Literature DB >> 27052939

Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.

D Girerd1, S Parratte2, A Lunebourg1, F Boureau3, M Ollivier1, G Pasquier3, S Putman3, H Migaud3, J N Argenson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful management of large bone defects is of crucial importance when performing revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Trabecular tantalum cones may improve prosthesis fixation via their potential for reconstructing a stable metaphyseal support. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes and the complications of tantalum cones in revision TKA. HYPOTHESIS: Trabecular tantalum cones provide stable and durable metaphyseal reconstruction when used during revision TKA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Trabecular Metal™ cones (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) were used for 52 revision TKAs in 51 patients (mean age, 68±9 years) managed in two centres between 2008 and 2013. A rotating hinge prosthesis was chosen for 38 (73%) knees and a condylar constrained knee prosthesis for 14 (27%) knees, with 37 tibial and 34 femoral cones. The two most common reasons for revision surgery were aseptic loosening (n=22, 42%) and infection (n=19, 37%). The bone loss was severe in most cases. At each centre, after a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 24-52 months), two independent observers assessed the Knee Society Score (KSS), range of motion, mechanical axis, and osteo-integration for each patient.
RESULTS: Mean KSS increased from 46 preoperatively to 77 (P=0.001) at last follow-up and the mean KSS function from 39 to 57 (P=0.007). Mean range of motion improved from 93° (45°-120°) to 110° (65°-130°) (P=0.001). Mean postoperative mechanical axis was 180° (172°-190°). Radiographic evaluation showed evidence of osteo-integration for all cones. Four revisions were performed for recurrence of infection but none for mechanical failure. DISCUSSION: The findings of our study confirm the biomechanical and biological reliability of Trabecular Metal™ cones used to fill metaphyseal bone defects during revision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective therapeutic study.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone defect; Knee; Revision; Tantalum; Total knee arthroplasty; Trabecular metal cones

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27052939     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  11 in total

1.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.

Authors:  Catherine J Fedorka; Antonia F Chen; Michael R Pagnotto; Lawrence S Crossett; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Giovanni Intermesoli; Francesco Pirato; Ilaria Piergentili; Roland Becker; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian Oakley; Jore H Willems; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Petra Heesterbeek; Joshua Rozell; Scott Marwin; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Survival, functional outcome and satisfaction of first revision total knee arthroplasty at a mean eleven-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Hecker; Hans-Jürg A Pütz; Sebastian Wangler; Frank M Klenke
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  Midterm Outcomes of Tantalum Metal Cones for Severe Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ashok Rajgopal; Sumit Kumar; Kalpana Aggarwal
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 9.  Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero; Carlos A Encinas-Ullán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

10.  Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alan de Paula Mozella; Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.