Literature DB >> 27053452

Potential of using cerium oxide nanoparticles for protecting healthy tissue during accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).

Zi Ouyang1, Madan Kumar Mainali2, Neeharika Sinha3, Guinevere Strack4, Yucel Altundal4, Yao Hao4, Thomas Andrew Winningham5, Erno Sajo4, Jonathan Celli2, Wilfred Ngwa6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using cerium oxide nanoparticles (CONPs) as radical scavengers during accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) to protect normal tissue. We hypothesize that CONPs can be slowly released from the routinely used APBI balloon applicators-via a degradable coating-and protect the normal tissue on the border of the lumpectomy cavity over the duration of APBI. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we analytically calculated the initial concentration of CONPs required to protect normal breast tissue from reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the time required for the particles to diffuse to various distances from the lumpectomy wall. Given that cerium has a high atomic number, we took into account the possible inadvertent dose enhancement that could occur due to the photoelectric interactions with radiotherapy photons. To protect against a typical MammoSite treatment fraction of 3.4Gy, 5ng·g(-1) of CONPs is required to scavenge hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide. Using 2nm sized NPs, with an initial concentration of 1mg·g(-1), we found that 2-10days of diffusion is required to obtain desired concentrations of CONPs in regions 1-2cm away from the lumpectomy wall. The resultant dose enhancement factor (DEF) is less than 1.01 under such conditions. Our results predict that CONPs can be employed for radioprotection during APBI using a new design in which balloon applicators are coated with the NPs for sustained/controlled in-situ release from within the lumpectomy cavity.
Copyright © 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APBI; Cerium oxide; Radiolysis; Radioprotectant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27053452      PMCID: PMC4950863          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  20 in total

1.  Synthesis of biocompatible dextran-coated nanoceria with pH-dependent antioxidant properties.

Authors:  J Manuel Perez; Atul Asati; Sudip Nath; Charalambos Kaittanis
Journal:  Small       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Ce³+ ions determine redox-dependent anti-apoptotic effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ivana Celardo; Milena De Nicola; Corrado Mandoli; Jens Z Pedersen; Enrico Traversa; Lina Ghibelli
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Absorption of 20-eV to 50,000-eV electron beams in air and plastic.

Authors:  A Cole
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Antioxidant properties of cerium oxide nanocrystals as a function of nanocrystal diameter and surface coating.

Authors:  Seung Soo Lee; Wensi Song; Minjung Cho; Hema L Puppala; Phuc Nguyen; Huiguang Zhu; Laura Segatori; Vicki L Colvin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Surface-charge-dependent cell localization and cytotoxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Atul Asati; Santimukul Santra; Charalambos Kaittanis; J Manuel Perez
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 6.  Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Mark W Saunders; Christian M Langton
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Potential for enhancing external beam radiotherapy for lung cancer using high-Z nanoparticles administered via inhalation.

Authors:  Yao Hao; Yucel Altundal; Michele Moreau; Erno Sajo; Rajiv Kumar; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Cerium oxide nanoparticles: influence of the high-Z component revealed on radioresistant 9L cell survival under X-ray irradiation.

Authors:  Adam Briggs; Stéphanie Corde; Sianne Oktaria; Ryan Brown; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Michael Lerch; Konstantin Konstantinov; Moeava Tehei
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect gastrointestinal epithelium from radiation-induced damage by reduction of reactive oxygen species and upregulation of superoxide dismutase 2.

Authors:  Jimmie Colon; Nelson Hsieh; Amber Ferguson; Patrick Kupelian; Sudipta Seal; D Wayne Jenkins; Cheryl H Baker
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  Sensitization of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation by cerium oxide nanoparticle-induced ROS production.

Authors:  Melissa S Wason; Jimmie Colon; Soumen Das; Sudipta Seal; James Turkson; Jihe Zhao; Cheryl H Baker
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 5.307

View more
  9 in total

1.  Nanoparticle-aided external beam radiotherapy leveraging the Čerenkov effect.

Authors:  Zi Ouyang; Bo Liu; Sayeda Yasmin-Karim; Erno Sajo; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 2.  Smart Radiation Therapy Biomaterials.

Authors:  Wilfred Ngwa; Francis Boateng; Rajiv Kumar; Darrell J Irvine; Silvia Formenti; Twalib Ngoma; Carsten Herskind; Marlon R Veldwijk; Georg Lars Hildenbrand; Michael Hausmann; Frederik Wenz; Juergen Hesser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Cerium Oxide Nanoparticle Administration to Skeletal Muscle Cells under Different Gravity and Radiation Conditions.

Authors:  Giada Graziana Genchi; Andrea Degl'Innocenti; Chiara Martinelli; Matteo Battaglini; Daniele De Pasquale; Mirko Prato; Sergio Marras; Giammarino Pugliese; Filippo Drago; Alessandro Mariani; Michele Balsamo; Valfredo Zolesi; Gianni Ciofani
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 4.  Metal-based NanoEnhancers for Future Radiotherapy: Radiosensitizing and Synergistic Effects on Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Pengcheng Zhang; Feifei Li; Xiaodong Jin; Jin Li; Weiqiang Chen; Qiang Li
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  Occurrence of pneumonitis following radiotherapy of breast cancer - A prospective study.

Authors:  Danijela Vasiljevic; Christoph Arnold; David Neuman; Katharina Fink; Marina Popovscaia; Irma Kvitsaridze; Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel; Markus Glatzer; Peter Lukas; Thomas Seppi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Nanoparticle induced barrier function assessment at liquid-liquid and air-liquid interface in novel human lung epithelia cell lines.

Authors:  Lars Leibrock; Sandra Wagener; Ajay Vikram Singh; Peter Laux; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 7.  Chemical Mechanisms of Nanoparticle Radiosensitization and Radioprotection: A Review of Structure-Function Relationships Influencing Reactive Oxygen Species.

Authors:  Douglas Howard; Sonia Sebastian; Quy Van-Chanh Le; Benjamin Thierry; Ivan Kempson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  An overview on recent in vivo biological application of cerium oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj; Bing-Huei Chen
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.598

Review 9.  CeO2 Nanoparticle-Containing Polymers for Biomedical Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Alexander B Shcherbakov; Vladimir V Reukov; Alexander V Yakimansky; Elena L Krasnopeeva; Olga S Ivanova; Anton L Popov; Vladimir K Ivanov
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.329

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.