Literature DB >> 27055219

Rebubbling Techniques for Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Ester Fernández López1, Lamis Baydoun, Nadine Gerber-Hollbach, Isabel Dapena, Vasilios S Liarakos, Lisanne Ham, Gerrit R J Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe rebubbling techniques in eyes with a visually significant graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis at a tertiary referral center. A total of 41 eyes (39 patients) received rebubbling: 39 eyes (37 patients) had 1 and 2 eyes had 2 rebubbling procedures. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and surgical videos were used to determine the best incisional approach for air injection, intraoperative maneuvers, and success rate (graft reattachment) at 1 week postoperatively.
RESULTS: Rebubbling was performed on average 26 (±21) days (range: 7-92 days) after DMEK. Graft edge visibility and configuration of graft detachment were important parameters for the incisional approach for air injection: the air cannula was introduced in the area of graft attachment (attached area approach) (n = 25) or detachment (detached area approach) (n = 16). After excluding upside-down grafts (n = 3), the rebubbling success rate in total was 87% (33/38 eyes); in the attached area approach, it was 92% (22/24 eyes); and in the detached area approach, it was 79% (11/14). Of 14 eyes that had rebubbling later than 1 month postoperatively, 11 were successful; in 8 eyes, the graft seemed too stiff and/or immobile to allow complete unfolding.
CONCLUSIONS: Rebubbling is a feasible procedure to manage graft detachment after DMEK if the graft is correctly oriented. Proper preoperative planning may aid in minimizing intraoperative complications and may increase the success rate. Late interventions (>1 month postoperatively) may still produce graft reattachment, but increased graft stiffness and/or fibrosis may complicate complete graft unfolding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27055219     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  5 in total

1.  A 20-year bibliometric analysis of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: from 2001 to 2020.

Authors:  Feng Lin; Luoli Zhang; Yimin Wang; Dan Fu; Yuliang Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Quantifying Graft Detachment after Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Friso G Heslinga; Mark Alberti; Josien P W Pluim; Javier Cabrerizo; Mitko Veta
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Comment on the Article: Management of Upside-Down Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series.

Authors:  Arjun Srirampur
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-12

4.  Eye bank versus surgeon prepared DMEK tissues: influence on adhesion and re-bubbling rate.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Ahmed Kazaili; Luca Pagano; Kunal Ajit Gadhvi; Mitchell Titley; Bernhard Steger; Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto; Alvaro Meana; Jesus Merayo-Lloves; Ponzin Diego; Riaz Akhtar; Hannah J Levis; Stefano Ferrari; Stephen B Kaye; Mohit Parekh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Influence of rebubbling on anterior segment parameters and refractive outcomes in eyes with DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Bishr Agha; Raimund Forster; Thomas Kohnen; Ingo Schmack
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.