Literature DB >> 27056612

Outcomes of pediatric patients supported with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices: A report from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS).

Joseph W Rossano1, Angela Lorts2, Christina J VanderPluym3, Aamir Jeewa4, Kristine J Guleserian5, Mark S Bleiweis6, Olaf Reinhartz7, Elizabeth D Blume3, David N Rosenthal8, David C Naftel9, Ryan S Cantor10, James K Kirklin9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow (CF) ventricular assist devices (VADs) have largely replaced pulsatile-flow VADs in adult patients. However, there are few data on CF VADs among pediatric patients. In this study we aimed to describe the overall use, patients' characteristics and outcomes of CF VADs in this population.
METHODS: The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS) is a national registry for U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA)-approved VADs in patients <19 years of age. Patients undergoing placement of durable CF VADs between September 2012 and June 2015 were included and outcomes were compared with those of adults from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).
RESULTS: CF VADs were implanted in 109 patients at 35 hospitals. The median age at implantation was 15 years (2.8 to 18.9 years) and median weight was 62 kg (range 16 to 141 kg). The underlying disease was cardiomyopathy in 89 (82%) patients. The INTERMACS level at time of implant was Level 1 in 20 (19%), Level 2 in 64 (61%) and Levels 3 to 7 in 21 (20%) patients. Most were implanted as LVADs (n = 102, 94%). Median duration of support was 2.3 months (range <1 day to 28 months). Serious adverse event rates were low, including neurologic dysfunction (early event rate 4.1 per 100 patient-months with 2 late events). Competing outcomes analysis at 6 months post-implant indicated 61% transplanted, 31% alive with device in place and 8% death before transplant. These outcomes compared favorably with the 3,894 adults supported with CF VADs as a bridge to transplant.
CONCLUSIONS: CF VADs are commonly utilized in older children and adolescents, with excellent survival rates. Further study is needed to understand impact of patient and device characteristics on outcomes in pediatric patients.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bridge to transplant; heart failure; mechanical circulatory support; outcomes; pediatric; ventricular assist devices

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056612     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  13 in total

1.  Titanium Plug Closure after HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device Explantation in a 15-Year-Old Girl: First U.S. Experience.

Authors:  Diego A Lara; Aamir Jeewa; Barbara A Elias; Elizabeth O McCullum; Susan W Denfield; William J Dreyer; Iki Adachi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Systemic Atrioventricular Valve Excision and Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Deipanjan Nandi; Kelley D Miller; Carley M Bober; Tami M Rosenthal; Lisa M Montenegro; Joseph W Rossano; J William Gaynor; Christopher E Mascio
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Scaling the Low-Shear Pulsatile TORVAD for Pediatric Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Erik R Larson; Brian H Hsi; Mark Kurusz; Richard W Smalling; Raul G Longoria
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  The Evolution of a Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Program: The Boston Children's Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Beth Hawkins; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Kevin P Daly; Michelle Corf; Elizabeth Blume; Jean Connor; Courtney Porter; Christopher Almond; Christina VanderPluym
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Pediatric ventricular assist device registries: update and perspectives in the era of miniaturized continuous-flow pumps.

Authors:  Kevin M Lichtenstein; Hari P Tunuguntla; David M Peng; Holger Buchholz; Jennifer Conway
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05

6.  Infectious complications of ventricular assist device use in children in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs).

Authors:  Scott R Auerbach; Marc E Richmond; Kurt R Schumacher; Dalia Lopez-Colon; Max B Mitchell; Mark W Turrentine; Ryan S Cantor; Robert A Niebler; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  Patient and Device Selection in Pediatric MCS: A Review of Current Consensus and Unsettled Questions.

Authors:  Joshua M Friedland-Little; Anna Joong; Svetlana B Shugh; Matthew J O'Connor; Neha Bansal; Ryan R Davies; Michelle S Ploutz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.838

Review 8.  Pediatric ventricular assist devices: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Sarah Burki; Iki Adachi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-05-15

9.  Resource Utilization in Pediatric Patients Supported With Ventricular Assist Devices in the United States: A Multicenter Study From the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support and the Pediatric Health Information System.

Authors:  Joseph W Rossano; Ryan S Cantor; Dingwei Dai; Pirouz Shamszad; Yuan-Shung Huang; Matthew Hall; Kimberly Y Lin; R Erik Edens; P Eugene Parrino; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Paracorporeal Lung Devices: Thinking Outside the Box.

Authors:  Timothy M Maul; Jennifer S Nelson; Peter D Wearden
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.