Literature DB >> 27055894

Advantages and limitations of chemical extraction tests to predict mercury soil-plant transfer in soil risk evaluations.

R J R Monteiro1, S M Rodrigues2, N Cruz1, B Henriques1,3, A C Duarte1, P F A M Römkens4, E Pereira1.   

Abstract

In this study, we compared the size of the mobile Hg pool in soil to those obtained by extractions using 2 M HNO3, 5 M HNO3, and 2 M HCl. This was done to evaluate their suitability to be used as proxies in view of Hg uptake by ryegrass. Total levels of Hg in soil ranged from 0.66 to 70 mg kg(-1) (median 17 mg kg(-1)), and concentrations of Hg extracted increased in the order: mobile Hg < 2 M HNO3 < 5 M HNO3 < 2 M HCl. The percentage of Hg extracted relative to total Hg in soil varied from 0.13 to 0.79 % (for the mobile pool) to 4.8-82 % (for 2 M HCl). Levels of Hg in ryegrass ranged from 0.060 to 36 mg kg(-1) (median 0.65 mg kg(-1), in roots) and from 0.040 to 5.4 mg kg(-1) (median 0.34 mg kg(-1), in shoots). Although results from the 2 M HNO3 extraction appeared to the most comparable to the actual total Hg levels measured in plants, the 2 M HCl extraction better expressed the variation in plant pools. In general, soil tests explained between 66 and 86 % of the variability of Hg contents in ryegrass shoots. Results indicated that all methods tested here can be used to estimate the plant total Hg pool at contaminated areas and can be used in first tier soil risk evaluations. This study also indicates that a relevant part of Hg in plants is from deposition of soil particles and that splashing of soil can be more significant for plant contamination than actual uptake processes. Graphical Abstract Illustration of potential mercury soil-plant transfer routes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural soils; Chemical availability; Mercury; Plant uptake; Risk assessment; Soil tests

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27055894     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6564-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Influence of soil mercury concentration and fraction on bioaccumulation process of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Hongyan Liu; Buyun Du; Lihai Shang; Junbo Yang; Yusheng Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Monitoring metals in terrestrial environments within a bioavailability framework and a focus on soil extraction.

Authors:  Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Marina Zablotskaja; Martina G Vijver
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Risks associated with the transfer of toxic organo-metallic mercury from soils into the terrestrial feed chain.

Authors:  Bruno Henriques; S M Rodrigues; C Coelho; N Cruz; A C Duarte; P F A M Römkens; E Pereira
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Distribution and mobility of mercury in soils from an old mining area in Mieres, Asturias (Spain).

Authors:  Rodolfo Fernández-Martínez; Jorge Loredo; Almudena Ordóñez; María Isabel Rucandio
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Binding, distribution, and plant uptake of mercury in a soil from Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

Authors:  Fengxiang X Han; Yi Su; David L Monts; Charles A Waggoner; M John Plodinec
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Children's exposure to mercury-contaminated soils: exposure assessment and risk characterization.

Authors:  Mert Guney; Bruno Welfringer; Carl de Repentigny; Gerald J Zagury
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Evaluation of an approach for the characterization of reactive and available pools of twenty potentially toxic elements in soils: part I--the role of key soil properties in the variation of contaminants' reactivity.

Authors:  S M Rodrigues; B Henriques; E Ferreira da Silva; M E Pereira; A C Duarte; P F A M Römkens
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Speciation of mercury in soil and sediment by selective solvent and acid extraction.

Authors:  Y Han; H M Kingston; H M Boylan; G M M Rahman; S Shah; R C Richter; D D Link; S Bhandari
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Fractionation studies of mercury in soils and sediments: a review of the chemical reagents used for mercury extraction.

Authors:  N Issaro; C Abi-Ghanem; A Bermond
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 6.558

10.  Oral bioaccessibility and human exposure to anthropogenic and geogenic mercury in urban, industrial and mining areas.

Authors:  S M Rodrigues; C Coelho; N Cruz; R J R Monteiro; B Henriques; A C Duarte; P F A M Römkens; E Pereira
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of extractants used for the assessment of mercury availability in a soil from the Almadén mining district (Spain).

Authors:  Luis Rodríguez; Jacinto Alonso-Azcárate; Rocío Gómez; Laura Rodríguez-Castellanos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Remediation of Soil Mercury by Modified Vermiculite-Montmorillonite and Its Effect on the Growth of Brassica chinensis L.

Authors:  Chang Li; Yuchen Li; Hua Cheng; Chunlu Jiang; Liugen Zheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.927

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.