Literature DB >> 27055117

Cost Attributable to Nosocomial Bacteremia. Analysis According to Microorganism and Antimicrobial Sensitivity in a University Hospital in Barcelona.

Marta Riu1,2, Pietro Chiarello1,2, Roser Terradas2,3, Maria Sala1,4,5, Enric Garcia-Alzorriz1, Xavier Castells1,4,5, Santiago Grau2,6, Francesc Cots1.   

Abstract

AIM: To calculate the incremental cost of nosocomial bacteremia caused by the most common organisms, classified by their antimicrobial susceptibility.
METHODS: We selected patients who developed nosocomial bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These microorganisms were analyzed because of their high prevalence and they frequently present multidrug resistance. A control group consisted of patients classified within the same all-patient refined-diagnosis related group without bacteremia. Our hospital has an established cost accounting system (full-costing) that uses activity-based criteria to analyze cost distribution. A logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the probability of developing bacteremia for each admission (propensity score) and was used for propensity score matching adjustment. Subsequently, the propensity score was included in an econometric model to adjust the incremental cost of patients who developed bacteremia, as well as differences in this cost, depending on whether the microorganism was multidrug-resistant or multidrug-sensitive.
RESULTS: A total of 571 admissions with bacteremia matched the inclusion criteria and 82,022 were included in the control group. The mean cost was € 25,891 for admissions with bacteremia and € 6,750 for those without bacteremia. The mean incremental cost was estimated at € 15,151 (CI, € 11,570 to € 18,733). Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa bacteremia had the highest mean incremental cost, € 44,709 (CI, € 34,559 to € 54,859). Antimicrobial-susceptible E. coli nosocomial bacteremia had the lowest mean incremental cost, € 10,481 (CI, € 8,752 to € 12,210). Despite their lower cost, episodes of antimicrobial-susceptible E. coli nosocomial bacteremia had a major impact due to their high frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment of hospital cost according to the organism causing bacteremia and antibiotic sensitivity could improve prevention strategies and allow their prioritization according to their overall impact and costs. Infection reduction is a strategy to reduce resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27055117      PMCID: PMC4824502          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Bacteremia is a severe infection with high mortality rates. Nosocomial bacteremia constitutes an important part of healthcare related infections. In a study conducted in 12 Spanish hospitals that aimed to evaluate the costs of adverse events, healthcare infections were the group with highest incremental costs, representing 64.2% of the total cost of episodes with adverse events [1]. Nosocomial bacteremia increases length of stay, hospital costs and mortality rates, as it can trigger more serious events such as septic shock, occasionally with multiple organ failure, and death. The incidence rate of nosocomial bacteremia has been estimated to be between 113 and 189/100,000 inhabitants per year, with an associated mortality of between 21 and 38/100,000 per year [2]. The additional per-patient cost at hospital level has been estimated at € 14,735 [3] or € 12,853 [4]. In a systematic review that analyzed variations in analytical methods to estimate the incremental costs of nosocomial infections, the results for nosocomial bacteremia varied from $ 5,875 to $ 86,500 [5]; this disparity reflects differences in patient characteristics, the type of infection, the causative microorganisms, and the calculation methods. Bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms has a worse prognosis than that is caused by antimicrobial-susceptible microorganisms, because multidrug resistance delays and reduces the choice of appropriate treatment. Consequently, adverse effects could be more frequent and the selected antimicrobials are usually more expensive and, due to their broader spectrum, could promote the development of new antimicrobial resistances [6-8]. Population-based studies have estimated the additional costs of antimicrobial resistance at $ 20 billion in the USA [9] and 1.5 billion annually in Europe, of which more than 900 million are direct hospital costs [10]. In the case of bacteremia, the excess cost of multidrug resistance has been estimated at $16,918 per patient [11]. Unfortunately, the prevalence of multidrug resistant microorganisms is constantly growing, despite various strategies for prevention, which is a concern for health professionals [9,10]. The excess cost associated with nosocomial bacteremia is avoidable and can be used as a measure of the impact of these infections. However, some authors have suggested that traditional methods overestimate the incremental cost due to the presence of various types of bias. First, the possibility of developing nosocomial bacteremia is due, in part, to length of exposure. Consequently, a longer hospital stay increases the risk of acquiring an infection. In addition, a hospital-acquired infection increases the length of stay, converting the length of stay into a variable directly related to a time-dependent bias [12-14]. Further biases can also be related to the lack of complete information on all confounding variables (default variable bias) or if the sample analyzed does not include adequate control cases (selection bias) [13-15]. The main source of cost is hospital analytical cost accounting, which includes the cost of all activities conducted in the process of providing healthcare to hospitalized patients and all relevant cost typologies [14,16]. Due to the difficulty of identifying the multitude of activities performed in a hospital, currently few hospitals have developed detailed per patient cost accounting. Consequently, most studies analyzing bacteremia costs are based on secondary estimates rather than real costs [5, 17,18]. These methodologies lose sensitivity in showing the variability of costs due to the specific circumstances that affect the type and number of activities performed in the treatment of each patient according to their characteristics and needs. The use of costs based on analytical cost accounting systems ensures that the variability of clinical practice is sufficiently captured in terms of resource use. A recently published study on the economic impact of adverse events showed the advantages and strengths of the use of activity-based costing and full costing techniques in healthcare economic evaluation [1]. Differentiating the incremental cost of bacteremia by microorganisms according to their antimicrobial sensitivity or resistance would contribute to a better understanding of the magnitude of the economic burden of resistance. In addition, such an analysis would help to evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives attempting to antimicrobial resistance and would provide valuable information on the areas that should be prioritized to control healthcare infections [19-22].

Objective

The main aim of the study was to calculate the incremental cost of nosocomial bacteremia caused by the most common organisms, classified by antibiotic sensitivity.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, a teaching hospital equipped with 400 beds that provides medical and surgical care and has a catchment area of 300,000 inhabitants. The study population consisted of patients admitted to the hospital from 2005 to 2012. All discharges were classified with the all-patient refined-diagnosis-related group (APR-DRG) v. 24.0 grouper. Admitted patients who developed nosocomial bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa and all control patients classified within the same APR-DRG groups were selected. These microorganisms were analyzed because of their high prevalence, and, in our environment, often have multidrug resistance. Nosocomial bacteremia was defined according to the Center for Disease Control definitions [23]. Magiorakos[24] criteria were used to identify multidrug resistant microorganisms (Table 1).
Table 1

Criteria used to identify multidrug-resistant microorganisms.

MicroorganismsAntimicrobial categoryAntimicrobial agents
AminoglycosidesAmikacin
Gentamicin
 Tobramycin
CarbapenemsErtapenem
E. coli*Imipenem
K. pneumoniae* Meropenem
1st or 2nd generation cephalosporinsCefazoline
 Cefuroxime
3rd or 4th generation cephalosporinsCefotaxime
Ceftazidime
  Cefepime
AminoglycosidesAmikacin
Gentamicin
 Tobramycin
MonobactamsAztreonam
Cephalosporins with antipseudomonal activityCeftazidime
P. aeruginosa* Cefepime
QuinolonesCiprofloxacin
 Levofloxacin
UreidopenicillinsPiperacillin + Tazobactam
CarbapenemsImipenem
 Meropenem
 PolymyxinsColistin
PenicillinsOxacillin
S. aureus**Cloxacillin
 Methicillin
 GlycopeptidesVancomycin

* Microorganisms were considered to be multidrug-resistant if identified as such by the microbiologist or if they had developed resistance to three or more antibiotics family.

** Microorganisms were considered to be multidrug-resistant if they developed resistance to one antibiotic family.

* Microorganisms were considered to be multidrug-resistant if identified as such by the microbiologist or if they had developed resistance to three or more antibiotics family. ** Microorganisms were considered to be multidrug-resistant if they developed resistance to one antibiotic family. Admissions grouped into non-specific APR-DRG were excluded. Patients with two or more episodes of bacteremia during the same hospital stay were also excluded because of their specific risk factors [25]. The dependent variable was the cost of the hospitalization episode. The main explanatory variable was the presence of nosocomial bacteremia. Additional study variables were age and sex, type of admission (emergency or elective), type of treatment (medical or surgical), discharge status (alive or deceased), admission diagnosis, the presence of complications, level of comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser index [1], intensive care unit (ICU) admission, per-patient cost previous to the bacteremia as a weighted measure of length of hospital stay prior to bacteremia detection and the cost weight of the adjacent APR-DRG group. The total costs of hospital admissions with nosocomial bacteremia caused by the selected microorganisms were analyzed by taking into account the antimicrobial susceptibility of each microorganism. This group of patients was compared with the control group. Clinical information on the hospitalization process of each patient included in the study was obtained from the minimum dataset of hospital discharges and from the hospital information system, which has an established cost accounting systems (full-costing) in which cost distribution is based on activity-based criteria[26]. All costs were adjusted to 2012 price levels according to the national price index published by Spain’s National Institute of Statistics [27]. Admissions with bacteremia were identified using the dataset collected by the infection control department, which prospectively follows up all episodes of bacteremia. A descriptive analysis was performed of all variables of admissions with and without bacteremia and of microorganism sensitivity. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and the comparison of mean values was performed using ANOVA test. A generalized linear model with binomial distribution and logit function was fitted to estimate, for each admission, the probability of developing bacteremia (propensity score) and was used for propensity score matching adjustment [14,28]. The model was specified the variables previously described with logarithmic transformations for the APR-DRG cost weight and for cost previous to the bacteremia. Subsequently, the propensity score was included in a generalized linear models with the Gamma distribution and the log link function to adjust the incremental cost of patients who developed bacteremia, as well as differences in this cost, depending on whether the microorganism was multidrug-resistant or multidrug-sensitive. The econometric model included the same variables used for the estimation of the propensity score (see S1 File for details). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar. Any patient-level data was anonymized, and no additional informed consent was required.

Results

There were 177,378 discharges in the study period, of which 0.96% had an episode of bacteremia (n = 1,703). Of these, 669 (39.3%) were episodes of nosocomial bacteremia caused by the above-mentioned microorganisms. Finally, 571 admissions with bacteremia met the inclusion criteria and 82,022 treated in the same period and grouped in the same APR-DRG who did not develop nosocomial bacteremia were included in the control group. Table 2 shows the characteristics of the selected episodes. At hospital admission, patients from both groups had similar levels of comorbidities (Elixhauser index) and requirements for surgical intervention, although patients who developed bacteremia were more likely to be admitted to the ICU and had higher mortality and resource consumption (measured by APR-DRG weight and average cost).
Table 2

Patients without and with bacteremia, characteristics, and average cost of the episode.

PatientsPatients with bacteremia
 without bacteremiamultidrug-sensitivemultidrug-resistentP-value
Number of patients82,022404167
Male sex (N, %)43,25652.724961.610160.5<0.000
Age (mean, SD)67.117.064.715.867.214.70.017
Urgent admission (N, %)53,17164.829172.012675.4<0.000
Surgical patient (N, %)34,53442.119347.86740.10.062
Intensive care unit admission (N, %)4,5085.512831.75130.5<0.000
Exitus (N, %)3,8524.711227.75231.1<0.000
Elixhauser index (mean, SD)2.61.92.61.72.81.90.428
APR-DRG weight (mean, SD)1.15390.84051.94352.29471.83102.0532<0.000
Length of hospital stay (mean, SD)10.810.332.228.037.224.4<0.000
Length of hospital stay prior to bacteremia (mean, SD)-14.515.218.513.4-
Total cost observed (mean, SD)6,7507,61924,96031,15428,14323,964<0.000

Abbreviation: APR-DRG = all-patient refined-diagnosis related group.

Abbreviation: APR-DRG = all-patient refined-diagnosis related group. Among the 571 episodes with bacteremia, the most frequently isolated microorganism was E. coli (184 episodes), followed by S. aureus (108 episodes). The least frequent microorganism was P. aeruginosa (86 episodes), which nevertheless showed the highest percentage (40.7%) of episodes with multidrug resistance. Overall, 29.2% of microorganisms showed multidrug resistance (Table 3). About 16% of nosocomial bacteremia were polymicrobial.
Table 3

Distribution of bacteremia according to the causative organism and its antibiotic sensitivity.

Multidrug-sensitiveMultidrug-resistant
 N%N%Total
S. aureus7064.83835.2108
E. coli14578.83921.2184
K. pneumoniae6967.63332.4102
P. aeruginosa5159.33540.786
Polimicrobial6975.82224.291
Total40470.816729.2571
The total cost was € 568,464,250. The 571 admissions with bacteremia represented 0.69% of analyzed admissions and 2.6% of total observed cost (Table 4).
Table 4

Average and total cost among all patients according to the causative organism and its antibiotic sensitivity.

Observed cost
PatientsN%meantotal
Without bacteremia82,02299.36,75553,680,489
With bacteremia5710.6925,89114,783,761
Total82,593100.06,883568,464,250
Microorganism group    
S. aureus (MDSM)7012.322,8511,599,541
S. aureus (MDRM)386.724,468929,792
E. coli (MDSM)14525.421,8833,173,003
E.coli (MDRM)396.816,754653,392
K. pneumoniae (MDSM)6912.125,2221,740,292
K. pneumoniae (MDRM)335.835,1001,158,312
P. aeruginosa (MDSM)518.930,2011,540,266
P. aeruginosa (MDRM)356.138,8721,360,505
Polymicrobial (MDSM)6912.129,4312,030,733
Polymicrobial (MDRM)223.927,179597,938
Total number of patients with bacteremia571100.025,89114,783,775

MDSM = multidrug-sensitive microorganism; MDRM = multidrug-resistant microorganism.

MDSM = multidrug-sensitive microorganism; MDRM = multidrug-resistant microorganism. The mean cost of admissions with bacteremia was € 25,891. Nosocomial bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa was the most costly with a mean observed cost of € 38,872; episodes caused by multidrug-resistant E. coli had the lowest mean cost, € 16,754 (Table 4). The mean incremental cost was estimated at € 15,151 (CI, € 11,570 to € 18,733) and was related to an increase of € 8,651,221 in total hospital costs. As shown in Table 5, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa bacteremia had the highest incremental cost, € 44,709 (CI € 34,559 to € 54,859). Despite being one of the less common microorganisms, P. aeruginosa had a substantial impact on total costs, amounting to € 1,564,817. The mean incremental cost was € 8,872 for multidrug-resistant E. coli bacteremia and was € 10,481 (CI € 8,752 to € 12,210) for antimicrobial-susceptible E. coli nosocomial bacteremia, which represented the second highest total cost (€ 1,519,735). Despite its lower mean incremental cost compared with other causative agents, antimicrobial-susceptible E. coli nosocomial bacteria had a major impact due to its high frequency.
Table 5

Average incremental cost and impact on cost of the distinct causative organisms and their antibiotic sensitivity.

PatientsIncremental costImpact on costs
Microorganism groupN%MeanConfidence intervalTotal%
S aureus (MSSA)7012,39.3507.21511.485654.5007,6
MRSA386,714.37210.42618.317546.1366,3
E coli (MDSM)14525,410.4818.75212.2101.519.74517,6
E coli (MDRM)396,88.8726.58811.155346.0084
K pneumoniae (MDSM)6912,113.86411.01916.709956.61611,1
K pneumoniae (MDRM)335,818.20812.66323.754600.8646,9
P aeruginosa (MDSM)518,916.04211.95620.127818.1429,5
P aeruginosa (MDRM)356,144.70934.55954.8591.564.81518,1
Polymicrobian (MDSM)6912,119.00914.91723.1001.311.62115,2
Polymicrobian (MDRM)223,915.1386.93223.344333.0363,8
Total57110015.15111.57018.7338.651.221100

MDSM = multidrug-sensitive microorganism; MDRM = multidrug-resistant microorganism.

MDSM = multidrug-sensitive microorganism; MDRM = multidrug-resistant microorganism. Multidrug-sensitive nosocomial polymicrobial bacteremia also had a major impact on cost, amounting to € 19,009 (CI € 14,917 to € 23,100 IC), and represented a total incremental cost of € 1,311,987.

Discussion

The 571 admissions developing nosocomial bacteremia during the 8 years analyzed increased total hospital costs by € 8,651,221, more than € 1,000,000 per year. The mean additional cost was € 15,151 per admission. Substantial differences were found between organisms. Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa bacteremia had the highest economic impact, with a mean incremental cost of € 44,709. The characteristics and implications of the S. aureus bacterium have been constantly studied since the first epidemic of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in the 1960s [29]. The observed costs related to multidrug-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) ranged from $ 9,839 to $ 59,245. Reported costs for MRSA have ranged from $ 11,045 to $ 84,436 [30,31]. A study analyzing patients with S. aureus bacteremia in 27 Spanish hospitals [31] reported that the cost of MSSA was € 9,839 and the cost of MRSA was € 11,044, slightly lower than those found in the present work. Two previous studies have evaluated the cost of MRSA bacteremia compared with MSSA bacteremia using propensity score matching techniques, although their findings are not clearly comparable with those of this study. The first [32] included community-acquired bacteremia in selected cases; the estimated cost was $ 8,355 (MSSA) vs. $ 9,369 (MRSA). The second [33] analyzed the cost of patients with and without ICU admission separately; among the former, those who developed MRSA bacteremia were associated with higher costs (with an odds ratio of 2 relative to MSSA), while non-ICU patients showed no significant difference in cost. E. coli was the most frequent bacteremia found in this study (32.2% of total episodes) and showed the lowest multidrug resistance (21.2%). Its mean incremental cost estimate was lower than those of other microorganisms but it had the second highest total economic impact due to its high frequency. The adjusted cost of multidrug-resistant E. coli was lower than that for multidrug-sensitive episodes. E. coli is one of the most frequent microorganisms causing bacteremia, whether hospital- or community-acquired [34-36], and has an increasing share of multidrug resistance [13, 36]. Nevertheless, very few studies have analyzed the impact of this microorganism on hospital cost. This could be because E. coli bacteremia usually results from urinary tract infections, which are generally low-severity and produce few complications. However, because of its frequency, this microorganism warrants study. In a systematic review of the economic impact of multidrug resistance [18], only one of the studies described the costs of E. coli bacteremia and found observed mean costs of € 13,709 for multidrug-resistant microorganism, € 8,683 for multi-sensitive microorganism and € 5,026 for those related to multidrug resistance; these costs are lower than those observed in our cohort with this organism, which can be explained by the inclusion of community-acquired bacteremia episodes. Other studies mentioned in the same review analyzed the costs of infections caused by E. coli and K. pneumoniae and included different types of infections, not only bacteremia. In our study, the mean observed cost was € 21,883 for E. coli multidrug-sensitive episodes, € 16,754 for multidrug-resistant episodes, € 25,222 for multidrug-sensitive K. pneumoniae episodes and € 35,100 for multidrug-resistant episodes. The results were considerably higher for K. pneumoniae episodes; consequently, although both microorganisms belong to the same family, their inclusion in the same study does not seem an appropriate strategy. The cost described in the above-mentioned review and attributable to multidrug resistance for both microorganisms ranged from $ 1,587 to $ 30,093. The authors attribute this substantial disparity to the differences in cost of living among the countries included in the study. We believe that this may explain some of the differences but that differences in the patients enrolled and in calculation methods may also have had an influence. An analysis of the cost of infections (except urinary tract infections) caused by E. coli and K. pneumoniae also found high incremental costs, with a mean cost of $ 41,353 for multidrug-resistant and $ 24,902 for multidrug-sensitive microorganisms [37]. Likewise, in patients with multidrug-resistant E. coli or K. pneumoniae nosocomial infection, Roberts et al [8] found a mean cost of $ 39,403, similar to our results for bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae (€ 35,100) but clearly higher than the mean cost of bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant E. coli (€ 16,754). P. aeruginosa was the microorganism with the highest proportion of multidrug resistance and also showed a higher estimated incremental cost for both multidrug-sensitive episodes (€ 16,042) and multidrug-resistant episodes (€ 44,709). These results are consistent with those found by our team in a previous study, in which the cost of infection/colonization by P. aeruginosa was € 4,933 for multidrug-sensitive episodes and € 12,351 for multidrug-resistant episodes, despite the lower costs in our study; however, in that study, bacteremia as well as infection and colonization were included in the cost analysis [22]. Findings from other studies show higher costs in patients infected with or colonized by P. aeruginosa. For episodes with imipenem-resistance the mean hospital post-culture cost was $ 251,495 for multidrug-resistant microorganisms and was $ 166,196 for multidrug-sensitive microorganisms [21]. Neidell et al [38] found an incremental cost of $ 25,300 for infection with multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa compared to multidrug-sensitive P aeruginosa. These results are very similar to the findings of the present study, since the estimated cost of nosocomial episodes of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa bacteremia was € 28,667 higher than that of multidrug-sensitive P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Nevertheless, the high levels of cost found in these analyses may be because most infections caused by P. aeruginosa occur in advanced stages of illness or in immunocompromised patients [21]. There is evidence that a significant proportion of nosocomial infections could be avoided. Findings from a review article suggest that the figure could be higher than 20% [39]. Some authors believe that the ability of experts to properly compare the effectiveness of prevention strategies for nosocomial infections is severely limited by the multiplicity of pathogens and the changing epidemiology of multidrug resistance in different centers [40]. As clearly shown in literature, several strategies to prevent nosocomial infections and reduce antibiotic resistance have been implemented [41-44]. Nevertheless, most of the reported experiences have been conducted in strongly controlled environments, such as ICUs, where, in the USA [45], a 58% reduction in nosocomial catheter-related bacteremia was estimated in 2008 compared with 2004. In addition, after application of specific hospital programs, two studies found decreases of 41.7% [42] and 73.9% [43] in bacteremia associated with central venous catheters. The success of clinical measures in reducing antimicrobial resistance has varied [9,10, 19] and some measures have had substantial success, such as in Denmark, where the rate of MRSA bacteremia decreased from 32% in 1968 to less than 2% in the last few years [29]. This study analyzed the hospital costs of all nosocomial bacteremia caused by the most common organisms in a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Barcelona. The aim was to expand the findings of other studies that included only a single microorganism in the analysis and which were often based on a single outbreak of bacteremia or on bacteremia in a single hospital area. The analytical structure of our study has limitations: first, we used information from a single hospital center, which could affect extrapolation of the results. Second, we excluded health care-associated bacteremia, which is always the result of a previous contact with the hospital. Thus, the episode of hospitalization represents an entirely avoidable cost. Finally, costs were calculated from the perspective of the hospital and inpatient care. The strength of this study lies in the exhaustiveness and thoroughness of the process of identifying bacteremia. Episodes were selected according to the protocols of the professionals involved in the infection control program and not by using administrative databases, as often occur in similar studies. It has been estimated that administrative-only information identifies only 20% of infections [46]. Importantly, this study analyzed real hospital costs elaborated with an activity-based costing system instead of tariffs or estimates from other sources. In line with the results of other authors [12,13], our results showed that length of hospital stay is an important factor that should always be taken into account and controlled for. Admissions with bacteremia, on average, developed the infection on the 14th day of stay while admissions without bacteremia had a mean length of stay of 10 days; in other words, admissions without bacteremia are discharged before the date when bacteremia usually develops. In this analysis we used a propensity-score matching approach to minimize potential time-dependent bias and selection bias. This study also highlights the importance of conducting interventions to control multidrug resistance, as conducted in some hospitals by implementing specific programs [47]. The adjustment of hospital cost for the organism causing bacteremia and for antibiotic sensitivity allows prevention strategies to be improved and prioritized according to their global impact and costs. Importantly, infection reduction is a strategy to reduce antimicrobial resistance.

Supporting information.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  39 in total

1.  Costs attributable to healthcare-acquired infection in hospitalized adults and a comparison of economic methods.

Authors:  Rebecca R Roberts; R Douglas Scott; Bala Hota; Linda M Kampe; Fauzia Abbasi; Shari Schabowski; Ibrar Ahmad; Ginevra G Ciavarella; Ralph Cordell; Steven L Solomon; Reidar Hagtvedt; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Cost of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Meredith Kilgore; Stephen Brossette
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Mortality and delay in effective therapy associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell J Schwaber; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Fitness cost: a bacteriological explanation for the demise of the first international methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic.

Authors:  Karen L Nielsen; Thomas M Pedersen; Klas I Udekwu; Andreas Petersen; Robert L Skov; Lars H Hansen; Diarmaid Hughes; Niels Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Approaches for preventing healthcare-associated infections: go long or go wide?

Authors:  Edward Septimus; Robert A Weinstein; Trish M Perl; Donald A Goldmann; Deborah S Yokoe
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Effect of healthcare-acquired infection on length of hospital stay and cost.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Diana Weinhold; Edward Tong; Frances Birrell; Shane Doidge; Prabha Ramritu; Kate Halton; David Lairson; Michael Whitby
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 8.  Impact of antimicrobial multidrug resistance on inpatient care cost: an evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Giannoula S Tansarli; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Anastasios Kapaskelis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship.

Authors:  Rebecca R Roberts; Bala Hota; Ibrar Ahmad; R Douglas Scott; Susan D Foster; Fauzia Abbasi; Shari Schabowski; Linda M Kampe; Ginevra G Ciavarella; Mark Supino; Jeremy Naples; Ralph Cordell; Stuart B Levy; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Hospital costs of nosocomial multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition.

Authors:  Eva Morales; Francesc Cots; Maria Sala; Mercè Comas; Francesc Belvis; Marta Riu; Margarita Salvadó; Santiago Grau; Juan P Horcajada; Maria Milagro Montero; Xavier Castells
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  13 in total

1.  Increased Costs Associated with Bloodstream Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Are Due Primarily to Patients with Hospital-Acquired Infections.

Authors:  Joshua T Thaden; Yanhong Li; Felicia Ruffin; Stacey A Maskarinec; Jonathan M Hill-Rorie; Lisa C Wanda; Shelby D Reed; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Incremental cost of nosocomial bacteremia according to the focus of infection and antibiotic sensitivity of the causative microorganism in a university hospital.

Authors:  Marta Riu; Pietro Chiarello; Roser Terradas; Maria Sala; Enric Garcia-Alzorriz; Xavier Castells; Santiago Grau; Francesc Cots
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 3.  How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Antonio Vena; Antony Croxatto; Elda Righi; Benoit Guery
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2018-05-29

4.  A multi-center nested case-control study on hospitalization costs and length of stay due to healthcare-associated infection.

Authors:  Yu Lü; Min Hong Cai; Jian Cheng; Kun Zou; Qian Xiang; Jia Yu Wu; Dao Qiong Wei; Zhong Hua Zhou; Hui Wang; Chen Wang; Jing Chen
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.887

5.  Estrategia de control de la resistencia bacteriana a los antimicrobianos en Argentina.

Authors:  Jaime Lazovski; Alejandra Corso; Fernando Pasteran; Mauricio Monsalvo; Julia Frenkel; Wanda Cornistein; Gonzalo Corral; Francisco Nacinovich
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2017-06-19

6.  Safety Evaluation of Individual Pillboxes to Control Cross-Contamination in the Drug Circuit in Hospitals.

Authors:  Claude Dussart; Caroline Boulliat; Isabelle Camal; Denis Bourgeois; Florence Carrouel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Self-disinfecting surfaces and infection control.

Authors:  Micaela Machado Querido; Lívia Aguiar; Paula Neves; Cristiana Costa Pereira; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 5.268

8.  Impact of multi-drug resistant bacteria on economic and clinical outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miquel Serra-Burriel; Matthew Keys; Carlos Campillo-Artero; Antonella Agodi; Martina Barchitta; Achilleas Gikas; Carlos Palos; Guillem López-Casasnovas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Pathogenesis of Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

Authors:  Caitlyn L Holmes; Mark T Anderson; Harry L T Mobley; Michael A Bachman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Prevalence of Multi-Resistant Microorganisms and Antibiotic Stewardship among Hospitalized Patients Living in Residential Care Homes in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mario Rivera-Izquierdo; Alberto Benavente-Fernández; Jairo López-Gómez; Antonio Jesús Láinez-Ramos-Bossini; Marta Rodríguez-Camacho; María Del Carmen Valero-Ubierna; Luis Miguel Martín-delosReyes; Eladio Jiménez-Mejías; Elena Moreno-Roldán; Pablo Lardelli-Claret; Virginia Martínez-Ruiz
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.