Literature DB >> 27051399

ABC3 Consensus: Assessment by a German Group of Experts.

Christoph Thomssen1, Doris Augustin2, Johannes Ettl3, Renate Haidinger4, Hans-Joachim Lück5, Diana Lüftner6, Frederik Marmé7, Norbert Marschner8, Lothar Müller9, Friedrich Overkamp10, Eugen Ruckhäberle11, Marc Thill12, Michael Untch13, Rachel Wuerstlein14, Nadia Harbeck14.   

Abstract

The Advanced Breast Cancer Third International Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer took place in Lisbon, Portugal, on November 5-7, 2015. This year's conference (ABC3) was focused on the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (stage IV), as it was 4 years ago at the first consensus meeting (ABC1). A matter of particular interest was the patients' perspective. Thus, patient-relevant issues were addressed by the consensus discussions, such as those on treatment goals, quality of life, care of long-term survivors ('survivorship issues'), and coping with disease-related symptoms and the side effects of treatment. Further important issues on the agenda were the use of standardized instruments for the assessment of individual treatment success ('patient-reported outcome measures') and the evaluation of the benefit of novel drugs (e.g. the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale). Diagnosis and treatment of inoperable locally advanced breast cancer had already been discussed 2 years earlier at the ABC2 Consensus and were not dealt with in the framework of this year's ABC3 Consensus. With regard to country-specific peculiarities, which unavoidably found their way into the ABC Consensus, a working group of German breast cancer experts commented on the voting results of the ABC panelists. As for the past consensus, the group specially considered the German guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (AGO (Gyneco-Oncology Working Group), S3, DGHO (German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology)) in order to adapt the ABC3 consensus for everyday therapy in Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABC3 Consensus 2015; Breast Cancer, metastatic; Patient-relevant issues

Year:  2016        PMID: 27051399      PMCID: PMC4813642          DOI: 10.1159/000443515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  12 in total

1.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2015.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Marc Thill; Volker Hanf; Florian Schuütz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Courtney Tyne; Douglas W Blayney; Diane Blum; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).

Authors:  N I Cherny; R Sullivan; U Dafni; J M Kerst; A Sobrero; C Zielinski; E G E de Vries; M J Piccart
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas C Turner; Jungsil Ro; Fabrice André; Sherene Loi; Sunil Verma; Hiroji Iwata; Nadia Harbeck; Sibylle Loibl; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Ke Zhang; Carla Giorgetti; Sophia Randolph; Maria Koehler; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  FACT: an open-label randomized phase III study of fulvestrant and anastrozole in combination compared with anastrozole alone as first-line therapy for patients with receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Bergh; Per-Ebbe Jönsson; Elisabet Kerstin Lidbrink; Maureen Trudeau; Wolfgang Eiermann; Daniel Brattström; Justin P O Lindemann; Fredrik Wiklund; Roger Henriksson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Combined tamoxifen and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist alone in premenopausal advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials.

Authors:  J G Klijn; R W Blamey; F Boccardo; T Tominaga; L Duchateau; R Sylvester
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Sunil Verma; David Miles; Luca Gianni; Ian E Krop; Manfred Welslau; José Baselga; Mark Pegram; Do-Youn Oh; Véronique Diéras; Ellie Guardino; Liang Fang; Michael W Lu; Steven Olsen; Kim Blackwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study.

Authors:  Kimberly L Blackwell; Harold J Burstein; Anna Maria Storniolo; Hope S Rugo; George Sledge; Gursel Aktan; Catherine Ellis; Allison Florance; Svetislava Vukelja; Joachim Bischoff; José Baselga; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Combination anastrozole and fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Rita S Mehta; William E Barlow; Kathy S Albain; Ted A Vandenberg; Shaker R Dakhil; Nagendra R Tirumali; Danika L Lew; Daniel F Hayes; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Palbociclib: First CDK4/6 Inhibitor in Clinical Practice for the Treatment of Advanced HR-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Johannes Ettl
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in oligometastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuka Inoue; Makoto Fujishima; Makiko Ono; Jun Masuda; Yukinori Ozaki; Tetsuyo Maeda; Natsue Uehiro; Yoko Takahashi; Takayuki Kobayashi; Takehiko Sakai; Tomo Osako; Takayuki Ueno; Shinji Ohno
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.624

3.  Do Patients with Luminal A Breast Cancer Profit from Adjuvant Systemic Therapy? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Joachim Diessner; Manfred Wischnewsky; Maria Blettner; Sebastian Häusler; Wolfgang Janni; Rolf Kreienberg; Roland Stein; Tanja Stüber; Lukas Schwentner; Catharina Bartmann; Achim Wöckel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  HER4 expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is associated with decreased sensitivity to tamoxifen treatment and reduced overall survival of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Anja Kathrin Wege; Dominik Chittka; Stefan Buchholz; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Simone Diermeier-Daucher; Florian Zeman; Olaf Ortmann; Gero Brockhoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.