| Literature DB >> 27051201 |
A Irshad1, B D Sharma2, S R Ahmed2, S Talukder2, O P Malav3, Ashish Kumar2.
Abstract
AIM: The present study was conducted to develop a functional meat product by fortifying calcium (in the form of calcium lactate) with restructured buffalo meat loaf (RBML).Entities:
Keywords: Lovibond® tintometer color units; buffalo meat; calcium fortification; meat loaves; restructured products; texture profile analysis and sensory attributes
Year: 2016 PMID: 27051201 PMCID: PMC4819365 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.151-159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Composition of spice mix for RBMLs.
| Ingredients | Percentage (w/w) |
|---|---|
| Coriander powder ( | 17 |
| Cumin seed ( | 10 |
| Aniseed ( | 10 |
| Black pepper ( | 10 |
| Caraway seed ( | 10 |
| Turmeric ( | 10 |
| Dried ginger ( | 10 |
| Capsicum ( | 8 |
| Cardamom ( | 5 |
| Cinnamon ( | 5 |
| Cloves ( | 3 |
| Nutmeg ( | 1 |
| Lace ( | 1 |
| Total | 100 |
RBMLs=Restructured buffalo meat loaves
Formulation of curing solution for RBMLs.
| Ingredients | Quantity (g) |
|---|---|
| Sodium chloride (2%) | 13.34 |
| Cane sugar (0.76%) | 5.07 |
| STPP (0.32%) | 2.13 |
| Sodium nitrite (90 ppm) | 0.06 |
Make the volume of each treatment to 100 ml with water. STTP=Sodium tripolyphosphate, RBMLs=Restructured buffalo meat loaves
Figure-1Flow chart of processing protocol for the development of restructured buffalo meat loaves.
Formulation of pre-standardized control RBMLs.
| Ingredients | Amount required for 100 g |
|---|---|
| Lean meat (g) | 77.0 |
| Curing solution (ml) | 15.0 |
| Refined wheat flour (g) | 3 |
| Spices (g) | 2.0 |
| Condiments (g) | 3.0 |
| Total | 100 |
Effect of calcium lactate incorporation on the physico-chemical properties of calcium fortified RBMLs.
| Parameters | Control | Level of calcium lactate incorporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 1.25% | 1.5% | ||
| Cooking yield (%) | 93.07±0.30a | 92.53±0.29a | 91.96±0.33a | 87.47±0.54b |
| Product pH | 6.22±0.01a | 6.10±0.01b | 6.07±0.01c | 5.90±0.02d |
| Moisture (%) | 68.75±0.08a | 68.23±0.11b | 67.79±0.15c | 65.99±0.46d |
| Protein (%) | 19.57±0.10a | 18.26±0.05c | 18.08±0.09c | 18.54±0.08b |
| Moisture protein ratio | 3.19±0.02c | 3.51±0.02b | 3.73±0.01a | 3.75±0.01a |
| Fat (%) | 3.09±0.04a | 2.77±0.03bc | 2.74±0.03c | 2.84±0.02b |
| Ash (%) | 2.93±0.05d | 3.11±0.03c | 3.27±0.03b | 3.42±0.02a |
| Calorific value (Kcal/100 g) | 132.61±0.80a | 130.97±0.52b | 129.46±0.75b | 127.99±0.82b |
| Shear force value (Kg/cm2) | 0.75±0.05a | 0.66±0.05ab | 0.68±0.05ab | 0.57±0.05b |
| Calcium concentration (mg/100 g) | 6.48±0.32d | 135.02±2.35c | 165.73±4.29b | 203.85±2.95a |
Mean±SE with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05), n1 (cooking yield and product pH)=3, n2 (proximate analysis)=6, n3 (shear force value)=30 for each treatment. SE=Standard error, RBMLs=Restructured buffalo meat loaves
Lovibond® tintometer color units and water activity of RBMLs.
| Parameters | Control | Level of calcium lactate incorporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 1.25% | 1.5% | ||
| Redness (a*) value | 8.28±0.05d | 9.57±0.13c | 10.97±0.24b | 11.68±0.09a |
| Yellowness (b*) value | 6.28±0.05c | 7.42±0.11b | 8.98±0.04a | 9.20±0.11a |
| Hue angle | 37.18±0.35b | 37.79±0.64ab | 39.36±0.70a | 38.21±0.19ab |
| Chroma | 10.40±0.30d | 12.11±0.10c | 14.18±0.16b | 14.87±0.14a |
| Water activity (aw) | 0.986±0.00a | 0.976±0.00b | 0.974±0.00c | 0.971±0.00d |
Mean±SE with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05), n=6 for each treatment. SE=Standard error, RBMLs=Restructured buffalo meat loaves
Instrumental TPA of RBMLs.
| Parameters | Control | Level of calcium lactate incorporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 1.25% | 1.5% | ||
| Hardness (N/cm2) | 46.62±1.07c | 51.28±0.53b | 55.04±1.30a | 56.06±1.51a |
| Adhesiveness (Ns) | −0.17±0.00c | −0.16±0.00bc | −0.15±0.01b | −0.13±0.01a |
| Springiness (cm) | 0.45±0.01 | 0.44±0.01 | 0.44±0.02 | 0.44±0.04 |
| Cohesiveness (ratio) | 0.31±0.01 | 0.26±0.05 | 0.31±0.01 | 0.281±0.01 |
| Gumminess (N/cm2) | 14.47±0.41 | 13.09±2.24 | 16.88±0.55 | 15.57±0.85 |
| Chewiness (N/cm) | 6.41±0.14 | 5.75±1.05 | 7.37±0.53 | 6.57±0.77 |
Mean±SE with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05), n=6 for each treatment. SE=Standard error, RBMLs=Restructured buffalo meat loaves, TPA=Texture profile analysis
Effect of calcium lactate incorporation on the sensory attributes of RBMLs.
| Sensory attributes | Control | Level of calcium lactate incorporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 1.25% | 1.5% | ||
| General appearance | 7.14±0.05a | 7.05±0.04a | 7.03±0.03a | 6.85±0.05b |
| Flavor | 7.10±0.06a | 6.97±0.07ab | 6.90±0.05b | 6.71±0.05c |
| Juiciness | 7.16±0.05a | 7.03±0.06a | 7.03±0.05a | 6.67±0.07b |
| Texture | 7.18±0.05a | 7.03±0.05a | 7.03±0.05a | 6.76±0.07b |
| Binding | 7.19±0.06a | 7.06±0.05ab | 7.10±0.03b | 6.78±0.06c |
| Saltiness | 7.12±0.05 | 7.00±0.05 | 7.02±0.04 | 6.98±0.06 |
| Overall acceptability | 7.16±0.06a | 7.02±0.05a | 7.01±0.05a | 6.72±0.07b |
Mean±SE with different superscripts in a row differ significantly (p<0.05), n=21 for each treatment. SE=Standard error, RBMLs=Restructured buffalo meat loaves
Figure-2Effect of calcium lactate incorporation on the sensory attributes of restructured buffalo meat loaves.