Literature DB >> 27052022

Clinicopathologic features of ovarian neoplasms with emphasis on borderline ovarian tumors: an institutional perspective.

Atif Ali Hashmi1, Zubaida Fida Hussain1, Aneel Roy Bhagwani1, Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi2, Naveen Faridi1, Syed Danish Hussain3, Mehmood Khan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and it represents third most common malignancy in Karachi (after breast and oral cancer). Due to lack of well established cancer registry in our country, changing trends of ovarian tumors has not been determined. Therefore we aimed to establish the current trends and classification of ovarian tumors in our setup according to latest WHO guidelines.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 162 cases of ovarian tumors that underwent surgical resection from January 2009 till December 2014. Specimens were received in histopathology department, Liaquat National hospital and cases were examined by senior histopathologists and classified according to latest WHO guidelines. Various histopathologic parameters including capsular invasion, omental and lymph node meatstasis along with uterine and fallopian tube involvement were determined apart from tumor type and grade.
RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 35.8 years (± 15.5). surface epithelial tumors were most common, 109 cases (67.2%) followed by germ cell tumors, 44 cases (27.1%) and sex cord stromal tumors, 8 cases (4.9%). Serous tumors were most common surface epithelial tumors with 90% benign morphology. On the other hand, mucinous tumors showed a higher percentage of borderline and malignant features (16.7 and 14.6% respectively). Higher incidence of capsular invasion and omental metastasis was noted in endometroid and serous carcinoma compared to mucinous tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: We noted a higher frequency of young age ovarian cancers in our set up. Serous and endometroid carcinomas were found to be associated with adverse prognostic factors like capsular invasion and omental metastasis. Moreover a significantly higher proportion of ovarian tumors constitute mucinous histology including borderline tumors. Whether this represents a changing trend towards biology of these tumors in this part of the world needs to be uncovered by further studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mucinous ovarian tumors; Ovarian tumors; Pakistan

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27052022      PMCID: PMC4822320          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2015-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Background

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and owing to lack of early symptoms and screening protocol, it is detected late in the clinical course of the disease. The worldwide incidence rate is 6.3/100,000 women and is the seventh most common cancer diagnosis. Ovarian cancer is the third most malignancy in Karachi (after breast and oral cancer) with an age standardized incidence rate of 10.9 % [1]. The high incidence of ovarian cancer in this part of the world may be due to uncovered BRCA mutations in our population, but this is yet to be fully determined. One of the unique characteristics of ovarian tumors are their capacity to undergo peritoneal metastasis in the absence of invasive growth in the ovary [13]. This has led to the concept of borderline tumors with a strict histologic criteria not influenced by its metastatic counterpart in the peritoneum. Due to lack of well established cancer registry in our country, changing trends of ovarian tumors has not been determined. Therefore we aimed to establish the current trends and classification of ovarian tumors in our setup according to latest WHO guidelines.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 162 cases of ovarian tumors that underwent surgical resection from January 2009 till December 2014. During this period of time, all cases with a provisional diagnosis of ovarian tumors requiring surgical treatment were included in the study. Out of the 162 cases included in the study, 35 had a provisional or frozen section diagnosis of malignancy and thus underwent bilateral oophorectomy along with total abdominal hysterectomy and omental, pelvic lymph nodes sampling. On the other hand, 127 cases were benign and thus underwent oophorectomy only. All specimens were received in histopathology department, Liaquat National hospital. After gross examination, representative sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stains. Immunohistochemical stains were applied when necessary. Cases were examined by senior histopathologists and classified according latest WHO guidelines. Various histopathologic parameters including capsular invasion, omental and lymph node metastasis along with uterine and fallopian tube involvement were determined apart from tumor type and grade.

Results

Mean age at diagnosis was 35.8 years (± 15.5). Surface epithelial tumors were most common, 109 cases (67.2 %) followed by germ cell tumors, 44 cases (27.1 %) and sex cord stromal tumors, 8 cases (4.9 %). Serous tumors were most common surface epithelial tumors with 90 % benign morphology. On the other hand mucinous tumors showed a higher percentage of borderline and malignant features (16.7 and 14.6 % respectively). Malignant surface epithelial tumors were significantly seen to be more common in older age group compared to their benign and borderline counterparts (Table 1). Malignant surface epithelial tumors also tend to had larger sizes compared to benign and borderline cases (Table 2). Table 3 shows various histopathologic parameters of ovarian tumors. Higher incidence of capsular invasion and omental metastasis was noted in endometroid and serous carcinoma compared to mucinous tumors. On the other hand, high frequency of ovarian capsular involvement was seen in malignant germ cell tumors and fibrosarcoma. Uterine and cervical involvement was also noted in a subset of serous and mucinous carcinomas.
Table 1

Age distribution of ovarian tumors

Age groups
<20 years20–40 years40–60 years>60 years
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Surface epithelial tumor
 Benign14 (17.1)44 (53.7)18 (22)6 (7.3)
 Borderline2 (25.0)4 (50)2 (25)0 (0)
 Malignant0 (0)7 (38.9)4 (22.2)7 (38.9)
Germ cell tumor
 Benign3 (8.1)27 (73.0)5 (13.5)2 (5.4)
 Malignant4 (66.7)2 (33.3)0 (0)0 (0)
Sex cord stromal tumor
 Benign1 (14.3)3 (42.9)0 (0)3 (42.9)
 Malignant0 (0)1 (100.0)0 (0)0 (0)
Metastatic tumor
 Malignant0 (0)0 (0)1 (100)0 (0)
Table 2

Tumor size distribution of ovarian neoplasms

Tumor sizeTumor size category
Mean<5 cm5–10 cm10–20 cm>20 cm
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Surface epithelial tumor
 Benign10.3115 (18.3)36 (43.9)27 (32.9)4 (4.9)
 Borderline19.560 (0)0 (0)6 (66.7)3 (33.3)
 Malignant19.081 (5.6)3 (16.7)6 (33.3)8 (44.4)
Germ cell tumor
 Benign10.414 (10.5)19 (50)13 (34.2)2 (5.3)
 Malignant14.151 (16.7)0 (0)4 (66.7)1 (16.7)
Sex cord stromal tumor
 Benign15.070 (0)2 (28.6)4 (57.1)1 (14.3)
 Malignant23.00 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (100.0)
Secondary malignancy
 Malignant6.00 (0)1 (100)0 (0)0 (0)
Table 3

Histopathologic characteristics of borderline and malignant ovarian tumors

Capsular invasionOmental metastasisPelvic lymph node metastasisUterine involvementCervical involvementContalateral ovarian involvementFallopian tube involvement
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Borderline
 Serous tumours0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
 Mucinous tumours0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Malignant
 Serous tumours2 (50)1 (25)1 (25)1 (25)0 (0)0 (0)1 (25)
 Mucinous tumours1 (14.3)2 (28.6)1 (14.3)1 (14.3)1 (14.3)0 (0)1 (14.3)
 Endometrioid carcinoma3 (75)2 (40)0 (0)1 (20)0 (0)0 (0)3 (60)
 Transitional cell car0 (0)1 (100)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
 Dysgerminoma1 (50)1 (50)0 (0)1 (50)1 (50)0 (0)0 (0)
 Yolk sac tumor1 (100)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
 Fibrosarcoma1 (100)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Age distribution of ovarian tumors Tumor size distribution of ovarian neoplasms Histopathologic characteristics of borderline and malignant ovarian tumors

Discussion

Ovarian cancers are the most common malignancies of the female genital tract and the 6th leading cancer in USA. It is estimated that the lifetime risk of developing an ovarian cancer among females is 1 in 70 [1]. Ovarian carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms showing diverse morphological characteristics, mechanisms of pathogenesis and clinical features [2]. According to morphological features, ovarian tumors are classified as surface epithelial tumors, germ cell tumors, sex cord stromal tumors and metastatic tumors. The mean age of patients with these tumors is 63 years with 80 % of the tumors occurring after 45 years of age [3]. However our study shows that the mean age of tumors has significantly lower and more cases of ovarian tumors were seen in females at comparatively younger ages. Approximately 40 % of malignant surface epithelial ovarian tumors were found in an age group of 20–40 years. Due to lack of cancer registries in our country, the demographics of ovarian cancer are poorly understood. Various studies conducted in our population revealed a lower age group distribution of breast cancer in this part of the world due to probable BRCA mutations may play a role in young age ovarian cancer as well [4]. Liaquat National Hospital is one of the largest tertiary care centre of the province and represents both rural and urban patient population of all age groups, therefore lower age distribution of ovarian cancer in our study don’t represent hospital demographics. The distribution of these tumors shows variations in the incidence globally. Surface epithelial tumors were found to be the most common ovarian tumors. The incidence of these tumors in our study (67.2 %) is comparable to a previous study done in the same region [5]. However studies done from other areas of Pakistan have shown slight variation in the incidence of these tumors. The frequency of surface epithelial tumors from Punjab province was found to be 57 % [6] and KPK province was found to be 76.5 % respectively [7]. Surface epithelial tumors were followed by germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors. The frequency of these tumors was found to be 27 and 4.9 % respectively in our study comparable to the literature from other parts of the country [6, 7]. In our study majority of these tumors were benign and only a few cases of borderline and malignant category were found. The most common tumors were benign serous tumors accounting for 90 % of the serous surface epithelial tumors and 44.9 % of all surface epithelial tumors, mostly presenting in females of the reproductive age group. However our study is almost consistent with the findings of study done by Ghartimagar et al. which showed an incidence of benign serous surface epithelial tumors 49.4 % among of all surface epithelial tumors [8]. Benign serous tumors were followed by mucinous and endometroid tumors. It was noted that although majority of mucinous tumors were benign there was a higher incidence of mucinous tumors of the borderline category. Literature shows that the majority of the mucinous tumors are benign, 20 % borderline and 5 % invasive [9]. A recent review by J. Prat showed similar results indicating that majority of mucinous tumors i.e., 80 % are benign remainder are borderline and 3–4 % of the tumors being malignant [10]. On the other hand, our study showed similar results for the benign and borderline categories but there was a higher incidence of invasive mucinous neoplasms, 14.6 % compared to 5 % cited in literature. This shows that the incidence of invasive mucinous tumors is much higher in our population as compared to literature from the west. Germ cell tumors comprised of 27 % of all the ovarian neoplasms in our study. Of which majority of these tumors (86 %) were mature teratomas whereas rests of the tumors were malignant germ cell neoplasms. This proportion of germ cell tumors corresponded to the results of a study done in India by Mondal et al. however the similar study showed a slightly higher numbers of other germ cell tumors which were not present in our study [11]. Sex cord stromal tumors accounted for 4.9 % of all ovarian neoplasms and majority of tumors comprised of benign tumors. The incidence of these tumors corresponds with literature as being the least common subtype of ovarian tumors [12, 13]. The main limitation of this study is that it is a single center experience and thus referral bias may be a limiting factor.

Conclusions

We found a higher frequency of young age ovarian cancers in our setup. Serous and endometroid carcinomas were found to be associated with adverse prognostic factors like capsular invasion and omental metastasis. Moreover a significantly higher proportion of ovarian tumors constitute mucinous histology including borderline tumors. Whether this represents a changing trend towards biology of these tumors in this part of the world needs to be uncovered by further studies.
  7 in total

1.  Histologic pattern, bilaterality and clinical evaluation of 957 ovarian neoplasms: a 10-year study in a tertiary hospital of eastern India.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Mondal; Ranjana Banyopadhyay; Dipanwita Roy Nag; Suprio Roychowdhury; Palash Kumar Mondal; Swapan Kumar Sinha
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.805

2.  Clinicohistological pattern of ovarian tumours in Peshawar region.

Authors:  Sumaira Yasmin; Aiman Yasmin; Mohammad Asif
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec

3.  Histological pattern of ovarian neoplasma.

Authors:  Z Ahmad; N Kayani; S H Hasan; S Muzaffar; M S Gill
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.781

4.  Peritoneal implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors. Histologic features and prognosis.

Authors:  D A Bell; M A Weinstock; R E Scully
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  New insights into ovarian cancer pathology.

Authors:  J Prat
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Molecular subtypes of breast cancer in South Asian population by immunohistochemical profile and Her2neu gene amplification by FISH technique: association with other clinicopathologic parameters.

Authors:  Atif Ali Hashmi; Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi; Hanna Naqvi; Amna Khurshid; Naveen Faridi
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 7.  My approach to and thoughts on the typing of ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  W G McCluggage
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  An Incidental Finding of Bilateral Dysgerminoma During Cesarean Section: Dilemmas in Management.

Authors:  Mamta Gupta; Rita Jindal; Vandana Saini
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

2.  Global epidemiology, risk factors, and histological types of ovarian cancers in Trinidad.

Authors:  Srikanth Umakanthan; Vijay K Chattu; Sherene Kalloo
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-03

3.  Ovarian neoplasia in adolescence: a retrospective chart review of girls with neoplastic ovarian tumors in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Lateefa AlDakhil; Asma Aljuhaimi; Mashael AlKhattabi; Saleh Alobaid; Rafif E Mattar; Abdulaziz Alobaid
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.506

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.