Literature DB >> 27048664

Analysis of Outcome Domains in Adult Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review.

Peter M Vila1, Timothy E Hullar2, Craig A Buchman3, Judith E C Lieu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the breadth of outcome domains used in the reporting of adult cochlear implant surgery for the purpose of registry and quality measure development. DATA SOURCES: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. REVIEW
METHODS: In consultation with a medical librarian, search strategies were constructed to identify randomized controlled trials studying adults undergoing cochlear implantation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched from database inception to July 2015. Studies were evaluated for level of evidence and risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool, and outcome domains were extracted from each study.
RESULTS: Of 4473 unique citations found, 8 studies were included in this review. All 8 trials were evidence level 1B. Risk of bias was low in 2 trials and high in the other 6. Reported outcome domains included speech perception in quiet and noise, speech tracking, quality of life, timbre perception, hearing preservation, vestibular function, electrode insertion technique, functional measures, functional imaging, fitting time, and tinnitus.
CONCLUSIONS: An analysis of randomized controlled trials studying cochlear implantation in adults yielded a wide spectrum of outcome domains. This is the first study to comprehensively describe the breadth of outcome domains in adult cochlear implantation. Validated instruments from these domains could be considered for potential inclusion as quality measures and registry use. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; deafness; hearing loss; outcome assessment; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048664      PMCID: PMC6422673          DOI: 10.1177/0194599816641382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  3 in total

1.  Are Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients Consistent Across Different Tests?

Authors:  Nicholas S Andresen; Varun Vohra; Deepa J Galaiya; Courtney L Carver; Dawn D Marsiglia; Jennifer D Yeagle; Francis X Creighton; Nae-Yuh Wang; Stephen P Bowditch; Charles C Della Santina; Daniel Q Sun
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Ancestral Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Delivery of Opsins to Spiral Ganglion Neurons: Implications for Optogenetic Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Maria J Duarte; Vivek V Kanumuri; Lukas D Landegger; Osama Tarabichi; Sumi Sinha; Xiankai Meng; Ariel Edward Hight; Elliott D Kozin; Konstantina M Stankovic; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Developing Quality Measures for Adult Cochlear Implant Centers: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Peter M Vila; Judith E C Lieu; Timothy E Hullar; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.591

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.