Literature DB >> 27054272

A long-term noninterventional safety study of adjunctive lacosamide therapy in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

Bernhard J Steinhoff1, Klaus Eckhardt2, Pamela Doty3, Marc De Backer4, Marcus Brunnert5, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage6.   

Abstract

This noninterventional, observational, postauthorization safety study (SP0942, NCT00771927) evaluated the incidence of predefined cardiovascular- (CV) and psychiatric-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, when initiating adjunctive therapy with lacosamide or another approved antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard medical practice. Active recording of predefined TEAEs of interest took place at three-monthly recommended visits for up to 12months. Of 1004 patients who received at least one dose of adjunctive AEDs, 511 initially added lacosamide therapy, 493 added another AED, 69 were ≥65years of age, and 72 took concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients in the lacosamide cohort had a higher median frequency of partial-onset seizures (6.0 versus 3.5 per 28days) despite taking more concomitant AEDs (84.9% versus 66.9% took ≥2) at baseline. Patients who added lacosamide took a modal dose of 200mg/day over the treatment period (n=501), and 50.1% (256/511) completed 12months of treatment. Fifty-one point nine percent (256/493) of patients who added another AED completed the study, with the most commonly added AED being levetiracetam (28.4%). Four patients (0.8%) in each cohort, all <65years of age, reported predefined CV-related TEAEs. None were considered serious or led to discontinuation. One event each of sinus bradycardia (lacosamide), atrioventricular block first degree (lacosamide), and syncope (other AED) were judged to be treatment-related. Another patient in the other AED cohort reported bradycardia while taking concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Predefined psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by 21 patients (4.1%) in the lacosamide cohort and 27 patients (5.5%) in the other AED cohort. Depression was the most common to be treatment-related (7/11 and 12/18 of patients reporting treatment-related psychiatric TEAEs, respectively). Serious psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by four patients who added lacosamide (two cases of depression, two of suicide attempt) and one who added another AED (depression). Seven deaths occurred, all of which were considered unrelated/unlikely related to study medication. This thorough evaluation revealed a low incidence of predefined CV- and psychiatric-related TEAEs in patients taking adjunctive AED therapy according to standard medical practice. No specific safety concerns related to adjunctive lacosamide therapy were noted.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse reactions; Cardiovascular system; Consumer product safety; Drug-related side effects; Postmarketing product surveillance; Psychiatry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054272     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comparing Safety and Efficacy of "Third-Generation" Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment.

Authors:  Charlotte S Kwok; Emily L Johnson; Gregory L Krauss
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Lacosamide in patients with gliomas and uncontrolled seizures: results from an observational study.

Authors:  Roberta Rudà; Alessia Pellerino; Federica Franchino; Cinzia Bertolotti; Francesco Bruno; Francesca Mo; Enrica Migliore; Gianni Ciccone; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  The efficacy of lacosamide as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy and its use in status epilepticus: clinical trial evidence and experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Laurent M Willems; Esther Paule; Christine Petschow; Johann Philipp Zöllner; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 6.570

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures.

Authors:  Viktor Farkas; Barbara Steinborn; J Robert Flamini; Ying Zhang; Nancy Yuen; Simon Borghs; Ali Bozorg; Tony Daniels; Paul Martin; Hannah C Carney; Svetlana Dimova; Ingrid E Scheffer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  The effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatment in glioma patients: lamotrigine versus lacosamide.

Authors:  Mark P van Opijnen; Pim B van der Meer; Linda Dirven; Marta Fiocco; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Johan A F Koekkoek
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  PROVE: Retrospective, non-interventional, Phase IV study of perampanel in real-world clinical care of patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert T Wechsler; James Wheless; Muhammad Zafar; Graham R Huesmann; Marcelo Lancman; Eric Segal; Michael Chez; Sami Aboumatar; Anna Patten; Alejandro Salah; Manoj Malhotra
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2022-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.