Julien Al Shakarchi1, Danielle Lowry2, Jay Nath3, Aurangzaib Z Khawaja3, Nicholas Inston3, Alok Tiwari2. 1. Department of Renal Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.alshakarchi@nhs.net. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Renal Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: After carotid endarterectomy (CEA), patients have been regularly followed up by duplex ultrasound imaging. However, the evidence for long-term follow-up is not clear, especially if the results from an early duplex scan are normal. This study assessed and systematically reviewed the evidence base for long-term surveillance after CEA and a normal early scan. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing duplex surveillance after CEA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome for this study was the incidence of restenosis after a normal early scan. The secondary outcome was the number of reinterventions after a normal early scan. RESULTS: The review included seven studies that reported 2317 procedures. Of those patients with a normal early scan, 2.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-6%) developed a restenosis, and 0.4% (95% confidence interval, 0%-0.9%) underwent a reintervention for their restenosis during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms that routine postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance after CEA is not necessary if the early duplex scan is normal.
OBJECTIVE: After carotid endarterectomy (CEA), patients have been regularly followed up by duplex ultrasound imaging. However, the evidence for long-term follow-up is not clear, especially if the results from an early duplex scan are normal. This study assessed and systematically reviewed the evidence base for long-term surveillance after CEA and a normal early scan. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing duplex surveillance after CEA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome for this study was the incidence of restenosis after a normal early scan. The secondary outcome was the number of reinterventions after a normal early scan. RESULTS: The review included seven studies that reported 2317 procedures. Of those patients with a normal early scan, 2.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-6%) developed a restenosis, and 0.4% (95% confidence interval, 0%-0.9%) underwent a reintervention for their restenosis during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms that routine postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance after CEA is not necessary if the early duplex scan is normal.
Authors: Guan Z Chen; Yuan Z Wu; Peng Y Diao; Li Ma; Sheng Yan; Xin Y Chen; Wei C Liu; Hong Y Zheng; Bao Liu; Jun Y Li Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2018-08-21