Literature DB >> 27051276

Sociodemographic factors affecting the quality of life of patients with asthma.

Bartosz Uchmanowicz1, Bernard Panaszek2, Izabella Uchmanowicz1, Joanna Rosińczuk3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increased interest in the subjective quality of life (QoL) of patients with bronchial asthma. Patients diagnosed with asthma experience a number of problems with regard to everyday activities and functions, which adversely affects their health-related QoL. AIM: The aim of this study is to analyze the sociodemographic factors affecting the QoL of patients with asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised of 100 patients (73 females and 27 males) aged 18-84 years (mean age 45.7 years) treated in the Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Geriatrics and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University. All patients with asthma who met the inclusion criteria participated in the study. We used medical record analysis and two questionnaires: the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) and the asthma control test. Up-to-date sociodemographic data were collected from all participants, including sex, age, marital status, education, and sources of income.
RESULTS: The sociodemographic variables that correlated positively with QoL in all domains of the AQLQ were professional activity and higher education level of respondents. Factors that negatively influenced the AQLQ domains were older age and lack of professional activity.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that age, physical work, and lack of professional activity decreased the QoL in this patient group. It was found that higher education contributes to better QoL scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bronchial asthma; health related quality of life; sociodemographic factors

Year:  2016        PMID: 27051276      PMCID: PMC4807939          DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S101898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence        ISSN: 1177-889X            Impact factor:   2.711


Introduction

The prevalence of bronchial asthma makes it a global public health issue. Estimates put the worldwide number of patients with asthma at ~300 million and the number of deaths at ~250,000 a year.1 The concept of a holistic approach to patient care is based on the 1948 World Health Organization’s definition of health. This involves providing the patients not only with comprehensive medical care but also with psychological and social support.2 The creators of the holistic approach to medicine mainly intended this approach to yield better treatment outcomes3 in chronic diseases, including asthma. However, the aims of holistic care should also include engaging the patient in the therapeutic process.4 A natural consequence of the holistic approach to medicine was the search for alternative measures of treatment effectiveness. As a result, in the 1990s, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was introduced into clinical practice.5 HRQoL is defined as the functional effects of the illness and treatment, as perceived by the patient. Thus, HRQoL comprises such components as the clinical condition and physical fitness of patients, as well as their psychological condition, social status, and somatic sensations.3,5 Such a comprehensive assessment of the quality of life (QoL) of patients has a range of applications. It can be used, eg, to screen for patients requiring additional support, to assess the impact of the illness and its treatment on the patient, and to analyze the quality of medical services rendered.6 The results of studies performed to date, using both generic and specific questionnaires, enabled the identification of numerous factors that may affect HRQoL in patients with asthma. These include the demographic, clinical, and personality characteristics of patient. The demographic factors related to the HRQoL of patients with asthma identified so far include sex, age, marital status, and education.7–9 The objective of this study was to analyze the sociodemographic factors affecting the QoL of patients with asthma.

Patients

The study comprised 100 patients (73 females and 27 males) aged 18–84 years (mean age was 45.7 years) treated in the Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Geriatrics and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland, and in the Allergy Clinic at the Kosmonautów Nonpublic Health Center in Wroclaw, Poland. All patients with asthma meeting the inclusion criteria participated in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age 18 years or older, 2) a diagnosis of bronchial asthma, made at least 6 months before the study, according to the GINA 2012 criteria, and 3) informed consent expressed in writing. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) lack of consent, 2) psychological disorders, and 3) other disorders preventing survey completion. The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Wroclaw Medical University (approval no 40/2014).

Methods

This study incorporated the following methods and instruments: medical record analysis and two questionnaires the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) and the asthma control test. Up-to-date sociodemographic data were collected from all participants, including sex, age, marital status, education, and sources of income. All participants received surveys and an information sheet stating that participation was voluntary and completely anonymous. The surveys were completed in the presence of the researcher. All patients received the following questionnaires.

Adult AQLQ

It is an instrument comprising 32 items for adult patients with asthma. It aims to identify the areas of functioning that are impaired by asthma in the adult patients. The survey can be administered by a researcher or self-administered by the patient. It measures four domains: activity limitation (eleven items), emotional function (five items), exposure to environmental stimuli (four items), and symptoms (12 items). The patients describe their experience with the condition in the previous 2 weeks, using a 7-point scale (1, severely impaired; 7, not impaired at all). The higher the score, the better the QoL.10

Asthma control test

It comprises five questions regarding the frequency of dyspnea, waking due to the symptoms, the need for rescue medication, and control of the condition as perceived by the patient. The maximum score is 25 and indicates perfect control. Scores at 24–20 points indicate well-controlled asthma but not fully controlled asthma, while scores <20 points indicate uncontrolled asthma.11–13

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis for quantitative characteristics (measurable variables) involved the calculation of basic statistics, ie, mean, standard deviation (SD), median, and extreme values – minimum and maximum. The normality of quantitative variable distribution was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test at a significance level of P=0.05. The significance of differences between quantitative variables with normal distributions in two groups (sex) was verified using Student’s t-test for independent variables. If the distribution of a given variable significantly differed from normal or by variance, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test was used. Hypotheses on equality of means in more than two groups (eg, education and professional activity) were verified using either the analysis of variance (if variable distributions in all groups were not significantly different from normal) or the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test (for skewed distributions). The strength of correlations between two quantitative variables was determined using Spearman’s or Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rS or r). When correlation coefficients r were significantly different from zero, regression analysis was performed, with linear correlation model parameter values determined for the two variables (a and b) and correlation diagrams created, illustrating the dispersion of the variables against the mathematical model. The correlation of the quantitative variable (AQLQ) with several other variables (age and sex) was described using the multiple regression analysis. For qualitative variables (nominal or categorical), numbers (n) and percentages (%) were calculated. The independence of qualitative variables was verified using the chi-squared test. For all statistical tests, P<0.05 was used as a statistical significance criterion. Calculations were made using the STATISTICA Version 10 software and the MS Excel spreadsheets.

Results

The study included 100 patients (73 females and 23 males) aged 18–84 years (mean age was 45.7 years) treated in the Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Geriatrics and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of patients

Sociodemographic dataFemale (n)Male (N)%P-value
Sex7327100
Age (M ± SD)44.07±15.40
Residence
 Rural57120.0170
 Urban <100,000 residents11213
 Urban <500,000 residents909
 Urban >500,000 residents481866
Education
 Primary170170.0039
 Vocational14923
 High school29736
 College/university131124
Professional activity
 Working226280.3602
 Unemployed101
 Disability pension claimant161127
 Retired321042
 Other status202
Type of work
 Blue collar279380.3458
 White collar381657
 Others505
Marital status
 Married4424680.0155
 Single415
 Widowed21021
 Divorced426
Smoking
 No476530.0002
 Past212041
 Yes516
Cigarette smoking27220.4573
 M ± SD22±325±4
Number of cigarettes smoked per day27220.3601
 M ± SD17±1019±8
Duration of the illness (years)73270.1444
 M ± SD16.9±12.214.1±13.4

Note: Bold P-value indicates statistical significance.

Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Clinical characteristics of participants

Clinical dataFemale (n)Male (N)%P-value
Primary symptom
 Daytime dyspnea episodes6325880.5214
 Morning coughing729
 Night-time waking due to dyspnea303
Acute asthma episodes
 Daily (including nocturnal episodes)7125970.1191
 Daily (during the day)101
 3–4 per week011
 1 per week000
 1 per month000
 1 every several months011
Allergensa
 Animal dander23730
 Pollen261036
 Food37946
 Dust14115
Allergy clinic visits
 2 per month811190.0024
 1 per month24327
 6 per year17219
 3 per year8210
 Fewer16925
Number of hospitalizations due to asthma
 1–23214460.2648
 3–58614
 6–1012315
 >1021425
Histamine test
 Negative1710270.2622
 Positive561773
Comorbiditiesa
 Diabetes mellitus122140.4573
 Arterial hypertension291645
 Ischemic heart disease61117
 Rheumatic disorders7512
 Others19625
Asthma control test results
 M ± SD11.8±412.2±2.60.1465
 Me1112
 Min–max4–225–18
FEV1 (L)
 M ± SD2.51±0.572.49±0.630.9076
 Me2.702.60
 Min–max0.65–3.500.75–3.63
FVC (L)
 M ± SD3.19±0.843.17±0.470.8919
 Me3.213.20
 Min–max1.01–6.631.72–3.70
FEV1/FVC (−)
 M ± SD0.796±0.1230.777±0.1720.5593
 Me0.810.78
 Min–max0.41–1.170.39–1.32

Notes: Bold P-value indicates statistical significance; FEV1/FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio.

The sum of percentages exceeds 100 due to possible multiple selections.

Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; M, mean; Max, maximum; Me, median; Min, minimum.

Sociodemographic factors affecting the QoL as measured using AQLQ

Factors affecting the QoL in the symptoms domain of the AQLQ

The only sociodemographic variable for which a significant correlation was found with the QoL in the symptoms domain of the AQLQ was the professional activity of respondents. Post hoc analysis showed disability pensioners to have a significantly lower QoL in this domain than professionally active respondents (P=0.006; Table 3). QoL in the symptoms domain was not significantly affected by the type of work (P=0.170), sex (P=0.108), age (R=−0.184, P=0.066), education (R=0.180, P=0.077), residence (R=0.120, P=0.232), and marital status (P=0.695) of respondents (Table 3).
Table 3

Statistical characteristics for QoL in the symptoms domain of the AQLQ in relation to sociodemographic factors

CategorynMeLower quartileUpper quartileP-value
Sex
 Female733929470.108
 Male27312247
Age (Years)
 184540570.066
 27423349
 323412950
 430372547
 518302667
 68342359
 75323135
 81303030
Education
 Primary173930470.077
 Vocational23282249
 High school36342842
 College/university24453866
Professional activity
 Working284631690.005
 Unemployed1818181
 Disability pension claimant27261842
 Retired42393047
 Other benefits2393939
Type of work
 Blue collar363425470.170
 White collar54412947
 Others10302633
Residence
 Rural123128370.120
 Urban <100,000 residents13392847
 Urban <500,000 residents9412667
 Urban >500,000 residents66412947
Marital status
 Married683926490.695
 Single5444447
 Widowed21322843
 Divorced6413242

Note: Bold P-values indicate statistical significance.

Abbreviations: AQLQ, asthma quality of life questionnaire; Me, median; QoL, quality of life.

Factors affecting the QoL in the activity limitation domain of the AQLQ

QoL in the activity limitation domain was shown to decrease significantly as the age of respondents increased (R=−0.305, P=0.002; Table 4). It increased significantly with the education level of respondents (R=0.204, P=0.042; Table 4). Another significant correlation was found between QoL in the activity limitation domain of the AQLQ and the professional activity of respondents. Post hoc analysis showed disability pensioners to have a significantly lower QoL in this domain than professionally active respondents (P<0.001; Table 4). QoL in the activity limitation domain was not significantly affected by the type of work (P=0.154), sex (P=0.972), residence (R=0.076, P=0.454), and marital status (P=0.070) of respondents (Table 4).
Table 4

Statistical characteristics for QoL in the activity limitation domain of the AQLQ in relation to sociodemographic factors

CategorynMeLower quartileUpper quartileP-value
Sex
 Female733727470.972
 Male27363055
Age (years)
 183935600.002
 27443053
 323433755
 430362742
 518312144
 68372251
 75302338
 81161616
Education
 Primary173422470.042
 Vocational23332050
 High school36372943
 College/university24403652
Professional activity
 Working284738530.001
 Unemployed1434343
 Disability pension claimant27301341
 Retired42362743
 Other benefits2434343
Type of work
 Blue collar363821460.154
 White collar54373353
 Others10312743
Residence
 Rural123530380.454
 Urban <100,000 residents13413447
 Urban <500,000 residents9342663
 Urban >500,000 residents66392751
Marital status
 Married683730470.070
 Single5535353
 Widowed21302241
 Divorced6403657

Note: Bold P-values indicate statistical significance.

Abbreviations: AQLQ, asthma quality of life questionnaire; Me, median; QoL, quality of life.

Factors affecting the QoL in the emotional function domain of the AQLQ

QoL in the emotional function domain was shown to decrease significantly as the age of respondents increased (R=−0.197, P=0.049; Table 5). Another significant correlation was found between QoL in this domain of the AQLQ and the professional activity of respondents. Post hoc analysis showed disability pensioners to have a significantly lower QoL in the emotional function domain than professionally active respondents (P<0.021; Table 5). QoL in the emotional function domain was not significantly affected by the type of work (P=0.885), sex (P=0.473), education (R=0.047, P=0.643), residence (R=−0.016, P=0.873), and marital status (P=0.136) of respondents (Table 5).
Table 5

Statistical characteristics for QoL in the emotional function domain of the AQLQ in relation to sociodemographic factors

CategorynMeLower quartileUpper quartileP-value
Sex
 Female732015250.473
 Male27181328
Age (Years)
 182020250.049
 27201524
 323211729
 430201422
 518151126
 68171425
 75171518
 81222222
Education
 Primary172016220.643
 Vocational23181229
 High school36201322
 College/university24201729
Professional activity
 Working282416340.013
 Unemployed1353535
 Disability pension claimant27181220
 Retired42191622
 Other benefits2202020
Type of work
 Blue collar362013290.885
 White collar54201523
 Others10201524
Residence
 Rural121813260.873
 Urban <100,000 residents13202024
 Urban <500,000 residents9201222
 Urban >500,000 residents66191426
Marital status
 Married682015270.136
 Single5242133
 Widowed21191222
 Divorced6181419

Abbreviations: AQLQ, asthma quality of life questionnaire; Me, median; QoL, quality of life.

Factors affecting the QoL in the environmental stimuli domain of the AQLQ

QoL in the environmental stimuli domain was shown to decrease significantly as the age of respondents increased (R=−0.317, P=0.001; Table 6). Another significant correlation was found between QoL in this domain of the AQLQ and the type of work of respondents. Those in blue-collar jobs had a significantly lower QoL in the environmental stimuli domain than white-collar workers (P=0.034; Table 6). QoL in this domain was not significantly affected by the sex (P=0.724), education (R=0.131, P=0.195), residence (R=−0.131, P=0.193), professional activity (P=0.202), and marital status (P=0.460) of respondents (Table 6).
Table 6

Statistical characteristics for QoL in the environmental stimuli domain of the AQLQ in relation to sociodemographic factors

CategorynMeLower quartileUpper quartileP-value
Sex
 Female731510170.724
 Male2716720
Age (years)
 181614210.001
 27161121
 323171220
 430151017
 51811715
 6813721
 75141015
 81777
Education
 Primary171510180.195
 Vocational2311616
 High school36151018
 College/university24161219
Professional activity
 Working281510170.202
 Unemployed1252525
 Disability pension claimant2714520
 Retired42151218
 Other benefits2111111
Type of work
 Blue collar36127160.033
 White collar54161119
 Others1013616
Residence
 Rural121510160.193
 Urban <100,000 residents13171620
 Urban <500,000 residents9161024
 Urban >500,000 residents6614917
Marital status
 Married681611180.460
 Single5151115
 Widowed2112720
 Divorced6121021

Note: Bold P-value indicates statistical significance.

Abbreviations: AQLQ, asthma quality of life questionnaire; Me, median; QoL, quality of life.

Discussion

Patients diagnosed with asthma experience a number of problems with regard to everyday activities and functions, which adversely affects their HRQoL. This study shows that the sociodemographic determinants of subjective HRQoL are understood as the functional effects of the illness and its treatment, as perceived by the patients, and it reflects the four fundamental areas of functioning: physical health and fitness, psychological condition, somatic sensations, and socioeconomic standing of patients. What is clearly noticeable is that HRQoL is a multidimensional concept reflecting numerous aspects of human functioning. It is, however, highly subjective and dependent on the psychological state, personality, preferences, and values of an individual. The results of studies performed to date, using both generic and specific questionnaires, enabled the identification of numerous factors that may affect the HRQoL in patients with asthma. This study identified a number of determinants affecting the QoL of patients with asthma. The discussion of particular AQLQ domains focused on sociodemographic variables (age, sex, education, professional activity, residence, and marital status) that may affect the HRQoL of patients with asthma. In the symptoms domain of the AQLQ, the one variable that adversely affected the HRQoL was the lack of professional activity. Disability pensioners had a significantly lower QoL in this domain than professionally active respondents. Similar results were obtained by Szynkiewicz et al13 in their study on the impact of sociodemographic factors on the HRQoL of patients with asthma. They confirmed that the professional status of respondents is a factor in their HRQoL. Analysis of factors influencing the activity limitation subscale of the AQLQ showed that HRQoL decreased as the age of respondents increased – as in the case of the symptoms subscale. Studies by other authors corroborate the present results.14–16 In the activity limitation subscale, older age was also a determinant of lower QoL scores. Most likely, the clinical presentation of asthma is also affected by aging processes in the respiratory system. Years of asthma may contribute to the development of irreversible obstructive disorders, making the condition similar to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Persistent obstructive disorders are commonly described in elderly patients with asthma. Lindner et al17 and Ouztürk et al18 reported that elderly patients with asthma had lower QoL, though proper treatment could improve the result in this patient group. This is corroborated by Hazell et al,19 reporting decreases in the QoL with increase in the age of patients. Another correlation was found between QoL in the activity limitation subscale and professional activity. Disability pensioners had a significantly lower QoL in this domain. As stated earlier, this is corroborated by Szynkiewicz et al.13 Studies performed by Laforest et al20 and Ferreira et al21 also reported that professional activity leads to a higher assessment of HRQoL among patients with bronchial asthma. However, in the study conducted by Hans-Wytrychowska et al,22 that correlation was not confirmed. Analysis of factors influencing the emotional function subscale of the AQLQ showed that QoL decreased as the age of respondents increased – as in the case of the symptoms and “activity limitation” subscales. With regard to professional activity, disability pensioners were characterized by a significantly lower QoL in this domain, which had been discussed and confirmed by other authors.23 The analysis of factors influencing the environmental stimuli subscale of the AQLQ showed that QoL decreased as the age of respondents increased – as in the case of the remaining subscales. Furthermore, a significantly decreased QoL in the environmental stimuli subscale was enjoyed by blue-collar workers than by white-collar workers. It can be concluded that patients with a higher education level have more knowledge and awareness about their illness, which results in better compliance with treatment. Chen et al24 have also proved that a low level of education results in lower QoL in patients with bronchial asthma. Similar findings were confirmed by the research done by Ferreira et al,21 indicating that QoL is better in patients with higher education and higher income. In addition, Blozik et al25 have proved that lower QoL was associated with lower education. A similar view was shared by Uchmanowicz et al,26 indicating that HRQoL is better in patients with higher education level. It can be concluded that patients with a higher education level have more knowledge and awareness about their illness, which results in better compliance with treatment.

Implications of the study

This study demonstrates that proper therapeutic interventions and patient education are the key to increase the QoL of patients. These factors enable the patients to adapt to their illness and may promote better compliance with treatment, contributing to better objective health.

Conclusion

Chronic disease lowers the QoL. Especially, asthma is a condition that significantly affects the HRQoL in various ways. The present study showed that age, physical work, and lack of professional activity decreased the QoL in this patient group. It was found that higher education contributes to better QoL scores.
  19 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting.

Authors:  I J Higginson; A J Carr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

2.  Health related quality of life in individuals with asthma related symptoms.

Authors:  Michelle Hazell; Timothy Frank; Peter Frank
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.415

3.  Psychological status and quality of life in elderly patients with asthma.

Authors:  Omer Oğuztürk; Aydanur Ekici; Murat Kara; Mehmet Ekici; Mesut Arslan; Ahmet Iteginli; Türkan Kara; Ercan Kurtipek
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

4.  Correlates of quality of life in patients with asthma.

Authors:  Laurent Laforest; Yves Pacheco; Pierre Bartsch; Walter Vincken; Guilhem Pietri; Pierre Ernst; Annick Bérard; Eric Van Ganse
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.347

5.  [Perception of asthma control in asthma patients].

Authors:  Eduardo Vieira Ponte; Jaqueline Petroni; Daniela Campos Borges Ramos; Luciana Pimentel; Daise Naiane Freitas; Alvaro A Cruz
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Quality of life in asthma patients.

Authors:  Lara Noronha Ferreira; Ulisses Brito; Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Port Pneumol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

7.  [Health-related quality of life in asthma patients from general practice].

Authors:  E Blozik; I Demmer; M M Kochen; J Koschack; W Niebling; W Himmel; M Scherer
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 0.628

8.  Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control.

Authors:  Robert A Nathan; Christine A Sorkness; Mark Kosinski; Michael Schatz; James T Li; Philip Marcus; John J Murray; Trudy B Pendergraft
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Health-related quality of life in Taiwanese patients with bronchial asthma.

Authors:  Kwua-Yun Wang; Chin-Pyng Wu; Yu-Ying Tang; Muh-Lan Yang
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Analysis of the impact of selected socio-demographic factors on quality of life of asthma patients.

Authors:  Ewa Szynkiewicz; Małgorzata Filanowicz; Małgorzata Graczyk; Bernadeta Cegła; Renata Jabłońska; Katarzyna Napiórkowska-Baran; Zbigniew Bartuzi
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  7 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life and associated factors in HIV-positive transplant candidates and recipients from a HIV-positive donor.

Authors:  Claire Juliet Martin; Elmi Muller; Demetre Labadarios; Frederick Johannes Veldman; Susanna Maria Kassier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Association between chronic conditions and health-related quality of life: differences by level of urbanization in Peru.

Authors:  Alvaro Taype-Rondan; Elizabeth Sarah Abbs; Maria Lazo-Porras; William Checkley; Robert H Gilman; Liam Smeeth; J Jaime Miranda; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Impact of asthma on women and men: Comparison with the general population using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

Authors:  Gimena Hernandez; Alexandra L Dima; Àngels Pont; Olatz Garin; Marc Martí-Pastor; Jordi Alonso; Eric Van Ganse; Laurent Laforest; Marijn de Bruin; Karina Mayoral; Montse Ferrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Levels of Physical Activity in Spanish Asthmatics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sheila Sánchez Castillo; Lee Smith; Arturo Díaz Suárez; Guillermo Felipe López Sánchez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Relationship between Multimorbidity and Quality of Life in a Primary Care Setting: The Mediating Role of Dyspnea.

Authors:  Pietro Alfano; Giuseppina Cuttitta; Palma Audino; Giovanni Fazio; Sabina La Grutta; Salvatore Marcantonio; Salvatore Bucchieri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Impact of Hospitalization on the Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sahbanathul Missiriya Jalal; Mini Rani Mary Beth; Zahra Mohammed Bo Khamseen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  An Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Asthma Through Physical, Emotional, Social, and Occupational Aspects. A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Zelal Kharaba; Emilie Feghali; Farah El Husseini; Hala Sacre; Carla Abou Selwan; Sylvia Saadeh; Souheil Hallit; Feras Jirjees; Hala AlObaidi; Pascale Salameh; Diana Malaeb
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.