Literature DB >> 27052312

An outline of necrosome triggers.

Tom Vanden Berghe1,2, Behrouz Hassannia3,4,5, Peter Vandenabeele6,7.   

Abstract

Necroptosis was initially identified as a backup cell death program when apoptosis is blocked. However, it is now recognized as a cellular defense mechanism against infections and is presumed to be a detrimental factor in several pathologies driven by cell death. Necroptosis is a prototypic form of regulated necrosis that depends on activation of the necrosome, which is a protein complex in which receptor interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 3 is activated. The RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) is the core domain that regulates activation of the necrosome. To date, three RHIM-containing proteins have been reported to activate the kinase activity of RIPK3 within the necrosome: RIPK1, Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF), and DNA-dependent activator of interferon regulatory factors (DAI). Here, we review and discuss commonalities and differences of the increasing number of activators of the necrosome. Since the discovery that activation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) by RIPK3 kinase activity is crucial in necroptosis, interest has increased in monitoring and therapeutically targeting their activation. The availability of new phospho-specific antibodies, pharmacologic inhibitors, and transgenic models will allow us to further document the role of necroptosis in degenerative, inflammatory and infectious diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MLKL; Necroptosis; Pathogens; RHIM; RIPK1; RIPK3

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27052312      PMCID: PMC4887535          DOI: 10.1007/s00018-016-2189-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


Introduction

Rudolf Virchow (1821–1902, Prussia), founder of the cell theory (Omnis cellula e cellula) and cellular pathology, referred to tissue injury as “parenchymatous inflammation” and introduced the idea that tissue injury is caused by pathological changes within the cells. In 1858, he introduced the notion of cell death as a potential basis for pathology, with ‘necrobiosis’ being a physiological process of spontaneous wearing out of living parts from the body and ‘necrosis’ an accidental process. The term ‘necrosis’ comes from the Greek word ‘nekros,’ which means ‘dead body.’ Virchow’s necrobiosis–necrosis dichotomy resembles to some extent the current apoptosis–necrosis classification [1]. Together with cellular and molecular insights into inflammation came a shift in our understanding of the molecular interplay between cell death and inflammation at the site of tissue injury. This emerging field of research is crucial for understanding organismal homeostasis and how its processes contribute to a growing list of inflammatory and degenerative pathologies. Although cell death during inflammation was initially considered a manifestation of tissue damage, it was later recognized as a mechanism for eliminating pathogens and regulating inflammation by exposing or releasing molecular patterns that attract and alter the functions of other cells [2]. More recently, it became clear that phagocytosis of apoptotic cells can also initiate anti-inflammatory and tissue-regenerative responses [3, 4]. The current notion that not only apoptotic but also necrotic cell death is molecularly controlled by defined signaling mechanisms has increased the interest in studying regulated necrosis in the context of development, homeostasis and inflammation. Although RIPK3 knockout mice and MLKL knockout mice do not show an overt phenotypic abnormality under non-challenged conditions [5-8], it became clear that RIPK3-mediated necroptosis is a highly controlled cell death program that is executed when negative regulators such as caspase-8, IAPs or even RIPK1 are absent [9-17]. This suggests that the default mode during development and homeostasis is strong inhibition of the necroptosis pathway. Regulated necrosis, like passive necrosis due to physico-chemical insult, is caused by loss of plasma membrane integrity leading to cellular rounding followed by swelling (oncosis). When the immune system recognizes cellular content exposed or released due to loss of membrane integrity, it initiates an inflammatory response. Regulated necrosis can be classified into several cell death modalities, such as necroptosis, parthanatos, ferroptosis, cyclophilin D-dependent necrosis, (n)etosis and pyroptosis [18]. Each type of regulated necrosis has particular biochemical features, yet it is not clear whether the common morphological features of these forms of cell death share or converge on common pathways. Other forms of cellular death are being identified, such as entosis [19], autosis [20, 21] and autoschizis [22]. Necroptosis, the best-characterized form of regulated necrosis, is mediated by the concerted action of receptor interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 3 and mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). In this review, we provide a snapshot of the activation of RIPK3 within the necrosome, typically by the three RHIM-containing proteins RIPK1, Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF) and DNA-dependent activator of interferon regulatory factors (DAI). We briefly discuss the pluripotent roles of RIPK1 and RIPK3 in gene regulation and cell death induction.

RIPK1-dependent necroptosis

The mechanism of RIPK1-dependent necroptosis has been discovered mostly from studying tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling under conditions favoring cell death. This is because the major function of TNFR1, like that of DR3 (TRAMP/APO-3), is to induce pro-survival and pro-inflammatory genes, in contrast to some other death receptor family members such as CD95 (FAS/APO-1), TRAILR1 (DR4) and TRAILR2 (APO-2/TRICK/DR5/KILLER). The following model is currently proposed for TNFR1 signaling: sensing of trimeric TNF by TNFR1 induces the assembly of a primary receptor-bound complex that triggers activation of signaling pathways leading to gene induction [23-25]. Subsequently, assembly of a secondary TNFR1-unbound cytosolic complex induces cell death. For FAS and TRAILR1/2, the opposite situation is observed [26]. This sequential signaling provides a backup response by the secondary cytosolic complex in case the default pathway activated by the receptor-associated complex fails to resolve the infectious or inflammatory condition. Typically, pathogens and (epi)genetic factors can interfere with gene activation or cell death induction. Thus, this sequential signaling probably evolved as a host defense against pathogens or conditions that might perturb either pathway. In this review, we will briefly describe cell death signaling downstream of TNFR1, with a focus on necrosome activation. A cytosolic cell death-inducing complex is formed upon stimulation of TNFR1 only in conditions that sensitize to cell death, for example when cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (c-IAPs) are absent (IAP-antagonist treatment), TAK1 or translation is inhibited, or RIPK1 is deubiquitinated [18]. This cytosolic complex (often referred to as complex II), which is composed of at least RIPK1, the death-fold-containing proteins Fas-associated protein via death domain (FADD), CASP8, and cFLIP (Fig. 1), induces either apoptosis or necroptosis. The formation and/or activity of complex II is tightly regulated by inhibitor κB kinases (IKKs) through mechanisms that are either dependent or independent of NF-κB [27].
Fig. 1

Canonical versus noncanonical necrosome activation by three distinct RHIM-containing host adaptors. RIPK1 is a key pro-necrotic kinase that responds to several DRs, TCR, IFN-γR and genotoxic stress by forming a RIPK1–RIPK3 complex through RHIM-dependent interactions (referred to as canonical necrosome). Necrostatin-1s (Nec-1s) blocks the cytotoxicity induced by the kinase activity of RIPK1. In TNFR1 signaling, cell death is efficiently induced only upon formation of a cytosolic cell death–inducing complex (complex II) when, for example, cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (c-IAPs) are absent or depleted (IAP-antagonist treatment), TAK1 or translation is inhibited, or RIPK1 is deubiquitinated. In addition, caspases need to be inactivated or depleted, for example by pharmacological or viral inhibitors, to allow necroptosis to occur. TRIF and DAI are two other RHIM-containing adaptors that can activate RIPK3 via RHIM-dependent interactions in response to TLR3/-4 and MCMV, respectively (referred to as noncanonical necrosomes). RIPK3, upon activation by RIPK1, TRIF or DAI, phosphorylates itself and subsequently MLKL to stimulate oligomerization and translocation of MLKL to intracellular and plasma membranes. It is assumed that MLKL induces membrane rupture by binding directly to membrane phospholipids or indirectly with the help of calcium or sodium ion channels. Necrosulfonamide targets human MLKL and blocks necroptosis induction. DAI DNA-dependent activator of interferon regulatory factors, DR death receptor, FADD Fas-associated protein via a death domain, IFN interferon, MCMV murine cytomegalovirus, MLKL mixed lineage kinase domain-like, NSA necrosulfonamide, LPS lipopolysaccharide, RIPK receptor-interacting protein kinase, TCR T cell receptor, TLR Toll like receptor, TNF tumor necrosis factor, TRIF Toll-interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon-β

Canonical versus noncanonical necrosome activation by three distinct RHIM-containing host adaptors. RIPK1 is a key pro-necrotic kinase that responds to several DRs, TCR, IFN-γR and genotoxic stress by forming a RIPK1RIPK3 complex through RHIM-dependent interactions (referred to as canonical necrosome). Necrostatin-1s (Nec-1s) blocks the cytotoxicity induced by the kinase activity of RIPK1. In TNFR1 signaling, cell death is efficiently induced only upon formation of a cytosolic cell death–inducing complex (complex II) when, for example, cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (c-IAPs) are absent or depleted (IAP-antagonist treatment), TAK1 or translation is inhibited, or RIPK1 is deubiquitinated. In addition, caspases need to be inactivated or depleted, for example by pharmacological or viral inhibitors, to allow necroptosis to occur. TRIF and DAI are two other RHIM-containing adaptors that can activate RIPK3 via RHIM-dependent interactions in response to TLR3/-4 and MCMV, respectively (referred to as noncanonical necrosomes). RIPK3, upon activation by RIPK1, TRIF or DAI, phosphorylates itself and subsequently MLKL to stimulate oligomerization and translocation of MLKL to intracellular and plasma membranes. It is assumed that MLKL induces membrane rupture by binding directly to membrane phospholipids or indirectly with the help of calcium or sodium ion channels. Necrosulfonamide targets human MLKL and blocks necroptosis induction. DAI DNA-dependent activator of interferon regulatory factors, DR death receptor, FADD Fas-associated protein via a death domain, IFN interferon, MCMV murine cytomegalovirus, MLKL mixed lineage kinase domain-like, NSA necrosulfonamide, LPS lipopolysaccharide, RIPK receptor-interacting protein kinase, TCR T cell receptor, TLR Toll like receptor, TNF tumor necrosis factor, TRIF Toll-interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon-β Necroptosis is typically initiated when caspases are insufficiently activated or their activity is blocked, for example by pharmacological or viral inhibitors. This concept was first proposed based on studies of DR signaling in fibrosarcoma cells [28, 29], and later confirmed in vivo by the rescue of the embryonal lethality of CASP8 or FADD deficiency by RIPK3 depletion [9, 14, 16]. CASP8 cleaves and inactivates RIPK1 [30], RIPK3 [31] and cylindromatosis (CYLD) [32]. This could at least partially explain the protective role of CASP8 against necroptosis [33, 34]. It is thought that CYLD is crucial for translocation of RIPK1 from receptor-bound complex I to the cytosolic death-inducing complex II by removing ubiquitin chains from RIPK1 [35, 36]. However, recently it became clear that complex II is also ubiquitylated, although the E3 ligases have not been identified yet [37-41]. While complex II is formed through interactions that depend on the death effector domain (DED) and the death domain (DD), RIPK1 and RIPK3 interact through RIP homotypic interaction motifs (RHIM) [6, 42–45]. It is assumed that this RHIM-dependent binding of RIPK1 and RIPK3 involves a conformational change that releases the RHIM domain [46]; the conformational change depends on posttranslational modifications, particularly the phosphorylation and ubiquitination status. A series of auto- and cross-phosphorylations between RIPK1 and RIPK3 result in the formation and activation of the canonical necrosome [43, 47], which appears as an amyloid-like structure of RHIM-dependent oligomerized RIPK3 [48]. The phosphorylation of human RIPK3 at Ser227 and mouse RIPK3 at Ser232 is crucial for recruitment of mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) [49-52]. Subsequent phosphorylation of MLKL at Thr357/Ser358 by human RIPK3 [50] or at Ser345/Ser347/Ser352/Thr349 by mouse RIPK3 [52] stimulates its oligomerization and translocation to intracellular and plasma membranes. The precise mechanism by which MLKL induces membrane rupture is controversial. Some reports implicate the influx of calcium or sodium through ion channels [53, 54] whereas others show direct binding to membrane phosphatidylinositol phosphates and loss of membrane integrity [55, 56]. In addition to TNF receptor signaling, other receptors induce necroptosis through RIPK1-dependent necrosome activation (Fig. 1; Table 1). These receptors include CD95L (FasL/APO-1L) [57], TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand or Apo2L) [57], TWEAK (TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis) [58], and T cell receptor (TCR) [59]. Also, genotoxic stress [60, 61] and some anti-cancer drugs such as shikonin [62, 63] and obatoclax [64] have been shown to induce RIPK1-dependent necroptosis (Table 2). However, the assumption that many chemotherapeutics induce RIPK1/3-mediated necroptosis was recently challenged [65].
Table 1

Overview of experimental findings of ligand-induced necroptosis involving MLKL

TriggerMajor findingReferences
TNFDiscovery of MLKL downstream of RIPK3[50, 125]
Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of RIP3-dependent protein phosphorylation[126, 127]
Trimerized MLKL acts at plasma membrane to allow Ca2+ influxvia TRPM7[53]
MLKL unleashes four-helical bundle to induce membrane ruptureDiscovery of mouse MLKL targeting compound 1[128]
Depletion of RIPK3 or MLKL favors RIPK1 kinase-dependent apoptosis[92]
RIPK1 can function as an inhibitor rather than an initiator of RIPK3-dependent necroptosis[129]
Hsp90 and Cdc37 are required for RIPK3 activation[130]
Necroptosis is preceded by nuclear translocation of RIPK1, RIPK 3 and MLKL[131]
Radical scavengers attenuate necrosome assembly[132]
Ponatinib and pazopanib inhibit necroptosis by targeting RIPK1[133]
Structure-guided design of potent and selective ponatinib-based hybrid inhibitors for RIPK1[134]
Clnk promotes necroptosis downstream of RIPK3 and upstream of MLKL[135]
Intracellular NAD+ promotes TNF-induced necroptosis in a sirtuin-dependent manner[136]
TRAF2 suppresses necrosome assembly[117]
MLKL and cofilin-1 translocation to mitochondria, Bax/Bak oligomerization, CypD and downregulation of Mcl-1 contribute to necroptosis[137]
Ser345 is crucial for MLKL translocation and subsequent necroptosis[138]
LPSRIPK3 promotes cell death and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the absence of MLKL[139]
MLKL and PGAM5 upstream of NLRP3-mediated IL-1b maturation in caspase-8-deficient dendritic cells[94]
TLR1/2,3,4,7/8 ligandsCaspase blockade induces RIP3-mediated programmed necrosis in Toll-like receptor-activated microglia[140]
polyIC/ATPCaspase-8 scaffolding function and MLKL regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation downstream of TLR3[141]
α-GalCerRegulation of NKT cell-mediated immune responses to tumors and liver inflammation by mitochondrial PGAM5-Drp1 signaling[142]
RIPK3 dimerizationNecroptosis is dependent on MLKL but not on DRP1[143]
MLKL dimerizationMLKL compromises membrane integrity by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates[55]
RIPK1 and -3 oligomerizationRIPK3 homo-oligomerization results in amyloid scaffold, RIPK3 autophosphorylation and MLKL docking[144146]
CD40LCD40L induces necrosome-dependent necroptosis in low-grade serous carcinomas[147]
Table 2

Overview of experimental findings of chemical-, toxin- or virus-induced necroptosis involving MLKL

TriggerMajor findingReferences
BV6/MS275/zVADfmkCombination of SMAC-mimetics, HDAC inhibitors and caspase inhibition induces RIPK1- and MLKL-dependent necroptosis[148]
NPe6-PDTPhotodynamic therapy using a high dose of the photosensitizer talaporfin sodium induces RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL-dependent necroptosis[149]
CCCPImpaired oxidative phosphorylation regulates MLKL-dependent necroptosis[150]
Cigarette smoke extractNex-5 and Nec-1 protect against cell death induced by cigarette smoke extract[151]
ShikoninRIPK1- and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis[152]
ObatoclaxNecrosome formation at autophagosomal membranes[64]
Staurosporine/zVADfmkNSA blocks S/Z-induced necroptosis[153]
Cytarabine/SMAC-mimeticNec-1 or NSA block TNF-mediated necroptosis[154]
Thapsigargin tunicamycinRIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL-mediated necroptosis in mouse fibrosarcoma cells[155]
EdelfosineRIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL-mediated necroptosis in human glioblastoma cells[156]
CisplatinRIPK1-dependent necroptosis in squamous cell carcinoma[157]
Doxorubicine etoposideRIPK3-/MLKL-dependent cell death[158]
HomoharringtonineSensitizes TRAIL-induced necroptosis[159]
Acetylcholinesterase-R peptideRIPK1/MLKL-mediated necroptosis in human granulosa cells[160]
PMANeutrophil extracellular trap formation can involve RIPK1-RIPK3-MLKL signaling[161]
NET formation can occur independently of RIPK3 and MLKL signaling[162]
CNOT3-deficiencyCNOT3 suppression promotes necroptosis by stabilizing mRNAs for cell death-inducing proteins[163]
NeoalbaconolNeoalbaconol induces cell death through necroptosis by regulating RIPK-dependent autocrine TNF[164]
Chal-24A JNK-mediated autophagy pathway that triggers c-IAP degradation and necroptosis for anticancer chemotherapy[165]
HypoxiaGlycolytic pyruvate scavenging of mitochondrial superoxide protects against necroptosis[166]
HonokiolHonokiol induces RIPK3- and CypD-mediated necroptosis[167]
RNA virusesRIPK1/RIPK3/DRP1-mediated NLRP3 activation[168]
CMVDAI complexes with RIPK3 to mediate virus-induced programmed necrosis[74]
Human CMV blocks TNF-induced necroptosis downstream of RIPK3 and MLKL[169]
HSV-1Mouse ICP6 triggers RIPK3/MLKL-dependent necroptosis[170]
Staphylococcus aureus toxinSA toxin triggers RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL-dependent necroptosis[107]
HSV-1 and -2Human, but not mouse, HSV-1 and -2 prevent necrosome-dependent necroptosis[171173]
HIVHIV-1 protease cleaves RIPK1 and RIPK2[174]
Overview of experimental findings of ligand-induced necroptosis involving MLKL Overview of experimental findings of chemical-, toxin- or virus-induced necroptosis involving MLKL

TRIF-dependent necroptosis

RIPK1 is the central RHIM-containing protein involved in the activation of RIPK3 during TNF-induced necroptosis, which leads to the formation of the so-called canonical necrosome complex. However, in response to some Toll-like receptors (TLRs), the RHIM-containing protein TRIF somehow activates RIPK3 independently of RIPK1 [44, 45], leading to assembly of the noncanonical necrosome complex [46]. Each member of the TLR family senses particular pathogen-associated molecular patterns [66]. When activated, TLRs recruit adaptors containing the Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain and initiate NF-κB and IRF3/7 signaling that trigger the expression of cytokines, chemokines and interferons. All TLRs, with the exception of TLR3 and TLR4, mediate the signal through the adaptor myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88 (MYD88). On the other hand, TLR3 and TLR4, after binding of the ligand (dsRNA and LPS, respectively), recruit the RHIM domain containing adaptor TRIF [67]. Both TLR3 and TLR4 directly induce apoptosis or, if caspase activity is compromised, necroptosis [42, 68, 69]. Several other TLRs, such as TLR2, TLR5 and TLR9, also induce cell death but through an endocrine or paracrine TNF-dependent mechanism [70]. TLR3/4-induced necroptosis is critically dependent on RHIM-mediated recruitment of TRIF to activate RIPK3 (Fig. 1) [69, 70]. Like RIPK1 and RIPK3, TRIF is a cleavage substrate of CASP8 that inhibits its ability to stimulate NF-κB-dependent cytokine expression [71]. Notably, RIPK1 seems to have a cell type specific function in TLR3/4-induced cell death. While fibroblast and endothelial cells undergo TLR3-dependent necroptosis independently of RIPK1, macrophages require RIPK1 to commit to TLR3/4-mediated necroptosis [70].

DAI-dependent necroptosis

In addition to RIPK1 and TRIF, a third RHIM-containing protein, DAI, has been reported to activate the necrosome (Fig. 1). The DAI pathway is typically activated in response to DNA viruses and leads to inhibition of viral replication [72]. Like TLR signaling, the intracellular DNA sensor activates the NF-κB and IRF3 pathways to promote the synthesis of cytokines and interferons, which is dependent on RHIM-mediated recruitment of RIPK1 [73]. In addition, in response to DNA viruses, DAI induces necroptosis through RHIM-mediated activation of RIPK3 in the noncanonical necrosome [74]. As a virus-encoded countermeasure, the murine cytomegalovirus (CMV) M45-encoded viral inhibitor of RIP activation (vIRA) acts as a RHIM competitor and blocks necroptosis, which explains the virus’s successful replication in the host. The potency of this cell autonomous host defense pathway is demonstrated by the remarkable attenuation of M45-deficient viruses in mice. Importantly, as in RIPK3-deficient mice, mCMV lacking M45 has the same pathogenesis in DAI-deficient mice, consistent with the notion of the existence of a DAIRIPK3 complex as the natural target of M45 [74]. M45 encodes a ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) lacking enzymatic activity. Interestingly, many RNRs from herpesviruses also encode a RHIM [75]. This suggests that viral inhibitors that target the RIPKs via the RHIM represent a common viral evasion strategy.

The Janus faces of RIPK1

The ‘two faces’ of RIPK1 refers to its dual role. It has a cell death inhibitory role that is shown by the massive cell death observed in RIPK1-deficient models, whereas its necroptosis-inducing capacity is executed by its kinase activity. In the absence of RIPK1, massive apoptosis is observed in cells [34, 76], in postnatal death knockout mice [77], and in intestinal specific knockout mice [12, 13]. It was initially thought that this was due to the role of RIPK1 in mediating NF-κB activation, which results in the expression of survival genes such as Flip [77]. In this respect, cFLIPL-CASP8 heterodimers have partial enzymatic activity, leading to incomplete cleavage of CASP8 [78, 79], and this consequently prevents apoptosis. Nevertheless, it is thought that CASP8 has some local activity within complex II resulting in cleavage of RIPKs and CYLD [80], which may contribute to the anti-necroptotic role of CASP8. However, mounting evidence questions the necessity or uniqueness of the role of NF-κB activation in controlling cell death. For example, NF-κB is still activated in response to TNF stimulation in the absence of RIPK1 in cultured MEF cells [81] and in intestinal organoids [13]. TAB2-deficient mice have a functional NF-κB pathway, yet they die from massive liver apoptosis like mice deficient in p65, IKKβ, TAK1 or NEMO [82]. Moreover, the rescue of mutant RIPK1 kinase-dead knockin mice from TNF-induced shock [10, 11, 83, 84] and from the lethal TNF-induced inflammation in Sharpin mutant mice [83] also calls into question the dominance of NF-κB activation (that occurs in a RIPK1 kinase independent way). This is underscored by the recent finding that IKKα and IKKβ control RIPK1-mediated cell death independently of NF-κB activation [27]. The dual role of RIPK1 in controlling cell death is also illustrated by the perinatal death of RIPK1 knockout mice due to the aberrant activation of caspase-8 and RIPK3; mice lacking all three enzymes survived to adulthood [10, 14, 85]. Indeed, in addition to its anti-apoptotic role, RIPK1 also prevents RIPK3-driven necroptosis promoted by IFN and the TLR-adapter TRIF [14]. Since RIPK1 is reported to be essential for RIPK3 activation and subsequent necroptosis induction by TNF, the identification of settings in which RIPK1 actively suppresses RIPK3 was surprising. Moreover, conditional depletion of RIPK1 leads to apoptosis in the intestine and necroptosis in the skin [12, 13]. This dynamic interplay and interdependence of these complex II components confers a crucial host-defense function to limit pathogen spread, especially when any one of these processes is disrupted [72, 86]. This may explain why this complex interrelationship exists and why ablation of specific elements (including RIPK1, FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP) push the system to lethality [87]. In line with this reasoning, the tissues most affected by disruption of these gene products (intestine, lung, skin, endothelium, hematopoietic cells) represent crucial barriers to infection that are constantly engaged by pathogens [88]. Depending on the tissue, cell type and developmental stage, RIPK1 can certainly either activate or inhibit cell death.

The pleiotropic role of RIPK3

Whereas RIPK3 knockout mice are viable and fertile [5, 89], RIPK3 D161N kinase dead knockin mice die on embryonic day E10.5 due to massive levels of apoptosis in the embryo and yolk sac vasculature [11]. But this was not observed in RIPK3 D51A kinase dead knockin mice Mandal et al. [89]. The embryonic death of RIPK3 D161N kinase dead knockin mice was rescued by ablation of RIPK1 or caspase-8, indicating that RIPK3 can engage both RIPK1 and caspase-8 [11]. It remains unclear structurally why the D161N kinase-dead mutation in RIPK3 is proapoptotic, though it is likely that the kinase domain functionally “masks” the RHIM domain to prevent spurious activation [90]. In this scenario, the D161N alters the conformation of RIPK3 so that the RHIM domain is exposed for binding to RIPK1 to initiate apoptosis. This model predicts that the kinase and RHIM domains collaborate to control scaffolding of the necroptotic and apoptotic machineries. Some RIPK3 inhibitors were also found to induce apoptosis in a similar way through RHIM-dependent RIPK1 docking and subsequent FADD/CASP8-mediated apoptosis [70, 89]. Note that RIPK3 has also been reported to positively contribute to RIPK1-dependent apoptosis independently of its kinase activity but remarkably also of its RHIM domain [37]. While TNF signaling typically requires RIPK1 to activate RIPK3 in order to induce necroptosis, it has been noted that TNF can trigger RIPK3 activation even in the absence of RIPK1 if RIPK3 levels are high enough [91]. In the absence of RIPK1 and the presence of elevated levels of RIPK3, TNF can activate RIPK3 to induce cell death by both a caspase-8-dependent mechanism and a caspase-independent mechanism [37, 91]. Finally, similar to depletion of RIPK1 [34, 76], blocking TNF-induced necroptosis by suppressing RIPK3 or MLKL toggles the cell death response to apoptosis, albeit with different kinetics [92]. Collectively, these studies indicate that precise control of the complex II machinery is necessary to prevent a lethal imbalance of necroptotic or apoptotic pathways.

Concluding remarks

There has been a revival of interest in the close interconnection between cell death and inflammation originally recognized by Virchow. This interconnection is emphasized by some recent findings that classical cell death inducers such as caspase-8 and RIPK3 seem to act also upstream of inflammasome activation in a cell autonomous way [93-98]. However, the precise mechanisms of this interaction are unclear. RIPK1 as well as RIPK3 and other cytosolic TNFR complex II components have been implicated in regulating cell death and inflammation, though if these functions could be uncoupled is not clear. In addition, the potential signal transduction interplay between parenchymal cell necrosis and some forms of necrosis that occur in immune cells, such as pyroptosis and netosis, remains unknown. Considering the central role of RHIM domains in controlling the cell death induced by several stimuli, small molecules that disrupt RHIM signaling might also be therapeutically useful. The number of genetic (Table 3) and pharmacological studies (Table 4) demonstrating an important role for RIPK1, RIPK3 or MLKL in murine experimental disease models is still increasing, highlighting the therapeutic potential of these necrosome members. In addition, the expression and activation of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL is being increasingly explored in biopsies of patients with particular pathologies driven by cell death and inflammation (Table 5). The availability of new phospho-specific antibodies, pharmacologic inhibitors and transgenic models will allow us to document further the role of necroptosis in degenerative, inflammatory and infectious diseases. It is noteworthy that therapeutic targeting of only necroptosis might be insufficient in some complex pathologies, as exemplified by the additive protective effect of targeting different types of regulated necrosis [99-101]. This observed redundancy of necrosome proteins and interplay between different modalities of necrotic cell death in vivo is an intriguing topic for further research and will generate further insight into how the targeting of these molecules in some cases looks very effective.
Table 3

Overview of genetic necroptosis studies in experimental mouse pathologies

Genetic defectMajor findingReferences
RIPK3KO Protects against pancreatitis[6, 42]
Sensitizes to vaccinia virus infection[43]
Protects against photoreceptor loss (+Nec-1)[102]
Protects against TNF-induced SIRS[103]
Partially protects from macrophage death and enhances bacterial control upon Salmonella infection[104]
Rescues the mid-gestation defect of cIap2/1-deficient embryos[105]
Protects against intracerebroventricular injection of TNF in mouse hippocampus[106]
Improves clearance of Staphylococcus aureus (+Nec-1s)[107]
Diminishes cutaneous wound healing[108]
Protects against ethanol-induced liver injury[109]
Protects from macrophage necroptosis in atherosclerosis development[110, 111]
Rescues mild systemic inflammatory disease in macrophage-specific CASP8 knockouts[112]
Protects against cone cell necrosis in a mouse model of inherited degeneration[113]
Protects against dsRNA-induced retinal degeneration[114]
Protects against myocardial infarction[115]
Protects against non-alcoholic steatohepatitis[116]
Partial rescue of TRAF-2-deficient mice[117]
Protects against Gaucher’s disease[118]
Protects against Ppm1b-mediated sensitization to TNF-induced SIRS[119]
Protects RIPK1E-KO from skin inflammation[12]
MLKLKO Deficiency of RIPK3 or MLKL does not protect against shock induced by cecal ligation and punctureMLKL deficiency protects against pancreatitis[7]
Nec-1 treatment and RIPK3 or MLKL deficiency protect against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury[120]
Acetaminophen-induced liver toxicity occurs through RIPK1 but independently of RIPK3 and MLKL[121, 122]
No difference in diabetes onset by RIPK3- or MLKL-deficiency[123]
RIPK3 or MLKL deficiency partially protects from inflammation induced by sharpin deficiency[124]
RIPK1IEC−KO RIPK1 protects the intestinal epithelium against apoptosis[12, 13]
RIPK1E-KO RIPK1 partially protects the skin from necroptosis[12]
RIPK3K51A Viable and fertile[89]
RIPK3D161N Embryonic lethality rescued by Casp8-deficiency[11]
RIPK1K45A Protect Sharpin-deficient mice from inflammation[83]
RIPK1D138N Protects against TNF-induced shock[11, 84]
Does not protect against necroptosis of FADD-deficient IEC cells[12]
RIPK1/3/CASP8KO Rescue Ripk1−/− neonatal lethality by Ripk3 and Casp8 depletion[14, 85][10]
RIPK3/CypDKO Protects against renal ischemia reperfusion injury[100]
Table 4

Overview of pharmacologic targeting of necroptosis in experimental rodent pathologies

Pharmacologic agentMajor findingReferences
Nec-1Alleviates ischemic brain injury[47]
Is cardioprotective[175]
Improves outcome after controlled cortical impact[176]
Alleviates retinal ischemia reperfusion injury[177]
Alleviates spinal cord injury pathology in rats[178]
Alleviates injury in subtotal nephrectomised rats[179]
Nec-1sNec-1s treatment reduces disease severity in experimental autoimmune encephalitis model[180]
NSANec-1 or NSA block death in models of both sporadic and familial ALS (ex vivo)[181]
DabrafenibTargets RIPK3 and alleviates acetaminophen-induced liver injury[182]
Upregulated RIPK3 expression potentiates MLKL phosphorylation-mediated programmed necrosis in toxic epidermal necrolysis[183]
Nec-1, SanglifehrinA, 16-86Protects from renal ischemia reperfusion injury[99]
Nec-1, cyclosporine A, 3-ABProtects from remote lung injury after receiving ischemic renal allografts in rats[101]
Table 5

Overview of studies linking necroptosis to human pathologies

DiseaseMajor findingReferences
Ovarian cancerLow MLKL expression associated with poor prognosis[184]
Inflammatory bowel diseaseHigh RIPK3 and MLKL expression[185]
Drug-induced liver injuryPhosphorylated MLKL in biopsies[56]
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseIncreased levels of RIPK3 in lung epithelial cells[151]
Multiple sclerosisIncreased levels of RIPK1, RIPK3 and necrosome formation in lesions[180]
Breast cancerWeak RIPK3 expression[158]
MelanomaMelanoma cell lines lack RIPK3 expression, whereas primary melanocytes strongly express RIPK3[186]
HIVDysfunctional HIV-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation is associated with increased caspase-8 activity and mediated by necroptosis[187]
LeukemiaRIPK3 is downregulated[188]
Overview of genetic necroptosis studies in experimental mouse pathologies Overview of pharmacologic targeting of necroptosis in experimental rodent pathologies Overview of studies linking necroptosis to human pathologies
  186 in total

1.  RIPK1- and RIPK3-induced cell death mode is determined by target availability.

Authors:  W D Cook; D M Moujalled; T J Ralph; P Lock; S N Young; J M Murphy; D L Vaux
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  Distinct roles of RIP1-RIP3 hetero- and RIP3-RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis.

Authors:  X-N Wu; Z-H Yang; X-K Wang; Y Zhang; H Wan; Y Song; X Chen; J Shao; J Han
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  RIPK1 maintains epithelial homeostasis by inhibiting apoptosis and necroptosis.

Authors:  Marius Dannappel; Katerina Vlantis; Snehlata Kumari; Apostolos Polykratis; Chun Kim; Laurens Wachsmuth; Christina Eftychi; Juan Lin; Teresa Corona; Nicole Hermance; Matija Zelic; Petra Kirsch; Marijana Basic; Andre Bleich; Michelle Kelliher; Manolis Pasparakis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  IAPs limit activation of RIP kinases by TNF receptor 1 during development.

Authors:  Maryline Moulin; Holly Anderton; Anne K Voss; Tim Thomas; Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong; Aleksandra Bankovacki; Rebecca Feltham; Diep Chau; Wendy D Cook; John Silke; David L Vaux
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Activity of protein kinase RIPK3 determines whether cells die by necroptosis or apoptosis.

Authors:  Kim Newton; Debra L Dugger; Katherine E Wickliffe; Neeraj Kapoor; M Cristina de Almagro; Domagoj Vucic; Laszlo Komuves; Ronald E Ferrando; Dorothy M French; Joshua Webster; Merone Roose-Girma; Søren Warming; Vishva M Dixit
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Tipping the balance between necrosis and apoptosis in human and murine cells treated with interferon and dsRNA.

Authors:  M Kalai; G Van Loo; T Vanden Berghe; A Meeus; W Burm; X Saelens; P Vandenabeele
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  RIP1 suppresses innate immune necrotic as well as apoptotic cell death during mammalian parturition.

Authors:  William J Kaiser; Lisa P Daley-Bauer; Roshan J Thapa; Pratyusha Mandal; Scott B Berger; Chunzi Huang; Aarthi Sundararajan; Hongyan Guo; Linda Roback; Samuel H Speck; John Bertin; Peter J Gough; Siddharth Balachandran; Edward S Mocarski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cutting Edge: RIP1 kinase activity is dispensable for normal development but is a key regulator of inflammation in SHARPIN-deficient mice.

Authors:  Scott B Berger; Viera Kasparcova; Sandy Hoffman; Barb Swift; Lauren Dare; Michelle Schaeffer; Carol Capriotti; Michael Cook; Joshua Finger; Angela Hughes-Earle; Philip A Harris; William J Kaiser; Edward S Mocarski; John Bertin; Peter J Gough
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation.

Authors:  Young Sik Cho; Sreerupa Challa; David Moquin; Ryan Genga; Tathagat Dutta Ray; Melissa Guildford; Francis Ka-Ming Chan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  RIPK3 promotes cell death and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the absence of MLKL.

Authors:  Kate E Lawlor; Nufail Khan; Alison Mildenhall; Motti Gerlic; Ben A Croker; Akshay A D'Cruz; Cathrine Hall; Sukhdeep Kaur Spall; Holly Anderton; Seth L Masters; Maryam Rashidi; Ian P Wicks; Warren S Alexander; Yasuhiro Mitsuuchi; Christopher A Benetatos; Stephen M Condon; W Wei-Lynn Wong; John Silke; David L Vaux; James E Vince
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  46 in total

1.  Cell cycle arrest in mitosis promotes interferon-induced necroptosis.

Authors:  Tanja Frank; Marcel Tuppi; Manuela Hugle; Volker Dötsch; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Simone Fulda
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  The small molecule that packs a punch: ubiquitin-mediated regulation of RIPK1/FADD/caspase-8 complexes.

Authors:  Rebecca Feltham; John Silke
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine-Protein Kinase 3 (RIPK3)-Mixed Lineage Kinase Domain-Like Protein (MLKL)-Mediated Necroptosis Contributes to Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of Steatotic Livers.

Authors:  Hong-Min Ni; Xiaojuan Chao; Joshua Kaseff; Fengyan Deng; Shaogui Wang; Ying-Hong Shi; Tiangang Li; Wen-Xing Ding; Hartmut Jaeschke
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Programmed cell death as a defence against infection.

Authors:  Ine Jorgensen; Manira Rayamajhi; Edward A Miao
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  ZBP1/DAI Drives RIPK3-Mediated Cell Death Induced by IFNs in the Absence of RIPK1.

Authors:  Justin P Ingram; Roshan J Thapa; Amanda Fisher; Bart Tummers; Ting Zhang; Chaoran Yin; Diego A Rodriguez; Hongyan Guo; Rebecca Lane; Riley Williams; Michael J Slifker; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Glenn F Rall; Christopher P Dillon; Douglas R Green; William J Kaiser; Siddharth Balachandran
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Death receptor 3 mediates necroptotic cell death.

Authors:  Sebastian Bittner; Gertrud Knoll; Martin Ehrenschwender
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  ESCRT-III Acts Downstream of MLKL to Regulate Necroptotic Cell Death and Its Consequences.

Authors:  Yi-Nan Gong; Cliff Guy; Hannes Olauson; Jan Ulrich Becker; Mao Yang; Patrick Fitzgerald; Andreas Linkermann; Douglas R Green
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Danger signals in liver injury and restoration of homeostasis.

Authors:  Hui Han; Romain Desert; Sukanta Das; Zhuolun Song; Dipti Athavale; Xiaodong Ge; Natalia Nieto
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 9.  Programmed Cell Death in the Evolutionary Race against Bacterial Virulence Factors.

Authors:  Carolyn A Lacey; Edward A Miao
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Death Processes in Bovine Theca and Granulosa Cells Modelled and Analysed Using a Systems Biology Approach.

Authors:  Malgorzata J McEvoy; Emilia Sinderewicz; Leo Creedon; Marion McAfee; Agnieszka W Jonczyk; Katarzyna K Piotrowska-Tomala; Dariusz J Skarzynski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.