Literature DB >> 27051145

Assessment of burden among caregivers of hemodialysis patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Andhra Pradesh.

M Nagarathnam1, K Padma Reddy1, B Anuradha1, V Sivakumar2, S A A Latheef3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27051145      PMCID: PMC4795436          DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.172598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Nephrol        ISSN: 0971-4065


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, One hundred caregivers of hemodialysis patients, aged 20–65 years, attending a tertiary care hospital were evaluated for psychological burden using Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) instrument after obtaining their consent.[1] Caregivers, other than family members (relatives, friends, and children below 20 years) were excluded. The ZBI contains 22 items focusing on caregiver's health, psychological well-being, finances, social life, and the relationship between the caregiver and the patient.[2] In this study, five items (3, 11, 12, 14, and 17) with a corrected item-total correlation value of <0.3 were deleted. The total burden score was classified as little burden to no burden (0–20), mild to moderate burden (21–40), moderate to severe burden (41–60), and very severe burden (61–88). Most caregivers were young (53%), female (84%), homemakers (84%), married (86%), following the Hindu religion (85%), living in rural areas (42%), and in nuclear families (78%). A higher percentage of caregivers had a school education (28%), family income of Rs. 5000/month (68%), and were spouses of the patient (45%). The validity of the instrument was done by Cronbach's alpha and was found to be 0.7. The score ranged from 12 to 44 [Table 1]. A higher percentage of caregivers (85%) had reported mild to moderate burden. A higher mean burden score was observed in males than female caregivers (34.31 ± 3.30 vs. 30.42 ± 6.05, P < 0.05). Earlier studies had observed an association of burden score with age.[34] In a univariate regression analysis, statistically significant association between total burden score and male caregivers (standardized beta coefficient 0.244, P < 0.01) was observed. This indicates that more attention needs to be paid on male caregivers for reducing the burden among them.
Table 1

Mean scores and SD of individual items of burden score

Mean scores and SD of individual items of burden score No association was observed between burden score and duration of dialysis. This may due to the short duration of hemodialysis. The average duration of hemodialysis was 1 year. A high caregiver burden score is expected with an increased duration of disease. In our study, the majority of the caregivers were either spouses or parents and, therefore, it is possible that caregivers will not feel a burden in attending their immediate relative. This is confirmed by mild to moderate burden score in the majority of the caregivers. The dialysis patients were either government employees or beneficiaries of state government scheme NTR Vaidya Seva. Employees are reimbursed and those covered under the NTR Vaidya Seva scheme, avail the procedure free of cost. We feel that this may also be one of the reasons for not finding the association of burden score with duration of illness, as the caregivers need not be concerned about the financial resources. There is no consensus in literature on the association of caregiver burden score and duration of disease. One study had not found any association[4] while other found decreased burden score with an increase in the duration of disease.[5] This is only a pilot study. Studies on the caregivers of longer duration dialysis patients may clarify on the association between caregiver burden and duration of disease, which we intended to carry out.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

1.  Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden.

Authors:  S H Zarit; K E Reever; J Bach-Peterson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1980-12

2.  Burden on caregivers as perceived by hemodialysis patients in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) trials.

Authors:  Rita S Suri; Brett Larive; Amit X Garg; Yoshio N Hall; Andreas Pierratos; Glenn M Chertow; Irina Gorodetskeya; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Validity and reliability of the Zarit Burden Interview in assessing caregiving burden.

Authors:  Boon Kheng Seng; Nan Luo; Wai Yee Ng; June Lim; Hui Ling Chionh; Jenny Goh; Philip Yap
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.473

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Assessing burden and its determinants in caregivers of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Authors:  Shijo John Joseph; Samrat Singh Bhandari; Sanjiba Dutta; Dheeraj Khatri; Apoorva Upadhyay
Journal:  Open J Psychiatry Allied Sci       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  Factors Influencing Scales of Burden, Coping Mechanisms, and Quality of Life in Caregivers of Hemodialysis Patients in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Authors:  M Nagarathnam; S A A Latheef; V Sivakumar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Burden, coping mechanisms, and quality of life among caregivers of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis undergoing and renal transplant patients.

Authors:  M Nagarathnam; Vishnubotla Sivakumar; S A A Latheef
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Caregiver Burden among Caregivers of Patient Undergoing Hemodialysis in Tertiary Care Center : A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Srijana Khatri Chhetri; Rojina Baral
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.406

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.