Rein Sikveland1, Elizabeth Stokoe2, Jon Symonds3. 1. Department of Social Sciences, School of Social, Political and Geographical Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. Electronic address: r.o.sikveland@lboro.ac.uk. 2. Department of Social Sciences, School of Social, Political and Geographical Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. 3. School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study addresses, for the first time, the effectiveness of receptionists handling incoming calls from patients to access General Practice services. METHODS: It is a large-scale qualitative study of three services in the UK. Using conversation analysis, we identified the issue of 'patient burden', which we defined based on the trouble patients display pursuing service. We quantified instances of 'patient burden' using a coding scheme. RESULTS: We demonstrate how 'patient burden' unfolds in two phases of the telephone calls: (i) following an initial rejection of a patient's request; and (ii) following a receptionist's initiation of call closing. Our quantitative analysis shows that the three GP services differ in the frequency of 'patient burden' and reveals a correlation between the proportion of 'patient burden' and independent national satisfaction scores for these surgeries. CONCLUSION: Unlike post-hoc surveys, our analysis of live calls identifies the communicative practices which may constitute patient (dis)satisfaction. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Through establishing what receptionists handle well or less well in encounters with patients, we propose ways of improving such encounters through training or other forms of intervention.
OBJECTIVE: This study addresses, for the first time, the effectiveness of receptionists handling incoming calls from patients to access General Practice services. METHODS: It is a large-scale qualitative study of three services in the UK. Using conversation analysis, we identified the issue of 'patient burden', which we defined based on the trouble patients display pursuing service. We quantified instances of 'patient burden' using a coding scheme. RESULTS: We demonstrate how 'patient burden' unfolds in two phases of the telephone calls: (i) following an initial rejection of a patient's request; and (ii) following a receptionist's initiation of call closing. Our quantitative analysis shows that the three GP services differ in the frequency of 'patient burden' and reveals a correlation between the proportion of 'patient burden' and independent national satisfaction scores for these surgeries. CONCLUSION: Unlike post-hoc surveys, our analysis of live calls identifies the communicative practices which may constitute patient (dis)satisfaction. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Through establishing what receptionists handle well or less well in encounters with patients, we propose ways of improving such encounters through training or other forms of intervention.
Authors: Amit Desai; Giulia Zoccatelli; Mary Adams; Davina Allen; Sally Brearley; Anne Marie Rafferty; Glenn Robert; Sara Donetto Journal: J Health Serv Res Policy Date: 2017-01-09
Authors: Julia Townson; Dunla Gallagher; Laura Cowley; Susan Channon; Michael Robling; David Williams; Clare Hughes; Simon Murphy; Lesley Lowes; John W Gregory Journal: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Date: 2017-12-18