Literature DB >> 27054474

Time for considering constraints on procedural memory consolidation processes: Comment on Pan and Rickard (2015) with specific reference to developmental changes.

Esther Adi-Japha1, Avi Karni2.   

Abstract

In the acquisition of some motor skills, sleep may be necessary for the completion of procedural memory consolidation processes, as expressed in delayed "offline" performance gains. Pan and Rickard (2015) conducted an original meta-analysis of the literature on performing an explicitly instructed finger movement sequence and tested the role of sleep versus wake in the enhancement of performance over posttraining delay periods. In this comment we propose that a more-biological, process-oriented framework is needed, allowing for more than a yes-no answer to the question addressed, and suggest methodological issues that may affect the target meta-analysis. We argue that different task demands, task conditions, and developmental differences should be considered a priori rather than expected to emerge from pooled data. For example, several recent studies have indicated that there is a qualitative change in the time course of procedural memory consolidation processes at puberty, between the ages of 12 and 17. Before puberty, consolidation processes are reflected in enhancement of task performance over sleep and wake periods alike. In their extensive set of relevant empirical data the authors included a number of developmental studies comparing children with adults (expecting "child status" effects) but did not fully consider developmental changes. We show that the inclusion of the 6 studies of childhood, comprising 13 groups, biases the meta-analysis toward the conclusion that skill enhancement is similar across wake and sleep periods. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054474     DOI: 10.1037/bul0000048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  6 in total

1.  Cerebral Activity Associated with Transient Sleep-Facilitated Reduction in Motor Memory Vulnerability to Interference.

Authors:  Geneviève Albouy; Bradley R King; Christina Schmidt; Martin Desseilles; Thien Thanh Dang-Vu; Evelyne Balteau; Christophe Phillips; Christian Degueldre; Pierre Orban; Habib Benali; Philippe Peigneux; André Luxen; Avi Karni; Julien Doyon; Pierre Maquet; Maria Korman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Self-organized reactivation maintains and reinforces memories despite synaptic turnover.

Authors:  Michael Jan Fauth; Mark Cw van Rossum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  The impact of sleep on complex gross-motor adaptation in adolescents.

Authors:  Kathrin Bothe; Franziska Hirschauer; Hans-Peter Wiesinger; Janina Edfelder; Georg Gruber; Juergen Birklbauer; Kerstin Hoedlmoser
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.981

4.  Gamified Motor Training With Tangible Robots in Older Adults: A Feasibility Study and Comparison With the Young.

Authors:  Arzu Guneysu Ozgur; Maximilian J Wessel; Jennifer K Olsen; Wafa Johal; Ayberk Ozgur; Friedhelm C Hummel; Pierre Dillenbourg
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Skill-learning by observation-training with patients after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Einat Avraham; Yaron Sacher; Rinatia Maaravi-Hesseg; Avi Karni; Ravid Doron
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Variable training but not sleep improves consolidation of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Benjamin Thürer; Frederik D Weber; Jan Born; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.