Literature DB >> 27054151

Data for increase of Lymantria dispar male survival after topical application of single-stranded RING domain fragment of IAP-3 gene of its nuclear polyhedrosis virus.

Volodymyr V Oberemok1, Kateryna V Laikova2, Aleksei S Zaitsev1, Vladimir A Gushchin3, Oleksii A Skorokhod4.   

Abstract

This data article is related to the research article entitled "The RING for gypsy moth control: topical application of fragment of its nuclear polyhedrosis virus anti-apoptosis gene as insecticide" [1]. This article reports on significantly higher survival of gypsy moth Lymantria dispar male individuals in response to topical application of single-stranded DNA, based on RING (really interesting new gene) domain fragment of LdMNPV (L. dispar multicapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus) IAP-3 (inhibitor of apoptosis) gene and acted as DNA insecticide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA insecticides; Gypsy moth Lymantria dispar; Insecticide resistance; Lymantria dispar multicapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus; Pest management; RING (really interesting new gene); Viral IAP genes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054151      PMCID: PMC4796710          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Value of the data

The data for the first time show that topical application of single-stranded DNA from RING domain of LdMNPV IAP-3 gene leads to the significantly higher survival of Lymantria dispar male imago individuals, preferentially targeting the female imago individuals. The data, in our opinion, describe the consequence for previously observed decreased accumulation of biomass of caterpillars, miss-regulated expression of apoptosis and anti-apoptosis genes, calcium and magnesium imbalance and increased alkaline phosphatase activity in gypsy moth cells after treatment with RING domain fragment which targeted female individuals stronger than males [1]. Data on selective survival of Lymantria dispar male individuals in response to RING DNA insecticide may be of interest for plant protection approaches. The data support the concept that DNA insecticides could have the number of advantages in creation of insecticides based on nucleic acids in comparison with RNA interference approach [1], [2], [3] and could resolve or improve insecticide resistance problem [1], [4].

Data

Data for Lymantria dispar male survival after topical application of different single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) fragments are presented in Fig. 1 as survived male imago frequency.
Fig. 1

The frequency of male gypsy moths survived after DNA insecticide treatment in control (CTRL), BIR (baculoviral IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) repeat) and RING (really interesting new gene) groups. Mean and standard errors are presented. Significance of difference versus CTRL is indicated by * for p<0.05 (chi-squared test χ2 value is 4.09).

Experimental design, materials and methods

Treatment technique

In average, 20–25 2nd instar caterpillars from each of three Crimean locations were used per each control and experimental groups for the treatment with ssDNA (for details see [1] and the section “Sequences of the applied DNA fragments”). Each experiment was performed in 4 replicates (thus 80–100 caterpillars were included for each treatment group). A water solution with ssDNA (10 pmol/μl, either BIR or RING) was applied topically on caterpillars via fine spraying (2–3 pmol of ssDNA per caterpillar) [1].

Insect rearing

Control and treated with ssDNA gypsy moth caterpillars were grown in Petri dishes on oak leaves (Quercus robur) at temperature 25 °C until pupation. On emergence of imago from pupae, the numbers of adult male and female moths were counted [1].

Sequences of the applied DNA fragments

We designed DNA fragments as described in [1], [2], [5], [6]. DNA fragments were synthesized by Metabion International AG (Germany). The sequences of the applied single-stranded DNA fragments were the following: (1) 5′-GCC GGC GGA ACT GGC CCA-3′ (134843–134860; sense strand; BIR domain; control group) and (2) 5′-CGA CGT GGT GGC ACG GCG-3′ (135159135142; antisense strand; RING domain; experimental group).

Statistical analysis

Non-parametric Pearson׳s chi-squared test (χ2) and Mann–Whitney test to evaluate the significance of difference between the groups’ means (Sofa Statistics 1.3.3 software) were applied.
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaPesticide biochemistry and physiology, plant protection, creation of insecticides
Type of dataHistogram
How data was acquiredCount of survived male individuals
Data formatProcessed data
Experimental factorsLymantria dispar larvae were reared on Quercus robur leaves in the laboratory until imago stage. The count of survived male individuals was performed for parameter assessment.
Experimental featuresDistinction of male and female imago individuals is based on morphological difference.
Data source locationV.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea
Data accessibilityData are provided with this article
  3 in total

Review 1.  RNA interference: Applications and advances in insect toxicology and insect pest management.

Authors:  Young Ho Kim; Moustapha Soumaila Issa; Anastasia M W Cooper; Kun Yan Zhu
Journal:  Pestic Biochem Physiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.963

2.  Characterization of the transcriptome of the Asian gypsy moth Lymantria dispar identifies numerous transcripts associated with insecticide resistance.

Authors:  ChuanWang Cao; LiLi Sun; RongRong Wen; QingLi Shang; Ling Ma; ZhiYing Wang
Journal:  Pestic Biochem Physiol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Single-stranded DNA fragments of insect-specific nuclear polyhedrosis virus act as selective DNA insecticides for gypsy moth control.

Authors:  Volodymyr V Oberemok; Oleksii A Skorokhod
Journal:  Pestic Biochem Physiol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.963

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Molecular Alliance of Lymantria dispar Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Short Unmodified Antisense Oligonucleotide of Its Anti-Apoptotic IAP-3 Gene: A Novel Approach for Gypsy Moth Control.

Authors:  Volodymyr V Oberemok; Kateryna V Laikova; Aleksei S Zaitsev; Maksym N Shumskykh; Igor N Kasich; Nikita V Gal'chinsky; Viktoriya V Bekirova; Valentin V Makarov; Alexey A Agranovsky; Vladimir A Gushchin; Ilya V Zubarev; Anatoly V Kubyshkin; Iryna I Fomochkina; Mikhail V Gorlov; Oleksii A Skorokhod
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.