Andrea N Edginton1, Eric I Zimmerman2, Aksana Vasilyeva2, Sharyn D Baker2,3, John C Panetta4. 1. School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. 3. Division of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. carl.panetta@stjude.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study used uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to evaluate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of the complex mechanisms of sorafenib and its two main metabolites, sorafenib glucuronide and sorafenib N-oxide in mice. METHODS: A PBPK model for sorafenib and its two main metabolites was developed to explain disposition in mice. It included relevant influx (Oatp) and efflux (Abcc2 and Abcc3) transporters, hepatic metabolic enzymes (CYP3A4 and UGT1A9), and intestinal β-glucuronidase. Parameterization of drug-specific processes was based on in vitro, ex vivo, and in silico data along with plasma and liver pharmacokinetic data from single and multiple transporter knockout mice. RESULTS: Uncertainty analysis demonstrated that the model structure and parameter values could explain the observed variability in the pharmacokinetic data. Global sensitivity analysis demonstrated the global effects of metabolizing enzymes on sorafenib and metabolite disposition and the local effects of transporters on their respective substrate exposures. In addition, through hypothesis testing, the model supported that the influx transporter Oatp is a weak substrate for sorafenib and a strong substrate for sorafenib glucuronide and that the efflux transporter Abcc2 is not the only transporter affected in the Abcc2 knockout mouse. CONCLUSIONS: Translation of the mouse model to humans for the purpose of explaining exceptionally high human pharmacokinetic variability and its relationship with exposure-dependent dose-limiting toxicities will require delineation of the importance of these processes on disposition.
PURPOSE: This study used uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to evaluate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of the complex mechanisms of sorafenib and its two main metabolites, sorafenib glucuronide and sorafenib N-oxide in mice. METHODS: A PBPK model for sorafenib and its two main metabolites was developed to explain disposition in mice. It included relevant influx (Oatp) and efflux (Abcc2 and Abcc3) transporters, hepatic metabolic enzymes (CYP3A4 and UGT1A9), and intestinal β-glucuronidase. Parameterization of drug-specific processes was based on in vitro, ex vivo, and in silico data along with plasma and liver pharmacokinetic data from single and multiple transporter knockout mice. RESULTS: Uncertainty analysis demonstrated that the model structure and parameter values could explain the observed variability in the pharmacokinetic data. Global sensitivity analysis demonstrated the global effects of metabolizing enzymes on sorafenib and metabolite disposition and the local effects of transporters on their respective substrate exposures. In addition, through hypothesis testing, the model supported that the influx transporter Oatp is a weak substrate for sorafenib and a strong substrate for sorafenib glucuronide and that the efflux transporter Abcc2 is not the only transporter affected in the Abcc2 knockout mouse. CONCLUSIONS: Translation of the mouse model to humans for the purpose of explaining exceptionally high human pharmacokinetic variability and its relationship with exposure-dependent dose-limiting toxicities will require delineation of the importance of these processes on disposition.
Authors: Hiroto Inaba; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Lie Li; Brian D Furmanski; Gerard P Mascara; Kenneth M Heym; Robbin Christensen; Mihaela Onciu; Sheila A Shurtleff; Stanley B Pounds; Ching-Hon Pui; Raul C Ribeiro; Dario Campana; Sharyn D Baker Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sussan Ghassabian; Tristan Rawling; Fanfan Zhou; Munikumar R Doddareddy; Bruce N Tattam; David E Hibbs; Robert J Edwards; Pei H Cui; Michael Murray Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Shuiying Hu; Zhaoyuan Chen; Ryan Franke; Shelley Orwick; Ming Zhao; Michelle A Rudek; Alex Sparreboom; Sharyn D Baker Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brandon Swift; Noelia Nebot; Jin Kyung Lee; Tianxiang Han; William R Proctor; Dhiren R Thakker; Dieter Lang; Martin Radtke; Mark J Gnoth; Kim L R Brouwer Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Maria L H Vlaming; Zeliha Pala; Anita van Esch; Els Wagenaar; Olaf van Tellingen; Dirk R de Waart; Ronald P J Oude Elferink; Koen van de Wetering; Alfred H Schinkel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hani Zaher; Henriette E Meyer zu Schwabedissen; Rommel G Tirona; Melissa L Cox; Leslie A Obert; Nidhi Agrawal; Joe Palandra; Jeffrey L Stock; Richard B Kim; Joseph A Ware Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Antonius A Miller; Daryl J Murry; Kouros Owzar; Donna R Hollis; Erin B Kennedy; Ghassan Abou-Alfa; Apurva Desai; Jimmy Hwang; Miguel A Villalona-Calero; E Claire Dees; Lionel D Lewis; Marwan G Fakih; Martin J Edelman; Fred Millard; Richard C Frank; Raymond J Hohl; Mark J Ratain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Li Gong; Marilyn M Giacomini; Craig Giacomini; Michael L Maitland; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Hiroto Inaba; John C Panetta; Stanley B Pounds; Lei Wang; Lie Li; Fariba Navid; Sara M Federico; Eric D Eisenmann; Aksana Vasilyeva; Yong-Dong Wang; Sheila Shurtleff; Ching-Hon Pui; Tanja A Gruber; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Sharyn D Baker Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Anne M Talkington; Morgan D McSweeney; Timothy Wessler; Marielle K Rath; Zibo Li; Tao Zhang; Hong Yuan; Jonathan E Frank; M Gregory Forest; Yanguang Cao; Samuel K Lai Journal: J Control Release Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 11.467
Authors: Tao Liu; Vijay Ivaturi; Philip Sabato; Jogarao V S Gobburu; Jacqueline M Greer; John J Wright; B Douglas Smith; Keith W Pratz; Michelle A Rudek Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Samantha M Ervin; Ronan P Hanley; Lauren Lim; William G Walton; Kenneth H Pearce; Aadra P Bhatt; Lindsey I James; Matthew R Redinbo Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 4.634