Literature DB >> 27054449

Vertebral Endplate Cyst as a Predictor of Nonunion After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages.

Shimei Tanida1, Shunsuke Fujibayashi1, Bungo Otsuki1, Kazutaka Masamoto1, Yoshimitsu Takahashi2, Takeo Nakayama2, Shuichi Matsuda1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The bone union rate after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) using titanium (Ti) or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages was investigated retrospectively.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the PEEK cage is superior to the Ti cage in terms of bone union after LIF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We previously reported that the formation of vertebral endplate cysts is useful for predicting nonunion after LIF using Ti cages.
METHODS: We examined 144 levels in 117 patients treated from March 2005 to July 2012 with transforaminal LIF using Ti (93 levels in 77 patients) or PEEK cages (51 levels in 40 patients) with pedicle screw fixation. Using computed tomography, vertebral endplate cyst (cyst sign) was evaluated at 3 months, and bone union status was evaluated at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The relationship between cyst sign and union status was analyzed statistically. The bone union rate and the accuracy of the cyst sign were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The postoperative bone union rate was 75.2% and 74.5% at 1 year, and 82.8% and 80.4% at 2 years for Ti and PEEK groups, respectively. The rate of positive cyst sign was 17.2% and 13.7%, respectively. The nonunion rate with positive cyst sign was 100% and 100% at 1 year, and 56.2% and 71.4% at 2 years, respectively. Calculated for the cyst sign and union status, the sensitivity was 69.6% and 53.8%, and the specificity was 100% and 100%, respectively. There were no significant differences in bone union rate, rate of positive cyst sign, nonunion rate with positive cyst sign, sensitivity, and specificity between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The cyst sign was useful for predicting nonunion after LIF using PEEK or Ti cages. The bone union rate after LIF did not differ significantly between the two groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054449     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Do-Yeon Kim; O-Hyuk Kwon; Jeong-Yoon Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

2.  Factors important in bone union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the cortical bone trajectory technique.

Authors:  Yoshihide Yanai; Keitaro Matsukawa; Takashi Kato; Yoshiyuki Yato
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Cage subsidence in lateral interbody fusion with transpsoas approach: intraoperative endplate injury or late-onset settling.

Authors:  Kotaro Satake; Tokumi Kanemura; Hiroaki Nakashima; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Naoki Segi; Jun Ouchida
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-11-27

4.  Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Elie Massaad; Nida Fatima; Ali Kiapour; Muhamed Hadzipasic; Ganesh M Shankar; John H Shin
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

5.  Vertebral Endplate Cyst Formation in Relation to Properties of Interbody Cages.

Authors:  Manabu Sasaki; Masao Umegaki; Takanori Fukunaga; Yasukazu Hijikata; Yohei Banba; Katsumi Matsumoto; Yasuyoshi Miyao
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takenaka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

7.  In vivo experimental study of anterior cervical fusion using bioactive polyetheretherketone in a canine model.

Authors:  Takayoshi Shimizu; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Seiji Yamaguchi; Bungo Otsuki; Yaichiro Okuzu; Tomiharu Matsushita; Tadashi Kokubo; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.