| Literature DB >> 27050400 |
Hua Zhang1,2, Deborah C Merrett1,2, Zhichun Jing3, Jigen Tang4, Yuling He4, Hongbin Yue4, Zhanwei Yue4, Dongya Y Yang1,2.
Abstract
Through the analysis of human skeletal remains and mortuary practice in Yinxu, this study investigates the impact of early urbanization on the commoners during the Late Shang dynasty (ca. 1250-1046 B.C.). A total of 347 individuals examined in this study represent non-elites who were recovered from two different burial contexts (formally buried in lineage cemeteries and randomly scattered in refuse pits). Frequencies of enamel hypoplasia (childhood stress), cribra orbitalia (childhood stress and frailty) and osteoperiostitis (adult stress) were examined to assess systemic stress exposure. Our results reveal that there was no significant difference in the frequency of enamel hypoplasia between two burial groups and between sexes, suggesting these urban commoners experienced similar stresses during childhood, but significantly elevated levels of cribra orbitalia and osteoperiostitis were observed in the refuse pit female cohort. Theoretically, urbanization would have resulted in increased population density in the urban centre, declining sanitary conditions, and increased risk of resource shortage. Biologically, children would be more vulnerable to such physiological disturbance; as a result, high percentages of enamel hypoplasia (80.9% overall) and cribra orbitalia (30.3% overall) are observed in Yin commoners. Adults continued to suffer from stress, resulting in high frequencies of osteoperiostitis (40.0% total adults); in particular, in the refuse pit females who may also reflect a compound impact of gender inequality. Our data show that the non-elite urban population in the capital city of Late Shang Dynasty had experienced extensive stress exposure due to early urbanization with further social stratification only worsening the situation, and eventually contributing to collapse of the Shang Dynasty.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27050400 PMCID: PMC4822842 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of Yin and the locations of the sites: (1) Xin’anzhuang, (2) Xiaomintun, (3) Heihelu, (4) Liujiazhuang North, and (5) Huayuanzhuang East.
Skeletal samples used in this study (see S1 Table for detailed specimen numbers).
| Site | Sample Size | Phase | Burial type | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early phase | Late phase | Lineage burials | Refuse pits | ||
| Xin’anzhuang | 178 | 38 | 48 | 162 | 16 |
| Heihelu | 44 | 16 | 24 | 42 | 2 |
| Xiaomintun [ | 87 | 1 | 54 | 76 | 11 |
| Liujiazhuang North [ | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33 |
| Huayuanzhuang East [ | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 347 | 55 | 130 | 285 | 62 |
* The excavation of Xin’anzhuang site was led by the present study co-author Zhanwei Yue.
** The excavation of Heihelu site was led by the present study co-author Jigen Tang.
*, ** Site reports are not yet published.
Age groups defined in this study.
| Age group | Age range (Years) |
|---|---|
| 1 | Perinatal– 3 |
| 2 | 4–12 |
| 3 | 13–19 |
| 4 | 20–34 |
| 5 | 35–49 |
| 6 | 50 + |
Fig 2Linear enamel hypoplasia on the labial surface of right anterior maxillary dentition of 2003AXN192.
Scale bar = 1cm.
Fig 3Cribra orbitalia on the right orbit of 2007AXAM30.
Scale bar = 1cm.
Fig 4Osteoperiostitis on medial surface of right tibial shaft of 2007AXAM101.
Scale bar = 2cm.
Fig 5Age-at-death and sex distribution of the total sample.
* * P = Perinatal.
Age-at-death distribution of skeletons by sex and time period.*
| Subadults | Adults | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group 1 (P– 3) | Age group 2 (4–12) | Age group 3 (13–19) | Age group 4 (20–34) | Age group 5 (35–49) | Age group 6 (50+) | Adults of indeterminate age (20+) | ||||||||||
| M | F | I | M | F | I | M | F | I | M | F | I | |||||
| Early phase | 0 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 55 |
| Late phase | 0 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 21 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 130 |
* P = Perinatal; M = Male; F = Female; I = Adults of indeterminate sex.
Age-at-death distribution of skeletons by sex and burial type.*
| Subadults | Adults | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group 1 (P– 3) | Age group 2 (4–12) | Age group 3 (13–19) | Age group 4 (20–34) | Age group 5 (35–49) | Age group 6 (50+) | Adults of indeterminate age (20+) | ||||||||||
| M | F | I | M | F | I | M | F | I | M | F | I | |||||
| Lineage burials | 2 | 19 | 33 | 41 | 51 | 11 | 38 | 36 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 285 |
| Refuse pits | 0 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 62 |
* P = Perinatal; M = Male; F = Female; I = Adults of indeterminate sex.
Crude prevalence data of systemic stress indicators by sex, temporal phase and burial type.*
| Enamel Hypoplasia | Osteoperiostitis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |||
| Total | 230 | 80.9 | 165 | 30.3 | — | — | ||
| Subadults | 52 | 80.8 | 23 | 52.2 | — | — | ||
| Adults | Adults Total | 178 | 80.9 | 142 | 26.8 | 180 | 40.0 | |
| M | 78 | 84.6 | 61 | 26.2 | 78 | 46.2 | ||
| F | 80 | 80.0 | 69 | 27.5 | 83 | 36.1 | ||
| Time Period | Early phase | M | 12 | 83.3 | 6 | 33.3 | 12 | 33.3 |
| F | 10 | 60.0 | 8 | 37.5 | 16 | 31.3 | ||
| Total | 31 | 80.6 | 22 | 31.8 | 35 | 34.3 | ||
| Late phase | M | 35 | 85.7 | 26 | 38.5 | 28 | 42.9 | |
| F | 32 | 78.1 | 27 | 25.9 | 25 | 24.0 | ||
| Total | 92 | 81.5 | 65 | 33.8 | 57 | 31.6 | ||
| Burial type | Lineage burials | M | 67 | 85.1 | 50 | 30.0 | 63 | 46.0 |
| F | 70 | 80.0 | 56 | 21.4 | 70 | 30.0 | ||
| Total | 196 | 81.1 | 129 | 27.9 | 150 | 36.7 | ||
| Refuse pits | M | 11 | 81.8 | 11 | 9.1 | 15 | 46.7 | |
| F | 10 | 80.0 | 13 | 53.8 | 13 | 69.2 | ||
| Total | 34 | 79.4 | 36 | 38.9 | 29 | 58.6 | ||
*—Observations in adults only; N = total number of individuals observed; M = Male; F = Female.
Interpretation of odds ratio statistics for the overall comparison of systemic stress by sex, phase, and burial type.*
| Pathological condition | Interpretation of odds ratio results | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male (M) vs. Female (F) | Early phase (E) vs. Late phase (L) | Lineage burials (B) vs. Refuse pits (R) | |
| Enamel Hypoplasia | 1.45 times M > F | 1.19 times L > E | 1.26 times B > R |
| 1.06 times F > M | 1.59 times L > E | 1.71 times R > B | |
| Osteoperiostitis | 1.61 times M > F | 1.02 times L > E | |
* The difference is statistically significant (χ2MH = 3.578, df = 1, P = 0.039).
Fig 6Crude prevalence comparisons of systemic stress indicators by sex and by temporal phase.
Interpretation of odds ratio results for the comparison of systemic stress by sex and by phase.
| Pathological condition | Interpretation of odds ratio results | |
|---|---|---|
| Within-phase comparisons | Between-phase comparisons | |
| Male (M) vs. Female (F) | Early phase (E) vs. Late phase (L) | |
| Early phase | Males | |
| Enamel Hypoplasia | 3.21 times M > F | 1.15 times L > E |
| 3.33 times M > F | 1.11 times L > E | |
| Osteoperiostitis | 1.53 times M > F | 1.26 times L > E |
| Late phase | Females | |
| Enamel Hypoplasia | 1.92 times M > F | 4.29 times L > E |
| 1.67 times M > F | 1.20 times E > L | |
| Osteoperiostitis | 2.59 times M > F | 1.49 times E > L |
Fig 7Crude prevalence comparisons of systemic stress indicators by sex and burial type.
Interpretation of odds ratio results for the comparison of systemic stress by sex and by burial type.
| Pathological condition | Interpretation of odds ratio results | |
|---|---|---|
| Within-burial comparisons | Between-burial type comparisons | |
| Male (M) vs. Female (F) | Lineage burials (B) vs. Refuse pits (R) | |
| Lineage burials | Males | |
| Enamel Hypoplasia | 1.56 times M > F | 2.30 times B > R |
| 1.55 times M > F | 3.53 times B > R | |
| Osteoperiostitis | 1.06 times B > R | |
| Refuse pits | Females | |
| Enamel Hypoplasia | 1.10 times M > F | 1.04 times B > R |
| 10.00 times F > M | ||
| Osteoperiostitis | 4.03 times F > M | |
* The difference is statistically significant (χ2MH = 4.093, df = 1, P = 0.028).
** The difference is statistically significant (χ2MH = 6.380, df = 1, P = 0.007).
*** The difference is statistically significant (χ2MH = 7.249, df = 1, P = 0.006).