Literature DB >> 27052658

A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with triple-negative androgen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (UCBG 12-1).

H Bonnefoi1, T Grellety2, O Tredan3, M Saghatchian4, F Dalenc5, A Mailliez6, T L'Haridon7, P Cottu8, S Abadie-Lacourtoisie9, B You10, M Mousseau11, J Dauba12, F Del Piano13, I Desmoulins14, F Coussy15, N Madranges2, J Grenier16, F C Bidard8, C Proudhon8, G MacGrogan17, C Orsini18, M Pulido19, A Gonçalves20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several expression array studies identified molecular apocrine breast cancer (BC) as a subtype that expresses androgen receptor (AR) but not estrogen receptor α. We carried out a multicentre single-arm phase II trial in women with AR-positive, estrogen, progesterone receptor and HER2-negative (triple-negative) metastatic or inoperable locally advanced BC to assess the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a metastatic or locally advanced, centrally reviewed, triple-negative and AR-positive (≥10% by immunohistochemistry, IHC) BC were eligible. Any number of previous lines of chemotherapy was allowed. AA (1000 mg) was administered once a day with prednisone (5 mg) twice a day until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months defined as the proportion of patients presenting a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients from 27 centres consented for IHC central review. Of the 138 patients with sufficient tissue available, 53 (37.6%) were AR-positive and triple-negative, and 34 of them were included from July 2013 to December 2014. Thirty patients were eligible and evaluable for the primary end point. The 6-month CBR was 20.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.7%-38.6%], including 1 CR and 5 SD ≥6 months, 5 of them still being under treatment at the time of analysis (6.4+, 9.2+, 14.5+, 17.6+, 23.4+ months). The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI 0.8%-22.1%). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.7%-5.4%). Fatigue, hypertension, hypokalaemia and nausea were the most common drug-related adverse events; the majority of them being grade 1 or 2.
CONCLUSIONS: AA plus prednisone treatment is beneficial for some patients with molecular apocrine tumours and five patients are still on treatment. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01842321.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abiraterone acetate; androgen receptor; breast cancer; molecular apocrine; triple-negative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27052658     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  89 in total

1.  A population pharmacokinetic analysis of the oral CYP17 lyase and androgen receptor inhibitor seviteronel in patients with advanced/metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer or breast cancer.

Authors:  Cody J Peer; Keith T Schmidt; Jessica D Kindrick; Joel R Eisner; Victoria V Brown; Edwina Baskin-Bey; Ravi Madan; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†.

Authors:  F Cardoso; E Senkus; A Costa; E Papadopoulos; M Aapro; F André; N Harbeck; B Aguilar Lopez; C H Barrios; J Bergh; L Biganzoli; C B Boers-Doets; M J Cardoso; L A Carey; J Cortés; G Curigliano; V Diéras; N S El Saghir; A Eniu; L Fallowfield; P A Francis; K Gelmon; S R D Johnston; B Kaufman; S Koppikar; I E Krop; M Mayer; G Nakigudde; B V Offersen; S Ohno; O Pagani; S Paluch-Shimon; F Penault-Llorca; A Prat; H S Rugo; G W Sledge; D Spence; C Thomssen; D A Vorobiof; B Xu; L Norton; E P Winer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Insights into Molecular Classifications of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Selection for Treatment.

Authors:  Ana C Garrido-Castro; Nancy U Lin; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 4.  Early stage triple negative breast cancer: Management and future directions.

Authors:  Lubna N Chaudhary
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Impact of estrogens in males and androgens in females.

Authors:  Stephen R Hammes; Ellis R Levin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Targeting the androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Ayca Gucalp; Tiffany A Traina
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Systematic Review of the Literature on Molecular and Clinical Features with a Focus on Treatment with Innovative Drugs.

Authors:  Anna Diana; Elisena Franzese; Sara Centonze; Francesca Carlino; Carminia Maria Della Corte; Jole Ventriglia; Angelica Petrillo; Ferdinando De Vita; Roberto Alfano; Fortunato Ciardiello; Michele Orditura
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Enzalutamide for the Treatment of Androgen Receptor-Expressing Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tiffany A Traina; Kathy Miller; Denise A Yardley; Janice Eakle; Lee S Schwartzberg; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; William Gradishar; Peter Schmid; Eric Winer; Catherine Kelly; Rita Nanda; Ayca Gucalp; Ahmad Awada; Laura Garcia-Estevez; Maureen E Trudeau; Joyce Steinberg; Hirdesh Uppal; Iulia Cristina Tudor; Amy Peterson; Javier Cortes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Breast Cancer in Elderly Patients: The Promise of Novel Agents.

Authors:  Catherine Terret; Chiara Russo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Harnessing a Different Dependency: How to Identify and Target Androgen Receptor-Positive Versus Quadruple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jessica L Christenson; Jane B Trepel; Haythem Y Ali; Sunmin Lee; Joel R Eisner; Edwina S Baskin-Bey; Anthony D Elias; Jennifer K Richer
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.