Literature DB >> 27056580

Comparing long-term outcomes between early and delayed initiation of peritoneal dialysis following catheter implantation.

Mei-Fen Pai1, Ju-Yeh Yang1, Hung-Yuan Chen1, Shih-Ping Hsu1, Yen-Ling Chiu1, Hon-Yen Wu1, Wan-Chuan Tsai1, Yu-Seng Peng1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare peritonitis rates, peritoneal dialysis technique survival and patient survival between patients who started peritoneal dialysis earlier than 14 days (early starters) and 14 days or more (delayed starters) after insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter.
METHODS: Observational analysis was performed for all patients who underwent insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012. The patients were divided into two groups: early and delayed starters. The rate and outcomes of peritonitis were recorded. Peritoneal dialysis technique survival and patient survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed for peritoneal dialysis technique failure and patient mortality.
RESULTS: There were 80 early starters and 69 delayed starters. The peritonitis rate was 0.18 episodes per year in early starters and 0.13 episodes per year in delayed starters. There was no significant difference of peritonitis free survival (p = 0.146), peritoneal dialysis technique survival (p = 0.273) and patient survival (p = 0.739) at 1, 3, 5 years between early starters and delayed starters. After adjustment with age, albumin and diabetes, early starters did not have an increased risk of peritonitis, technique failure and mortality compared to delayed starters.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the patients who started peritoneal dialysis 14 days or more after catheter implantation, the patients who started earlier did not have an increased risk of peritonitis, peritoneal dialysis technique failure and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter-related infections; peritoneal dialysis; peritonitis; renal dialysis; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056580     DOI: 10.3109/0886022X.2016.1165069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for early onset peritonitis: the SCOPE collaborative.

Authors:  Mahima Keswani; Allison C Redpath Mahon; Troy Richardson; Jonathan Rodean; Olivera Couloures; Abigail Martin; Richard T Blaszak; Bradley A Warady; Alicia Neu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  How To Build a Successful Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Program.

Authors:  Nilum Rajora; Shani Shastri; Gulzar Pirwani; Ramesh Saxena
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-08-11

3.  Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Htay Htay; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Carmel M Hawley; Yeoungjee Cho
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Randomized Study of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Urgent-Start Temporary Hemodialysis in Patients Transitioning to Kidney Failure.

Authors:  Watanyu Parapiboon; Juthamash Sangsuk; Tanawin Nopsopon; Wannapat Pitsawong; Sajja Tatiyanupanwong; Talerngsak Kanjanabuch; David W Johnson
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-06-11

5.  Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Xi Wen; Liming Yang; Zhanshan Sun; Xiaoxuan Zhang; Xueyan Zhu; Wenhua Zhou; Xiaoqing Hu; Shichen Liu; Ping Luo; Wenpeng Cui
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 2.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.