Literature DB >> 27053011

Relationship between office and home blood pressure with increasing age: The International Database of HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDHOCO).

Angeliki Ntineri1, George S Stergiou1, Lutgarde Thijs2, Kei Asayama3,4, José Boggia5, Nadia Boubouchairopoulou1, Atsushi Hozawa6, Yutaka Imai3, Jouni K Johansson7, Antti M Jula7, Anastasios Kollias1, Leonella Luzardo5, Teemu J Niiranen7, Kyoko Nomura4, Takayoshi Ohkubo3,4, Ichiro Tsuji8, Christophe Tzourio9,10, Fang-Fei Wei2, Jan A Staessen2,11.   

Abstract

Home blood pressure (HBP) measurements are known to be lower than conventional office blood pressure (OBP) measurements. However, this difference might not be consistent across the entire age range and has not been adequately investigated. We assessed the relationship between OBP and HBP with increasing age using the International Database of HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDHOCO). OBP, HBP and their difference were assessed across different decades of age. A total of 5689 untreated subjects aged 18-97 years, who had at least two OBP and HBP measurements, were included. Systolic OBP and HBP increased across older age categories (from 112 to 142 mm Hg and from 109 to 136 mm Hg, respectively), with OBP being higher than HBP by ∼7 mm Hg in subjects aged >30 years and lesser in younger subjects (P=0.001). Both diastolic OBP and HBP increased until the age of ∼50 years (from 71 to 79 mm Hg and from 66 to 76 mm Hg, respectively), with OBP being consistently higher than HBP and a trend toward a decreased OBP-HBP difference with aging (P<0.001). Determinants of a larger OBP-HBP difference were younger age, sustained hypertension, nonsmoking and negative cardiovascular disease history. These data suggest that in the general adult population, HBP is consistently lower than OBP across all the decades, but their difference might vary between age groups. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in younger and older subjects and in hypertensive individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27053011     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2016.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  32 in total

1.  Relationships among blood pressures obtained using different measurement methods in the general population of Ohasama, Japan.

Authors:  Y Imai; T Ohkubo; I Tsuji; A Hozawa; K Nagai; M Kikuya; A Aihara; M Sekino; M Michimata; M Matsubara; S Ito; H Satoh; S Hisamichi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Changing relationship among clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure with increasing age.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Angeliki Ntineri; Anastasios Kollias; Antonios Destounis; Efthimia Nasothimiou; Leonidas Roussias
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-24

3.  Optimal number of days for home blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Teemu J Niiranen; Kei Asayama; Lutgarde Thijs; Jouni K Johansson; Azusa Hara; Atsushi Hozawa; Ichiro Tsuji; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Antti M Jula; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Masked hypertension in the elderly: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based sample.

Authors:  Cécilia Cacciolati; Olivier Hanon; Annick Alpérovitch; Carole Dufouil; Christophe Tzourio
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Determinants of masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study.

Authors:  Marjo-Riitta A Hänninen; Teemu J Niiranen; Pauli J Puukka; Aino K Mattila; Antti M Jula
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Home blood pressure is associated with depressive symptoms in an elderly population aged 70 years and over: a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Kaijun Niu; Atsushi Hozawa; Shuichi Awata; Hui Guo; Shinichi Kuriyama; Toru Seki; Kaori Ohmori-Matsuda; Naoki Nakaya; Satoru Ebihara; Yun Wang; Ichiro Tsuji; Ryoichi Nagatomi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Age-specific differences between conventional and ambulatory daytime blood pressure values.

Authors:  David Conen; Stefanie Aeschbacher; Lutgarde Thijs; Yan Li; José Boggia; Kei Asayama; Tine W Hansen; Masahiro Kikuya; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Jørgen Jeppesen; Yu-Mei Gu; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Eamon Dolan; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Valérie Tikhonoff; Tobias Schoen; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Yuri Nikitin; Lars Lind; Edgardo Sandoya; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Luis Mena; Gladys E Maestre; Jan Filipovský; Yutaka Imai; Eoin O'Brien; Ji-Guang Wang; Lorenz Risch; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Epidemiology of masked and white-coat hypertension: the family-based SKIPOGH study.

Authors:  Heba Alwan; Menno Pruijm; Belen Ponte; Daniel Ackermann; Idris Guessous; Georg Ehret; Jan A Staessen; Kei Asayama; Philippe Vuistiner; Sandrine Estoppey Younes; Fred Paccaud; Grégoire Wuerzner; Antoinette Pechere-Bertschi; Markus Mohaupt; Bruno Vogt; Pierre-Yves Martin; Michel Burnier; Murielle Bochud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rationale for Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Thresholds in the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Kenneth Jamerson; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Age-Related Trends in Home Blood Pressure, Home Pulse Rate, and Day-to-Day Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate Variability Based on Longitudinal Cohort Data: The Ohasama Study.

Authors:  Michihiro Satoh; Hirohito Metoki; Kei Asayama; Takahisa Murakami; Ryusuke Inoue; Megumi Tsubota-Utsugi; Ayako Matsuda; Takuo Hirose; Azusa Hara; Taku Obara; Masahiro Kikuya; Kyoko Nomura; Atsushi Hozawa; Yutaka Imai; Takayoshi Ohkubo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Age-related changes in the risk of high blood pressure.

Authors:  Weibin Cheng; Yumeng Du; Qingpeng Zhang; Xin Wang; Chaocheng He; Jingjun He; Fengshi Jing; Hao Ren; Mengzhuo Guo; Junzhang Tian; Zhongzhi Xu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15

4.  Home sphygmomanometers can help in the control of blood pressure: a nationwide field survey.

Authors:  Tekin Akpolat; Mustafa Arici; Sule Sengul; Ulver Derici; Sukru Ulusoy; Sehsuvar Erturk; Yunus Erdem
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of a New Cuffless Magnetoplethysmography Blood Pressure Monitor in Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Sua Kim; Jung Dong Lee; Jeong Bae Park; Seungjin Jang; Jungchae Kim; Sang-Suk Lee
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.