Christine E Kistler1,2, Sheryl Zimmerman2,3, Kimberly T Ward2, David Reed2, Carol Golin2,4, Carmen L Lewis5. 1. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 3. School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 4. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 5. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: Older adults in residential care and assisted living (RC/AL) are less healthy than the general elderly population, and some have needs similar to those in nursing homes, making this an important group in which to assess potential overuse or underuse of preventive services. We determined the health status of RC/AL residents and distinguished characteristics between those who may and may not benefit from preventive services requiring a life expectancy ≥5 years. Design and Methods: Cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of RC/AL residents using 2010 data from the National Survey of Residential Care Facilities. The primary outcome was the weighted frequency distribution of health states using three predictive mortality indices: Charlson Comorbidity Index, 4-year mortality index, and 9-year mortality index. Results: A total of 666,700 of 733,300 (weighted) residents met criteria for inclusion. Based on the three indices, 10%-15% were in good health, 11%-70% in intermediate health, and 20%-76% in poor health. Implications: Using triangulation between 3 well-validated mortality indices, 10%-15% of RC/AL residents are in good health and highly likely to benefit from preventive services that require ≥5 year life expectancy. In addition, many residents have uncertain benefit and would benefit from shared decision making.
Purpose of the Study: Older adults in residential care and assisted living (RC/AL) are less healthy than the general elderly population, and some have needs similar to those in nursing homes, making this an important group in which to assess potential overuse or underuse of preventive services. We determined the health status of RC/AL residents and distinguished characteristics between those who may and may not benefit from preventive services requiring a life expectancy ≥5 years. Design and Methods: Cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of RC/AL residents using 2010 data from the National Survey of Residential Care Facilities. The primary outcome was the weighted frequency distribution of health states using three predictive mortality indices: Charlson Comorbidity Index, 4-year mortality index, and 9-year mortality index. Results: A total of 666,700 of 733,300 (weighted) residents met criteria for inclusion. Based on the three indices, 10%-15% were in good health, 11%-70% in intermediate health, and 20%-76% in poor health. Implications: Using triangulation between 3 well-validated mortality indices, 10%-15% of RC/AL residents are in good health and highly likely to benefit from preventive services that require ≥5 year life expectancy. In addition, many residents have uncertain benefit and would benefit from shared decision making.
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Philip D Sloane; J Kevin Eckert; J Richard Hebel; Leslie A Morgan; Sally C Stearns; Judith Wildfire; Jay Magaziner; Cory Chen; Thomas R Konrad Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2003-04
Authors: Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Elizabeth Galik; Marie Boltz; Sarah Holmes; Steven Fix; Regina Lewis; Erin Vigne Journal: Clin Nurs Res Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 2.075
Authors: Christine E Kistler; Carol Golin; Carolyn Morris; Alexandra F Dalton; Russell P Harris; Rowena Dolor; Renée M Ferrari; Noel T Brewer; Carmen L Lewis Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 2.486