Literature DB >> 27049188

Emerging Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Ekaterina Urch1, Joshua S Dines, David M Dines.   

Abstract

Historically, reverse shoulder arthroplasty was reserved for older, low-demand patients in whom rotator cuff arthropathy was diagnosed. Other common indications included sequelae of previously treated proximal humerus fractures, failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, tumor resection, and rheumatoid arthritis in the elderly population. Unpredictable implant durability and high complication rates have limited the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to a narrow group of patients. Over the past decade, however, research has led to an improved understanding of the biomechanics behind reverse shoulder prostheses, which has improved implant design and surgical techniques. Consequently, orthopaedic surgeons have slowly begun to expand the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty to include a wider spectrum of shoulder pathologies. Recent studies have shown promising results for patients who undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute proximal humerus fractures, massive rotator cuff tears without arthropathy, primary osteoarthritis, and chronic anterior dislocation, as well as for younger patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. These data suggest that, with judicious patient selection, reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be an excellent treatment option for a growing patient cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27049188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed megaprosthesis for osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  V Singh Chauhan; Abhishek Vaish; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-03-22

2.  Prospective multicentre mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 159 reverse total shoulder replacements and assessment of the influence of post-operative complications.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Jörg Neumann; Werner Siebert; Sabine Mai; Olivier Verborgt; Franziska Eckers; Leo Jacobs; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-12-20

3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up.

Authors:  Sebastien Zilber; Eleonora Camana; Peter Lapner; Emil Haritinian; Laurent Nove Josserand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mid-term shoulder functional and quality of life outcomes after shoulder replacement in obese patients.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Aimee M Struk; Austin Reed; Thomas W Wright
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-08

5.  Patient-reported outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative risk factor analysis of improved versus unimproved cases.

Authors:  Moby Parsons; Howard D Routman; Christopher P Roche; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Early outcomes and complications of obese patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Klein; Julio J Jauregui; Edward Raff; R Frank Henn; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit Gilotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09-03

7.  Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in infected shoulder arthroplasty caused by Serratia marcescens: a case report.

Authors:  Sungjoon Lim; Jun-Bum Lee; Myoung Yeol Shin; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2022-01-04

8.  Does Having a Rotator Cuff Repair Before Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence Outcomes?

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Daphne Ling; Alexandra Wong; Joshua S Dines; David M Dines; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.