Literature DB >> 27052535

Nondigestible Fructans Alter Gastrointestinal Barrier Function, Gene Expression, Histomorphology, and the Microbiota Profiles of Diet-Induced Obese C57BL/6J Mice.

Tzu-Wen Liu1, Kimberly D Cephas1, Hannah D Holscher2, Katherine R Kerr1, Heather F Mangian1, Kelly A Tappenden3, Kelly S Swanson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with compromised intestinal barrier function and shifts in gastrointestinal microbiota that may contribute to inflammation. Fiber provides benefits, but impacts of fiber type are not understood.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the impact of cellulose compared with fructans on the fecal microbiota and gastrointestinal physiology in obese mice.
METHODS: Eighteen-wk-old male diet-induced obese C57BL/6J mice (n = 6/group; 40.5 g) were fed high-fat diets (45% kcal fat) containing 5% cellulose (control), 10% cellulose, 10% short-chain fructooligosaccharides (scFOS), or 10% inulin for 4 wk. Cecal and colon tissues were collected to assess barrier function, histomorphology, and gene expression. Fecal DNA extracts were subjected to 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon-based Illumina MiSeq sequencing to assess microbiota.
RESULTS: Body weight gain was greater (P < 0.05) in scFOS-fed than in 10% cellulose-fed mice. Both groups of fructan-fed mice had greater (P < 0.05) cecal crypt depth (scFOS: 141 μm; inulin: 145 μm) than both groups of cellulose-fed mice (5% and 10%: 109 μm). Inulin-fed mice had greater (P < 0.05) cecal transmural resistance (101 Ω × cm(2)) than 5% cellulose-fed controls (45 Ω × cm(2)). Inulin-fed mice had lower (P < 0.05) colonic mRNA abundance of Ocln (0.41) and Mct1 (0.35) than those fed 10% cellulose (Ocln: 1.28; Mct1: 0.90). Fructan and cellulose groups had different UniFrac distances of fecal microbiota (P < 0.05) and α diversity, which demonstrated lower (P < 0.01) species richness in fructan-fed mice. Mice fed scFOS had greater (P < 0.05) Actinobacteria (15.9%) and Verrucomicrobia (Akkermansia) (17.0%) than 5% controls (Actinobacteria: 0.07%; Akkermansia: 0.08%). Relative abundance of Akkermansia was positively correlated (r = 0.56, P < 0.01) with cecal crypt depth.
CONCLUSIONS: Fructans markedly shifted gut microbiota and improved intestinal physiology in obese mice, but the mechanisms by which they affect gut integrity and inflammation in the obese are still unknown.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fiber; gut microbiota; intestinal permeability; obesity; tight junctions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27052535     DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.227504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  26 in total

1.  Fiber-Mediated Nourishment of Gut Microbiota Protects against Diet-Induced Obesity by Restoring IL-22-Mediated Colonic Health.

Authors:  Jun Zou; Benoit Chassaing; Vishal Singh; Michael Pellizzon; Matthew Ricci; Michael D Fythe; Matam Vijay Kumar; Andrew T Gewirtz
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 21.023

2.  Broccoli consumption affects the human gastrointestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kaczmarek; Xiaoji Liu; Craig S Charron; Janet A Novotny; Elizabeth H Jeffery; Harold E Seifried; Sharon A Ross; Michael J Miller; Kelly S Swanson; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Effects of extraction methods on physicochemical properties and hypoglycemic activities of polysaccharides from coarse green tea.

Authors:  Jiangxiong Zhu; Ziyan Chen; Hui Zhou; Chuang Yu; Zi Han; Shengrong Shao; Xincheng Hu; Xinlin Wei; Yuanfeng Wang
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 4.  Therapeutic Benefits and Dietary Restrictions of Fiber Intake: A State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Corina-Bianca Ioniță-Mîndrican; Khaled Ziani; Magdalena Mititelu; Eliza Oprea; Sorinel Marius Neacșu; Elena Moroșan; Denisa-Elena Dumitrescu; Adrian Cosmin Roșca; Doina Drăgănescu; Carolina Negrei
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 5.  The Role of Nutritional Factors in the Modulation of the Composition of the Gut Microbiota in People with Autoimmune Diabetes.

Authors:  Anna Winiarska-Mieczan; Ewa Tomaszewska; Janine Donaldson; Karolina Jachimowicz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 6.  Effect of inulin-type fructans on blood lipid profile and glucose level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  F Liu; M Prabhakar; J Ju; H Long; H-W Zhou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Gut Microbiota Modifications and Weight Regain in Morbidly Obese Women After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Silvia Leite Faria; Andrey Santos; Daniéla Oliveira Magro; Everton Cazzo; Heloisa Balan Assalin; Dioze Guadagnini; Flavio Teixeira Vieira; Eliane Said Dutra; Mario José Abdalla Saad; Marina K Ito
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Microbiome-Mediated Effects of the Mediterranean Diet on Inflammation.

Authors:  Melisa A Bailey; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Fecal Microbiota Perspective for Evaluation of Prebiotic Potential of Bamboo Hemicellulose Hydrolysate in Mice: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Nao Ikeyama; Mitsuo Sakamoto; Moriya Ohkuma; Shigeru Hiramoto; Jianpeng Wang; Shigenobu Tone; Kiwamu Shiiba
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-21

Review 10.  Next-Generation Beneficial Microbes: The Case of Akkermansia muciniphila.

Authors:  Patrice D Cani; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.