Literature DB >> 27050098

High oblique sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: assessment of the positions of the mandibular condyles after orthognathic surgery based on cone-beam tomography.

R Kuehle1, M Berger1, D Saure2, J Hoffmann1, R Seeberger3.   

Abstract

High oblique sagittal split osteotomy is an orthognathic technique to move the mandible. Our aim was to evaluate changes in the position of the condyle in the glenoid fossa and its angulation before and after high oblique sagittal split osteotomy (HSSO). Fifty patients (32 women and 18 men, mean age 26.3 (SD 7.4) years) had cone-beam computed tomographyic (CT) scans before operation, immediately postoperatively, and before removal of the osteosynthesis nine months postoperatively. The images were analysed to look for changes in the sagittal, coronal, and axial positions of the condyles. Twenty-four patients with class II malocclusion had a mean (SD) mandibular advancement of 6.51 (2.41) mm, and 26 patients with class III malocclusion had a mean (SD) mandibular setback of 4.16 (2.77) mm. The joint space increased significantly (p<0.05) relative to baseline immediately postoperatively, but there was no significant increase at the nine-month follow-up. The changes in position in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes were comparable. Despite there being a short proximal joint-bearing segment, the results indicate that this technique allows free-hand condylar positioning into the fossa safely without any clinically relevant dislocations.
Copyright © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; Cranio-mandibular-joint; Mandibular condyle position; Orthognathic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27050098     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of condylar changes in surgical correction for open bite patients with skeletal class II and class III malocclusions.

Authors:  J T Zupnik; M Ioshida; M Yatabe; A C O Ruellas; L R Gomes; S Aronovich; E Benavides; S P Edwards; B Paniagua; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Comparison of two surgical techniques (HOO vs. BSSO) for mandibular osteotomies in orthognathic surgery-a 10-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Lukas B Seifert; Christopher Langhans; Yakub Berdan; Sophie Zorn; Michelle Klos; Constantin Landes; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Laboratorial Comparative Study of the Accuracy Between Virtual Planning and Erickson's Platform.

Authors:  Maysa Nogueira de Barros Melo; Ítalo Miranda do Vale Pereira; Alexander Tadeu Sverzut; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-01-17

4.  Changes of temporomandibular joint position after surgery first orthognathic treatment concept.

Authors:  Daniel Holzinger; Katrin Willinger; Gabriele Millesi; Kurt Schicho; Elisabeth Breuss; Florian Wagner; Rudolf Seemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Biomechanical assessment of different fixation methods in mandibular high sagittal oblique osteotomy using a three-dimensional finite element analysis model.

Authors:  Charles Savoldelli; Elodie Ehrmann; Yannick Tillier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Short-term and long-term alterations of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback: A preliminary before-after clinical trial.

Authors:  Farhad Sobouti; Hoora Hadian; Amir Hosein Pakravan; Zahra Rahimi; Vahid Rakhshan; Sepideh Dadgar
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Revision of 116 orthognathic surgery patients operated on with the high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): a retrospective case series (PROCESS-compliant article).

Authors:  C Herrera-Vizcaino; L Seifert; M Berdan; S Ghanaati; M Klos; C Landes; Robert Sader
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.