Literature DB >> 27054511

Pros and cons of implementing a carrier genetic test in an infertility practice.

Elisa Gil-Arribas1, Raquel Herrer, José Serna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Carrier screening is promptly evolving thanks to the rapid development of new technologies and mutation knowledge. Expanded carrier screening is already being used in assisted reproduction. Medical, ethical, psychological and legal aspects appear from the general public, patients, healthcare providers and scientific societies. Pros and cons of implementing this technique are highlighted. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent publications show the development of wider gene screening panels with lowering cost. Human genome is continually being updated as are the number of mutations and their corresponding phenotype known. Classical criteria established to consider a genetic screening protocol are nowadays overtaken, and scientific societies are developing guidelines and criteria adapted to expanded genetic testing. There is no universal agreement on the mutations that should be included in the panel. Patients' perceptions on carrier genetic testing seem to be positive. Counselling patients is of paramount importance stressing implications when testing positive on their clinical decision making. Gamete donor genetic testing implies a modified approach and blinded matching must be offered.
SUMMARY: There are important positive aspects implementing a carrier genetic test in assisted reproductive technique, but controversial issues appear. Reproductive providers must be appropriately aware and follow the new guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054511     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  2 in total

1.  The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Guido de Wert; Sanne van der Hout; Mariëtte Goddijn; Rita Vassena; Lucy Frith; Nathalie Vermeulen; Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-12

2.  Complications related to in vitro reproductive techniques support the implementation of natural procreative technologies.

Authors:  Aysha Karim Kiani; Stefano Paolacci; Pietro Scanzano; Sandro Michelini; Natale Capodicasa; Leonardo D'Agruma; Angelantonio Notarangelo; Gerolamo Tonini; Daniela Piccinelli; Kalantary Rad Farshid; Paolo Petralia; Ezio Fulcheri; Pietro Chiurazzi; Corrado Terranova; Francesco Plotti; Roberto Angioli; Marco Castori; Matteo Bertelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-11-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.