Literature DB >> 27055782

Oncological Outcomes in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Comparison Between Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Approaches.

Tae Heon Kim1, Hyun Hwan Sung2, Hwang Gyun Jeon2, Seong Il Seo2, Seong Soo Jeon2, Hyun Moo Lee2, Han Yong Choi2, Byong Chang Jeong2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate oncological outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent open radical cystectomy (ORC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC), or robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 230 patients who underwent ORC (n = 150), LRC (n = 22), or RARC (n = 58) between September 2009 and June 2012. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the three surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of RFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a Cox regression model.
RESULTS: The median patient age for ORC, LRC, and RARC groups was 68.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60.0-73.0), 65.0 (IQR: 62.8-74.0), and 61.5 (IQR: 54.8-72.0) years, respectively (p = 0.017), and the median follow-up duration was 27.9 (IQR: 14.7-47.9), 28.8 (IQR: 15.7-41.8), and 32.0 (IQR: 15.5-45.4) months, respectively (p = 0.955). There was no significant difference in RFS, CSS, and OS according to the surgical approach (p = 0.253, p = 0.431, and p = 0.527, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that RFS, CSS, and OS were not significantly different in both subgroups with stage ≤pT2 or ≥pT3. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the surgical approach was not a significant predictor of RFS, CSS, and OS.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the type of surgical approach is not associated with RFS, CSS, and OS in patients with bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27055782     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

1.  Survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Multicenter comparison between minimally invasive and open approaches.

Authors:  Weibin Xie; Junming Bi; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Dongkui Song; Lei Shi; Dingwei Ye; Yijun Shen; Xin Gou; Weiyang He; Shaogang Wang; Zheng Liu; Jinhai Fan; Kaijie Wu; Zhiwen Chen; Xiaozhou Zhou; Chuize Kong; Yang Liu; Chunxiao Liu; Abai Xu; Baiye Jin; Guanghou Fu; Wei Xue; Haige Chen; Tiejun Pan; Zhong Tu; Tianxin Lin; Jian Huang
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-06-14

2.  The interplay between adipose-derived stem cells and bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Malgorzata Maj; Anna Kokocha; Anna Bajek; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Review of the evidence for robotic-assisted robotic cystectomy and intra-corporeal urinary diversion in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Kittinut Kijvikai; Karel Decaestecker; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

4.  Higher nodal yield with robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer compared to laparoscopic dissection: implications for more accurate staging.

Authors:  Amandeep Arora; Felipe Pugliesi; Ahmed S Zugail; Marco Moschini; Cristiano Pazeto; Petr Macek; Armando Stabile; Camille Lanz; Nathalie Cathala; Mostefa Bennamoun; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-10-01

5.  Protocol of the Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC): a non-randomized, 24-month, multicenter study comparing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery for radical cystectomy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Angelo Porreca; Katie Palmer; Walter Artibani; Alessandro Antonelli; Lorenzo Bianchi; Eugenio Brunocilla; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Maurizio Brausi; Gian Maria Busetto; Marco Carini; Giuseppe Carrieri; Antonio Celia; Luca Cindolo; Giovanni Cochetti; Renzo Colombo; Ettore De Berardinis; Ottavio De Cobelli; Fabrizio Di Maida; Amelio Ercolino; Franco Gaboardi; Antonio Galfano; Andrea Gallina; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Introini; Ettore Mearini; Andrea Minervini; Francesco Montorsi; Gennaro Musi; Giovannalberto Pini; Riccardo Schiavina; Silvia Secco; Sergio Serni; Claudio Simeone; Giovanni Tasso; Daniele D'Agostino
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Three-port approach vs standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit: a single-centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhouting Tuo; Ying Zhang; Jinyou Wang; Huan Zhou; Youlu Lu; Xin Wang; Chao Yang; Dexin Yu; Liangkuan Bi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion: Initial experience and outcomes.

Authors:  Nitin Shrivastava; Brusabhanu Nayak; Premnath Dogra; Rajeev Kumar; Prabhjot Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 8.  The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Ioannis Tyritzis; Justin W Collins; Nils Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

9.  Does robotic radical cystectomy impede oncological outcome in bladder cancer patients?

Authors:  Günter Niegisch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12

10.  Bayesian network analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lin Dong; Yu Qin; Lu Ya; Cao Liang; Hu Tinghui; He Pinlin; Yang Jin; Wang Youliang; Cui Shu; Wu Tao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.