Literature DB >> 27051787

Glioblastoma multiforme as initial internal malignancy in Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS).

Michael D Lehrer1, Henry Lynch2, David J Glembocki3, Neel B Patel3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNS, central nervous system; IHC, immunohistochemistry; Lynch syndrome; MLH; MMR, mismatch repair; MSH-2; MTS, Muir-Torre syndrome; Muir-Torre syndrome; familial cancer; glioblastoma multiforme; hereditary cancer; mismatch repair; sebaceoma; sebaceous carcinoma

Year:  2015        PMID: 27051787      PMCID: PMC4809399          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2015.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAAD Case Rep        ISSN: 2352-5126


× No keyword cloud information.
Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) is an autosomal-dominant variant of Lynch hereditary cancer syndrome. MTS is defined by sebaceous neoplasms occurring in association with 1 or more internal malignancies. The sebaceous neoplasms that characterize MTS are rare among the general population and include sebaceous adenoma, sebaceoma, sebaceous carcinoma, keratoacanthoma with sebaceous differentiation, and basal cell carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation. A recent case series described several central nervous system (CNS) malignancies associated with MTS occurring after the development of colon cancer. We report a case of MTS with glioblastoma multiforme as the initial internal malignancy.

Case report

A 69-year-old Caucasian man presented for evaluation of 2 separate orange-yellow papules with telangiectases of the side of the neck and upper aspect of the back (Fig 1). Shave biopsy specimen of the lesions demonstrated sebaceous carcinoma and sebaceous adenoma, respectively. He had a personal history of 3 prior sebaceous carcinomas diagnosed at age 58, 65, and 68 years and 1 sebaceous adenoma diagnosed at age 66 years. In addition he had a family history of colon, breast, and renal carcinoma in his grandfather, mother, and brother, respectively. The patient had no personal history of internal malignancy. Because of family history and multiple sebaceous neoplasms, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MSH-2, MSH-6, MLH-1, and PMS-2 was performed on tumor samples. IHC demonstrated loss of nuclear expression of MSH-2 and MSH-6 with retained expression of MLH-1 and PMS-2. Subsequent genetic testing of the patient and his brother indicated a germline mutation in MSH-2. Based on these results a diagnosis of MTS was suspected, although our patient had not yet had an internal malignancy. The patient underwent screening colonoscopy, which revealed negative findings for colorectal carcinoma.
Fig 1

Orange-yellow papule with telangectasis located on left side of neck of 69-year-old Caucasian man.

Less than 1 year later the patient began experiencing episodes of expressive aphasia, visual disturbance, and memory difficulty. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed scattered lesions in the left temporal lobe and left putamen (Fig 2). Biopsy specimen of the lesions confirmed the diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme World Health Organization grade IV. IHC was performed on tumor specimens, which demonstrated loss of expression of MSH-2 and MSH-6 with maintained expression of MLH-1, consistent with his diagnosis of MTS (Fig 3).
Fig 2

T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging of glioblastoma multiforme in left temporal lobe.

Fig 3

Immunohistochemical staining for MSH-2 (A) and MLH-1 (B) in glioblastoma tumor sections. Staining of sebaceous carcinoma showed similar staining pattern. Note the absence of MSH-2 nuclear staining and the maintenance of MLH-1 nuclear staining.

Discussion

MTS is a variant of Lynch syndrome with sebaceous and internal neoplasms demonstrating microsatellite instability and mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MSH-2, MLH-1, and MSH-6.4, 5 The internal malignancies most commonly associated with MTS include: colorectal, urogenital, breast, and upper gastrointestinal. Sebaceous neoplasms precede or occur simultaneously with the diagnosis of internal malignancy in 28% to 41% of patients with MTS.2, 6 Glioblastoma multiforme occurs in 1.2% to 6.3% of patients with MSH-2 mutation dependent Lynch syndrome, but is not commonly reported in patients given a diagnosis of MTS.7, 8 Our patient had an extensive history of sebaceous neoplasms including 4 cases of sebaceous carcinoma and 2 cases of sebaceous adenoma. The sebaceous neoplasms in our patient predated the development of CNS malignancy by 11 years. Interestingly, routine screening colonoscopies revealed negative results for both our patient and his brother. Although the patient's mother and maternal grandfather had an extensive cancer history including diagnosis in their early 40s, neither of them were aware of the Lynch syndrome diagnosis. Our patient was the only member of his family to develop sebaceous neoplasms characteristic of MTS. A recent report by Kurtzman et al described 7 cases of CNS malignancy occurring in patients given a diagnosis of MTS. In each of the previous cases a diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma (age 41-50 years) preceded the diagnosis of CNS malignancy. This was notably absent in our patient. Sebaceous adenoma was the most commonly diagnosed sebaceous neoplasm in these cases (5 of 7 patients), whereas sebaceous carcinoma was diagnosed in 3 of 7 patients. Sebaceous adenomas occurred as multiple neoplasms in all but 2 patients, whereas sebaceous carcinomas occurred as isolated lesions in all but our patient. Sebaceous neoplasms were diagnosed between the ages of 46 and 58 years. Five of the patients also reported a previous diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma or keratoacanthoma. CNS malignancy occurred between the ages of 45 and 68 years. A family history of CNS malignancy was positive in a majority of reported cases (6 of 7), which was also absent from our patient. Among patients given a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome there is heterogeneity of tumor development dependent on whether MSH-2 or MLH-1 is mutated. Mutations in MSH-2 are more commonly associated with CNS and upper urogenital carcinoma when compared with mutations in MLH-1, which are more commonly observed in patients with gastric and small bowel carcinoma. The predilection for upper urogenital tract carcinoma is consistent with our patient's family history. Several studies have examined MMR mutation frequencies within MTS, showing mutations in MSH-2 predominating over MLH-1, although mutations in MLH-1 are identified in a proportion of patients.4, 9, 10 It is important to note that all reported cases of CNS malignancy occurring in patients with MTS who underwent IHC demonstrated loss of function of MSH-2. Loss of nuclear expression of MSH-2 or MLH-1 in sebaceous neoplasms does not in itself define MTS. A significant number of sebaceous neoplasms demonstrate sporadic mutations in MMR genes resulting in a low specificity (48%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (22%) of MMR IHC in diagnosing MTS in patients without other history suggestive of the diagnosis. However, among patients with multiple sebaceous neoplasms (≥2), early diagnosis of sebaceous neoplasms (age <60 years), or a personal or family history of Lynch syndrome or related cancer, the specificity of MMR IHC increases significantly.12, 13 Once the diagnosis of MTS is established screening recommendations for associated malignancies are variable but generally include increased frequency and lower threshold for screening related to colon, breast, endometrial, urogenital, and small bowel carcinoma. Kurtzman et al also suggest neurologic screening as a component of routine cancer screening for patients with MTS. They suggest a baseline neurologic examination be performed at the time of MTS diagnosis and repeated annually. They also suggest that patients with a family history of CNS malignancy consider use of serial imaging for early detection of CNS malignancy. Although colon cancer is the most common initial internal malignancy in MTS, we report a case of CNS malignancy occurring in absence of preceding colorectal malignancy and in the absence of family history of CNS malignancy. Furthermore we would like to note that 100% of patients who underwent MMR IHC for CNS malignancy, including our patient, demonstrated loss of expression of MSH-2 and maintenance of MLH-1. Although MSH-2 mutations are by far the most common MMR mutations among patients with MTS this association further suggests loss of expression of MSH-2 as a risk factor for development of CNS malignancy. All patients with MTS who develop neurologic symptoms should have a low threshold for evaluation of possible CNS malignancy, especially those with family history of CNS malignancy or known MSH-2 germline mutations.
  13 in total

1.  A genotype-phenotype correlation in HNPCC: strong predominance of msh2 mutations in 41 patients with Muir-Torre syndrome.

Authors:  E Mangold; C Pagenstecher; M Leister; M Mathiak; A Rütten; W Friedl; P Propping; T Ruzicka; R Kruse
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Muir-Torre syndrome.

Authors:  Giovanni Ponti; Maurizio Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Muir-Torre Syndrome and Central Nervous System Malignancy: Highlighting an Uncommon Association.

Authors:  Drew J B Kurtzman; Andrew J Fabiano; Jingxin Qiu; Nathalie C Zeitouni
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 4.  Muir-Torre syndrome: case report of a patient with concurrent jejunal and ureteral cancer and a review of the literature.

Authors:  S Akhtar; K K Oza; S A Khan; J Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Microsatellite instability and expression of hMLH-1 and hMSH-2 in sebaceous gland carcinomas as markers for Muir-Torre syndrome.

Authors:  M M Entius; J J Keller; P Drillenburg; K C Kuypers; F M Giardiello; G J Offerhaus
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Microsatellite instability and immunostaining for MSH-2 and MLH-1 in cutaneous and internal tumors from patients with the Muir-Torre syndrome.

Authors:  Pilar Machin; Lluis Catasus; Cristina Pons; Josefina Muñoz; Jose Maria Conde-Zurita; Judith Balmaña; Maria Barnadas; Rosa M Martí; Jaime Prat; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.587

7.  Screening for Muir-Torre syndrome using mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry of sebaceous neoplasms.

Authors:  Maegan E Roberts; Douglas L Riegert-Johnson; Brittany C Thomas; Colleen S Thomas; Michael G Heckman; Murli Krishna; David J DiCaudo; Alina G Bridges; Katherine S Hunt; Kandelaria M Rumilla; Mark A Cappel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Glioblastoma multiforme in the Muir-Torre syndrome.

Authors:  Zev A Binder; Michael W Johnson; Avadhut Joshi; Christine L Hann; Constance A Griffin; Alessandro Olivi; Gregory J Riggins; Gary L Gallia
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  A clinical scoring system to identify patients with sebaceous neoplasms at risk for the Muir-Torre variant of Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Maegan E Roberts; Douglas L Riegert-Johnson; Brittany C Thomas; Kandelaria M Rumilla; Colleen S Thomas; Michael G Heckman; Jennifer U Purcell; Nancy B Hanson; Kathleen A Leppig; Justin Lim; Mark A Cappel
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts.

Authors:  Hans F A Vasen; Ignacio Blanco; Katja Aktan-Collan; Jessica P Gopie; Angel Alonso; Stefan Aretz; Inge Bernstein; Lucio Bertario; John Burn; Gabriel Capella; Chrystelle Colas; Christoph Engel; Ian M Frayling; Maurizio Genuardi; Karl Heinimann; Frederik J Hes; Shirley V Hodgson; John A Karagiannis; Fiona Lalloo; Annika Lindblom; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Pal Møller; Torben Myrhoj; Fokko M Nagengast; Yann Parc; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Julian R Sampson; Astrid Stormorken; Rolf H Sijmons; Sabine Tejpar; Huw J W Thomas; Nils Rahner; Juul T Wijnen; Heikki Juhani Järvinen; Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  How Should We Test for Lynch Syndrome? A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Richard Gallon; Peter Gawthorpe; Rachel L Phelps; Christine Hayes; Gillian M Borthwick; Mauro Santibanez-Koref; Michael S Jackson; John Burn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.