| Literature DB >> 27051342 |
Feng Wen1, Ji-Hong Ma1, Hai Yu1, Fu-Ru Yang1, Meng Huang1, Yan-Jun Zhou1, Ze-Jun Li1, Xiu-Hui Wang1, Guo-Xin Li1, Yi-Feng Jiang1, Wu Tong1, Guang-Zhi Tong1.
Abstract
Swine influenza viruses (SwIVs) cause considerable morbidity and mortality in domestic pigs, resulting in a significant economic burden. Moreover, pigs have been considered to be a possible mixing vessel in which novel strains loom. Here, we developed and evaluated a novel M2e-multiple antigenic peptide (M2e-MAP) as a supplemental antigen for inactivated H3N2 vaccine to provide cross-protection against two main subtypes of SwIVs, H1N1 and H3N2. The novel tetra-branched MAP was constructed by fusing four copies of M2e to one copy of foreign T helper cell epitopes. A high-yield reassortant H3N2 virus was generated by plasmid based reverse genetics. The efficacy of the novel H3N2 inactivated vaccines with or without M2e-MAP supplementation was evaluated in a mouse model. M2e-MAP conjugated vaccine induced strong antibody responses in mice. Complete protection against the heterologous swine H1N1 virus was observed in mice vaccinated with M2e-MAP combined vaccine. Moreover, this novel peptide confers protection against lethal challenge of A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1). Taken together, our results suggest the combined immunization of reassortant inactivated H3N2 vaccine and the novel M2e-MAP provided cross-protection against swine and human viruses and may serve as a promising approach for influenza vaccine development.Entities:
Keywords: H3N2; M2e-multiple antigenic peptide; high-yield; inactivated vaccine; swine influenza virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27051342 PMCID: PMC4808646 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2016.17.1.71
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Sci ISSN: 1229-845X Impact factor: 1.672
Fig. 1Structure and sequence of synthetic M2e-multiple antigenic peptide (M2e-MAP).
Immunization schedule of mice
Fig. 2Antibody response induced by M2e-MAP combined vaccine. M2e-specific antibody and rgH3N2-specific antibody titers were determined by end-point ELISA. Mice were vaccinated with M2e-MAP+rgH3N2+Freund, rgH3N2+Freund and rgH3N2 subcutaneously. Mice receiving Freund were used as negative controls. Sera were collected at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after the first immunization. The titers were expressed as the highest serum dilution greater than twice the average absorbance value at OD450 nm of pre-vaccination sera. The data are expressed as the geometric mean titer ± standard deviation (SD) of 5 mice per group. The lower limit of detection (1 : 20 in A and 1 : 50 in B) is indicated by a dotted line. Experiments were repeated three times.
Results of hemagglutination inhibition (HI), neutralization tests (NTs) and virus titer of lungs on 3 dpi
Virus titer of lungs was determined on 3 dpi. The values were calculated by the method described by Reed-Muench and expressed as the mean log10 EID50/mL ± SD. The lower limit of detection of the virus was 1.0 log10 EID50/mL. *Groups of mice were injected subcutaneously with 2 doses of the M2e-MAP+rgH3N2+Freund, rgH2N2+Freund, rgH3N2 and Freund, respectively. †Serum samples were collected at two time points: 2 weeks after dose 1 and 2 weeks after dose 2. The mean values of influenza-specific IgG antibody titers in serum were calculated and shown as the means ± SD. ‡Neutralization antibody titers of serum collected at the same time as HI titers were calculated and shown as log10 means ± SD. §Mice were challenged intranasally 2 weeks post 1st boost with 106 EID50 of SwGD96, SwHLJ1 and 10LD50 of PR8 viruses.
Fig. 3Viral amounts in lungs on 3 dpi. Five mice in every challenge group were euthanized on 3 dpi and the viral amounts of lungs were determined by real time PCR. The values were expressed as the mean log10 viral copies/µL ± SD of 5 mice per challenge group. *Means in M2e-MAP+rgH3N2+Freund immunized and PR8 challenged group p < 0.001 compared to the other 4 immunized groups. **Means in M2e-MAP+rgH3N2 +Freund immunized and SwGD96 challenged group p < 0.001 compared to the remaining 4 groups. ***Indicates p < 0.001 for M2e-MAP+rgH3N2+Freund immunized and SwHLJ1 challenged group compared to the other 4 groups.
Fig. 4Histopathological changes in the lungs of virus challenged mice. Immunized mice were challenged by PR8 (A, D, G, and J), SwGD96 (B, E, H, and K) and SwHLJ1 (C, F, I, and L) and lungs were collected for histopathological analysis on 3 dpi. The figure indicates the representative imagines of histopathological observations of M2e-MAP+rgH3N2+Freund, rgH3N2+Freund, rgH3N2 and Freund, respectively. H&E stain. Scale bars = 50 µm.
Fig. 5Survival and body weight curve in PR8 challenged mice. Mice were challenged with 10LD50 of PR8 virus intranasally and monitored daily for 2 weeks post challenge. (A) Survival rate. The difference among the four groups is significant (p = 0.0002). (B) Percentage of mouse body weight. Each point represents the mean of 5 mice per group.