| Literature DB >> 27050817 |
Juliana Infante1, Pedro Luiz Rosalen2, Josy Goldoni Lazarini2, Marcelo Franchin2, Severino Matias de Alencar1.
Abstract
Brazilian native fruits are unmatched in their variety, but a poorly explored resource for the development of food and pharmaceutical products. The aim of this study was to evaluate the phenolic composition as well as the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of the extracts of leaves, seeds, and pulp of four Brazilian native fruits (Eugenia leitonii, Eugenia involucrata, Eugenia brasiliensis, and Eugenia myrcianthes). GC-MS analyses of the ethanolic extracts showed the presence of epicatechin and gallic acid as the major compounds in these fruits. Antioxidant activity was measured using synthetic DPPH free-radical scavenging, β-carotene bleaching assay, and reactive oxygen species (ROO·, O2·-, and HOCl). The fruit extracts also exhibited antioxidant effect against biologically relevant radicals such as peroxyl, superoxide, and hypochlorous acid. In general, the pulps were the fruit fractions that exhibited the lowest antioxidant activities, whereas the leaves showed the highest ones. The anti-inflammatory activity was assessed in an in vivo model using the carrageenan-induced neutrophil migration assay, which evaluates the inflammatory response in the acute phase. The pulp, seeds, and leaves of these fruits reduced the neutrophil influx by 40% to 64%. Based on these results, we suggest that the anti-inflammatory activity of these native fruits is related to the modulation of neutrophil migration, through the inhibition of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, as well as to the antioxidant action of their ethanolic extracts in scavenging the free-radicals released by neutrophils. Therefore, these native fruits can be useful to produce food additives and functional foods.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27050817 PMCID: PMC4822956 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Content of total phenolic compounds in the ethanolic extracts of leaves, seeds, and pulp of four Brazilian native fruit species.
| Species | Equivalent mg gallic acid/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Seeds | Pulp | |
| 88.62 ± 2.43bB | 120.67 ± 4.38aA | 15.18 ± 0.79dC | |
| 70.19 ± 1.88aC | 22.75 ± 0.50bC | 18.36 ± 0.66cB | |
| 73.25 ± 3.41aC | 42.60 ± 1.90bB | 26.69 ± 1.22cA | |
| 100.29 ± 3.29aA | 11.34 ± 0.49cD | 17.80 ± 0.89bB | |
* Means of triplicates.Different lower case letters in the same line and upper case letters in the same column differ statistically by the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Fig 1GC/MS chromatograms of extracts of leaves, seeds, and pulp of four Brazilian native fruit species and standards of phenolic compounds.
(1) m-coumaric acid, (2) p-coumaric acid, (3) gallic acid, (4) sinapic acid, (5) (-)-epicatechin, (6) quercetin.
Phenolic composition of the ethanolic extracts of leaves, seeds, and pulp of four Brazilian native fruit species determined by GC-MS.
| Phenolic compound | Area of the component (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Seeds | Pulp | Leaves | Seeds | Pulp | Leaves | Seeds | Pulp | Leaves | Seeds | Pulp | |
| Cinnamic acid | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.43 | – | – | – |
| Protocatechuic acid | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | 0.26 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | 0.06 | – | – | 0.83 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Gallic acid | 69.4 | 45.56 | 9.02 | – | 42.42 | 24.55 | 4.67 | 33.89 | 6.68 | 13.36 | 12.04 | 51.31 |
| Sinapic acid | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.03 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin β-D-glucopyranoside | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.67 | – | – | – |
| (–)-epicatechin | 7.1 | 26.58 | 29.38 | 49.43 | 33.52 | - | 0.76 | 14.23 | – | 31.25 | 63.36 | 39.01 |
| Kaempferol | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Quercetin | – | – | 0.12 | – | – | – | 4.05 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Myricetin | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15.31 | – | – | – | – | – |
*–non-detected
Antioxidant activity of the ethanolic extracts of leaves, seeds, and pulp of four Brazilian native fruit species measured using synthetic DPPH free-radical scavenging, β-carotene bleaching, and reactive oxygen species (ROO·, O2·−, and HOCl) assays.
| Sample | DPPH (EC50, μg/mL) | β -carotene bleaching (μmol Trolox/g) | ORAC (μmol TE/g) | Superoxide anion (EC50, mg/mL) | Hypochlorous acid (EC50, μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | 140.33 ± 3.7i | 5.42 ± 0.4b | 757.32 ± 34.7b | 0.40 ± 0.00e | 45.81 ± 0.53g |
| Seeds | 196.55 ± 3.9h | 3.89 ± 0.1cd | 211.84 ± 9.3g | 0.59 ± 0.02e | 136.10 ± 8.82c |
| Pulp | 472.37 ± 3.2e | 4.24 ± 0.1cd | 477.45 ± 23,3ed | 2.15 ± 0.15c | 42.67 ± 2.10g |
| Leaves | 191.50 ± 0.3h | 7.18 ± 0.6a | 1,393.3 ± 69.6a | – | 13.84 ± 0.66j |
| Seeds | 346.70 ± 14.1f | 3.38 ± 0.3de | 168.66 ± 4.9gh | 1.11 ± 0.04d | 152.57 ± 4.45b |
| Pulp | 988.52 ± 22.4a | 4.56 ± 0.1bc | 321.74 ± 9.8f | – | 58.31 ± 4.34f |
| Leaves | 83.80 ± 3.0jk | 5.27 ± 0.3b | 644.31 ± 25.4c | 0.37 ± 0.02e | 39.95 ± 0.83gh |
| Seeds | 734.51 ± 21.2c | 1.13 ± 0.0f | 96.24 ± 4.7h | 6.28 ± 0.33a | 209.49 ± 6.84a |
| Pulp | 597.51 ± 9.5d | 1.59 ± 0.1f | 127.62 ± 5.8h | 4.02 ± 0.33b | 136.25 ± 5.58c |
| Leaves | 112.38 ± 1.8ji | 3.01 ± 0.5e | 417.71 ± 16.7e | 0.48 ± 0.00e | 29.55 ± 1.86hi |
| Seeds | 69.55 ± 1.7k | 7.07 ± 0.5a | 514.76 ± 21.5d | 0.26 ± 0.01e | 18.14 ± 0.70ij |
| Pulp | 792.43 ± 8.4b | 0.74 ± 0.0f | 102.82 ± 7.8h | 2.67 ± 0.33c | 109.92 ± 1.63d |
* Letters compare values in the same column by the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Fig 2Effect of the oral administration of ethanolic extracts of leaves, seeds, and pulp of four Brazilian native fruit species on the inhibition of neutrophil migration to the peritoneal cavity of mice treated with 500 mg/kg.
(A) Eugenia brasiliensis. (B) Eugenia involucrata. (C) Eugenia leitonii. (D) Eugenia myrcianthes. C: control treated with vehicle; –: carrageenan (500 μg/cavity); Dexa: dexamethasone (2 mg/kg). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the mean; n = 6. Symbols indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test): # p < 0.05 compared with the control group; * p < 0.05 compared with the carrageenan group. The symbol % indicates decrease in the number of neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity.