy macaques. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated long-term therapeutic effects of hRPE cell implantation in nonhuman primate models of PD. The implantation of such levodopa-producing cells can concurrently decrease the elevated metabolic network activity in parkinsonian brains on an individual basis. These results parallel the analogous findings reported in patients with PD undergoing levodopa therapy and other symptomatic interventions. With further validation in large samples, 18F-FDG PET imaging with network analysis may provide a viable biomarker for assessing treatment response in animal models of PD after experimental therapies.
Abnormal covariance pattern of regional metabolism associated with Parkinson disease (PD) is modulated by dopaminergic pharmacotherapy. Using high-resolution 18F-FDG PET and network analysis, we previously derived and validated a parkinsonism-related metabolic pattern (PRP) in nonhuman primate models of PD. It is currently not known whether this network is modulated by experimental therapeutics. In this study, we examined changes in network activity by striatal implantation of humanlevodopa-producing retinal pigment epithelial (hRPE) cells in parkinsonian macaques and evaluated the reproducibility of network activity in a small test-retest study. METHODS:18F-FDG PET scans were acquired in 8 healthy macaques and 8 macaques with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced bilateral nigrostriatal dopaminergic lesions after unilateral putaminal implantation of hRPE cells or sham surgery. PRP activity was measured prospectively in all animals and in a subset of test-retest animals using a network quantification approach. Network activity and regional metabolic values were compared on a hemispheric basis between animal groups and treatment conditions. RESULTS: All individual macaques showed clinical improvement after hRPE cell implantation compared with the sham surgery. PRP activity was elevated in the untreated MPTP hemispheres relative to those of the normal controls (P < 0.00005) but was reduced (P < 0.05) in the hRPE-implanted hemispheres. The modulation observed in network activity was supported by concurrent local and remote changes in regional glucose metabolism. PRP activity remained unchanged in the untreated MPTP hemispheres versus the sham-operated hemispheres. PRP activity was also stable (P ≥ 0.29) and correlated (R2 ≥ 0.926; P < 0.00005) in the test-retest hemispheres. These findings were highly reproducible across several PRP topographies generated in multiple cohorts of parkinsonian and healthy macaques. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated long-term therapeutic effects of hRPE cell implantation in nonhuman primate models of PD. The implantation of such levodopa-producing cells can concurrently decrease the elevated metabolic network activity in parkinsonian brains on an individual basis. These results parallel the analogous findings reported in patients with PD undergoing levodopa therapy and other symptomatic interventions. With further validation in large samples, 18F-FDG PET imaging with network analysis may provide a viable biomarker for assessing treatment response in animal models of PD after experimental therapies.
Authors: Natividad P Stover; Roy A E Bakay; Thyagarajan Subramanian; Cathy D Raiser; Michael L Cornfeldt; Alfred W Schweikert; Richard C Allen; Ray L Watts Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Robert E Gross; Raymond L Watts; Robert A Hauser; Roy Ae Bakay; Heinz Reichmann; Rüdiger von Kummer; William G Ondo; Elke Reissig; Wilhelm Eisner; Heike Steiner-Schulze; Harald Siedentop; Klaus Fichte; Walter Hong; Michael Cornfeldt; Katherine Beebe; Rupert Sandbrink Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Yilong Ma; Chengke Tang; Thomas Chaly; Paul Greene; Robert Breeze; Stanley Fahn; Curt Freed; Vijay Dhawan; David Eidelberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Andrew Feigin; Michael G Kaplitt; Chengke Tang; Tanya Lin; Paul Mattis; Vijay Dhawan; Matthew J During; David Eidelberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Torsten Falk; Nicole R Congrove; Shiling Zhang; Alexander D McCourt; Scott J Sherman; Brian S McKay Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol Date: 2012-04-02
Authors: Renata P Lerner; Veronica Francardo; Koji Fujita; Zisis Bimpisidis; Vincent A Jourdain; Chris C Tang; Stephen L Dewey; Thomas Chaly; M Angela Cenci; David Eidelberg Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Martijn Devrome; Cindy Casteels; Anke Van der Perren; Koen Van Laere; Veerle Baekelandt; Michel Koole Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jelena Osmanovic Barilar; Ana Knezovic; Ana Babic Perhoc; Jan Homolak; Peter Riederer; Melita Salkovic-Petrisic Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.575