Literature DB >> 27048638

Establishing the Aus-ROC Australian and New Zealand out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Epistry.

Ben Beck1, Janet Bray2, Karen Smith3, Tony Walker4, Hugh Grantham5, Cindy Hein5, Melanie Thorrowgood6, Anthony Smith7, Tony Smith8, Bridget Dicker9, Andy Swain10, Mark Bailey10, Emma Bosley11, Katherine Pemberton12, Peter Cameron13, Graham Nichol14, Judith Finn15.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health problem with low survival. Regional variation in survival has heightened interest in combining cardiac arrest registries to understand and improve OHCA outcomes. While individual OHCA registries exist in Australian and New Zealand ambulance services, until recently these registries have not been combined. The aim of this protocol paper is to describe the rationale and methods of the Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) OHCA epidemiological registry (Epistry). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Aus-ROC Epistry is designed as a population-based cohort study. Data collection started in 2014. Six ambulance services in Australia (Ambulance Victoria, SA Ambulance Service, St John Ambulance Western Australia and Queensland Ambulance Service) and New Zealand (St John New Zealand and Wellington Free Ambulance) currently contribute data. All OHCA attended by ambulance, regardless of aetiology or patient age, are included in the Epistry. The catchment population is approximately 19.3 million persons, representing 63% of the Australian population and 100% of the New Zealand population. Data are collected using Utstein-style definitions. Information incorporated into the Epistry includes demographics, arrest features, ambulance response times, treatment and patient outcomes. The primary outcome is 'survival to hospital discharge', with 'return of spontaneous circulation' as a key secondary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was independently sought by each of the contributing registries. Overarching ethics for the Epistry was provided by Monash University HREC (Approval No. CF12/3938-2012001888). A population-based OHCA registry capturing the majority of Australia and New Zealand will allow risk-adjusted outcomes to be determined, to enable benchmarking across ambulance providers, facilitate the identification of system-wide strategies associated with survival from OHCA, and allow monitoring of temporal trends in process and outcomes to improve patient care. Findings will be shared with participating ambulance services and the academic community. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Emergency Medical Service; Registry; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048638      PMCID: PMC4823452          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) epidemiological registry (Epistry) is a population-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registry with a capture region encompassing the majority of Australia and all of New Zealand. The Epistry provides an ability to define consistent primary and secondary outcome measures to compare the effects of regional and ambulance service variations and understand factors associated with improved survival from OHCA. Combining data from multiple regions has inherent challenges, including variation in the variables collected by each of the participating ambulance services.

Introduction

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health problem.1 Despite over 50 years since the advent of cardiopulmonary resuscitation,2 survival remains low with reported rates between 0.6% and 25%.3 Recognition of the variation in OHCA survival rates between regions has heightened interest in the development of multicentre cardiac arrest registries to understand and improve OHCA outcomes. Individual OHCA registries have been established by ambulance services in most Australian states and across the whole of New Zealand. However, until recently, combining these registries has been hindered by a lack of infrastructure to host the data and to ensure a consensus of definitions and standardisation. As illustrated by the success of international groups, such as the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC),4 the combining of registries across a larger region facilitates: the understanding of regional differences in the OHCA incidence and outcomes; the influence of different ambulance service structures; and the patient, ambulance service and period factors associated with survival.5–7

Aims and objectives of the project

The Australian ROC (Aus-ROC)8 was established as a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHRMC) Centre of Research Excellence in 2011 to increase research capacity aimed at improving OHCA survival and outcomes. One of the major objectives of this consortium was to develop an Australian and New Zealand cardiac arrest epidemiological registry (Epistry) to enhance and inform coordinated OHCA outcomes, research and evaluation. This paper describes the rationale and methods of the Aus-ROC Epistry.

Methods

Study design

The Aus-ROC Epistry is designed as a population-based cohort study. Data collection started in 2014. Six established cardiac arrest registries, four in Australia and two in New Zealand, contribute data to the Epistry (figure 1). All six cardiac arrest registries are maintained by ambulance services: Ambulance Victoria, SA Ambulance Service, St John Ambulance Western Australia, Queensland Ambulance Service, St John New Zealand and Wellington Free Ambulance. Approximately 19.3 million persons are served by these ambulance services (table 1); thus, the Epistry represents approximately 63% of the Australian population (total population of 23.5 million9) and 100% of the New Zealand population (total population of 4.5 million).10
Figure 1

Map of Aus-ROC Epistry highlighting the captured regions in Australia and New Zealand (shown in colour).

Table 1

Description of the six participating Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) regions

RegionAmbulance serviceService area populationGeographic area (ha)
South Australia, AustraliaSA Ambulance Service1 685 714998 417 96611
Victoria, AustraliaAmbulance Victoria5 841 667922 749 55212
Western Australia, AustraliaSt John Ambulance Western Australia2 573 3899252 641 78613
Queensland, AustraliaQueensland Ambulance Service4 722 4479172 582 59314
Australian Registries14 823 217121 809 304
New Zealand (excluding Wellington)St John New Zealand4 018 3701026 152 19515
Wellington, New ZealandWellington Free Ambulance491 38010813 00516
New Zealand Registries4 509 75026 965 200
Total19 332 967573 357 097

Australia population=23 490 736, Australia geographic area=758 848 540.5 ha,12 New Zealand population=4 509 750,10 New Zealand geographic area=26 965 200 ha.15

Description of the six participating Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) regions Australia population=23 490 736, Australia geographic area=758 848 540.5 ha,12 New Zealand population=4 509 750,10 New Zealand geographic area=26 965 200 ha.15 Map of Aus-ROC Epistry highlighting the captured regions in Australia and New Zealand (shown in colour). Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of each of the regions in Australia and New Zealand are shown in online supplementary appendices 2 and 3, respectively.17–19 Australian regions participating in the Epistry demonstrated similar characteristics to those of the broader Australian population. While some regions not currently participating in the Epistry demonstrated variations in the proportion of the population who were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island peoples and those living in ‘major cities’, these regions (Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory and Tasmania) had small total populations that reflected a combined 4.9% of the Australian population. Differences in the classification of geographical regions did not facilitate comparisons between Australia and New Zealand. Alternate metrics may be required when making comparisons of rurality between the two countries.

Inclusion criteria

All OHCA attended by ambulance, regardless of aetiology, are included in the Epistry. All deaths attended by ambulance are classified as OHCA and thus included in the Epistry.

Data capture

Capture of OHCA cases varies between ambulance services. A combination of electronic queries of patient care records (PCRs), manual sorting through PCRs, staff standardised reporting and dispatch codes are used to identify OHCA cases. For those ambulance services that use electronic queries, subsequent manual searches are conducted by all services to maximise case capture. Hospital outcomes data are commonly obtained through linkage with hospital records and state-based death registries. In one region, hospital outcomes are obtained through linkage with the state Department of Health data.

Variables

Data across all participating sites are collected in accordance with Utstein-style definitions,20 although some variation in the coding of these items exists. Recoding of each variable is conducted to ensure uniformity in the variables collected. Data include information on the OHCA event, demographics, arrest features, response times, treatment and outcome. Variables were identified by consensus among representatives from participating ambulance services (table 2). All variables are collected by each of the six participating ambulance services.
Table 2

Mandatory variables included in the Aus-ROC Epistry

GroupVariable
Case overviewUnique Aus-ROC case identifier
Event date
Longitude coordinate of event
Latitude coordinate of event
DemographicsAge
Age qualifier
Sex
Location of arrest
Arrest featuresWitnessed arrest
Bystander CPR
First arresting rhythm
Aetiology of arrest
Dates and timesDate and time call received
Date and time arrive at scene (first)
Date and time depart scene (transporting ambulance)
Date and time arrive hospital (transporting ambulance)
TreatmentAmbulance service resuscitation attempt
Ambulance service defibrillation
Defibrillation before ambulance service
Total number of shocks
Airway (final)
Mechanical CPR
OutcomesAny ROSC
Scene outcome
Survived event (ROSC on hospital handover)
Died
Discharged alive
Date of discharge/death
Discharge disposition
Receiving hospital (PCI capability)

Aus-ROC, Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium; Epistry, epidemiological registry; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

Mandatory variables included in the Aus-ROC Epistry Aus-ROC, Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium; Epistry, epidemiological registry; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation. The primary outcome measure is ‘survival to hospital discharge’, with ‘return of spontaneous circulation’ as a key secondary outcome. These measures are considered ‘core’ outcomes according to the Utstein template.20 While neurological outcome and long-term quality of life measurements are important patient-centred outcomes, they are not presently collected across all sites, and thus these measures are not currently included in the Epistry.

Ethical considerations

Ethics approval was independently sought by each of the contributing registries. Overarching ethics for the Epistry was provided by Monash University HREC (Approval No. CF12/3938—2012001888). Data from each of the contributing registries will be provided in reidentifiable form with a unique identifier should the need arise to cross-check individual cases.

Data management and governance

The Epistry is coordinated and located at the Aus-ROC administrative base in the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Monash University, Australia. Each participating ambulance service is responsible for regulating case ascertainment, data capture and quality control. Data upload is web-based and is stored on a secure server at Monash University. Data are then recoded by Epistry staff at Monash University for consistency with the Epistry data dictionary and then combined to form the Epistry. An Epistry Management Committee (EMC) was established to develop processes and protocols, and oversee all ongoing aspects of the Epistry governance. The committee comprises representatives from each of the contributing ambulance services and Aus-ROC investigators. The Epistry consensus governance document guides the committee on the agreed use of the Epistry data; while maintaining data security and ethical principles.

Statistical analyses

Based on previously reported incidence of OHCA in our region,21 we estimate that the Epistry will capture approximately 14 000 patients with OHCA annually. We anticipate using descriptive statistics to summarise baseline characteristics and survival outcomes. Annual crude and age-sex-adjusted incidence rates will be calculated using population figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and Statistics New Zealand. Logistic regression will be used to investigate factors associated with key outcome measures with ambulance services as random effects.

Reporting

Publically available reports will be generated on an annual basis, in which ambulance services will be de-identified. As a component of quality improvement, benchmarking reports will be confidentially provided to each of the participating ambulance services comparing their risk-adjusted outcomes with the combined outcomes of the other ambulance services participating in the Aus-ROC Epistry. Findings will also be reported in peer-reviewed publications.

Discussion

The Aus-ROC Epistry was established with the aim of understanding regional, ambulance service and treatment factors associated with improved OHCA survival and outcomes. The scope of the Epistry will enable a range of important research questions to be answered, including understanding regional variations in outcome, the impact of variations in the provision of treatment for OHCA between ambulance services, temporal changes in incidence and outcomes, and the impact of changes in clinical guidelines and clinical trials, as well as increased clinical trial efficiency. The Epistry will allow risk-adjusted outcomes to be determined, to enable benchmarking across providers and identification of system-wide strategies associated with survival for patients with OHCA in Australia and New Zealand. Variations have been identified in the incidence and outcomes of OHCA across geographical regions in Australia21 22 and internationally.23–25 To improve outcomes for these patients, there is a need to identify the underlying causes of these variations, which may include differences in the underlying risk of OHCA, and ambulance service structure, function and resuscitation practices; or simply case definitions. For example, other multicentre cardiac arrest registries have investigated regional variation in: the incidence and outcomes of OHCA,23 26 27 temporal trends in survival,6 rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR),28 treatment and transport practices,7 and the association between receiving hospital characteristics and survival.29 The Epistry will serve as a framework to address similar questions and identify factors associated with regional variation in survival. The longitudinal nature of the Epistry enables pre-post studies to assess the effect of changes in practice, such as examining whether survival from OHCA improves following the implementation of guideline updates.30 The Epistry will also facilitate the evaluation of clinical trials by providing infrastructure to capture and combine prehospital and in-hospital data across multiple regions in a standardised manner. It is intended to eventually broaden the telephone assessment of quality-of-life (using validated instruments) of OHCA survivors that is conducted by the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry31 and in Aus-ROC clinical trials,32 and use this information to study patient-centred outcomes, as well as economic evaluation of resuscitation interventions. The Aus-ROC Epistry has been modelled on the successful ROC Epistry.4 In comparison to ROC who rely on data from 264 emergency medical service agencies,4 one of the strengths of Aus-ROC is the contribution of data from only six ambulance services. Individually, these ambulance services cover large geographical areas and populations, and represent both metropolitan and rural regions, facilitating understanding of variability in the ambulance service systems and the impact that such variability has on patient outcomes. When compared with other multicentre registries that capture smaller proportions of their relevant population, the capture population of the Epistry represents the majority of Australia and New Zealand and is therefore more likely to be representative of the broader population. With significant heterogeneity in the reporting of OHCA outcomes,33 another strength of the Aus-ROC Epistry is the ability to define consistent primary and secondary outcome measures to compare the effect of regional and ambulance service variations. Similarly, having a consistent and uniform denominator when defining incidence and survival in OHCA enables valid comparisons across regions. The sensitive nature of OHCA data, particularly for ambulance services, presents challenges when establishing multicentre cardiac arrest registries.34 These challenges include data ownership, access security and use. In establishing the Epistry, memorandums of understanding were developed between the lead academic institution and each of the participating ambulance services. These agreements, combined with the Epistry governance document, provide clear guidelines on the ownership, use and dissemination of Epistry data. Combining data from multiple regions has inherent challenges. Variation existed in the variables collected by each of the participating ambulance services, which reduced the number of core variables that were collected for the Epistry. However, it is hoped that over time, all participating sites will be able to collect additional variables, such as ‘neurological outcome’ and other resuscitation practices and interventions. A survey of the participating ambulance services is currently underway to evaluate variation in the treatment and provision of service between Epistry sites. This survey will also collect data on case ascertainment and quality control measures within each of the participating sites. Aus-ROC also has a vision to extend the current network of participating ambulance services to include all Australian ambulance services. While four Australian ambulance services not currently participating in the Epistry have been invited to contribute data (NSW Ambulance, St John Ambulance Northern Territory, ACT Ambulance, Ambulance Tasmania), these service-based OHCA registries are in various stages of development. It is hoped that these registries will be able to contribute data in the future, and thus the Epistry will capture the prevalence of OHCA in the entire Australian population—as is currently possible for New Zealand.

Summary

The Aus-ROC Epistry is a population-based OHCA registry with a capture region encompassing the majority of Australia and all of New Zealand. Combining OHCA data from six sites will facilitate an understanding of the factors that are associated with improved survival from OHCA and will allow monitoring of temporal trends in process and outcome. Furthermore, the Epistry provides infrastructure to enhance the coordination of clinical trials and improve collaboration between ambulance services, thus increasing capacity to improve outcomes of patients with OHCA in Australia and New Zealand.
  22 in total

1.  Closed-chest cardiac massage.

Authors:  W B KOUWENHOVEN; J R JUDE; G G KNICKERBOCKER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: an opportunity to align research prioritization and public health need.

Authors:  Joseph P Ornato; Lance B Becker; Myron L Weisfeldt; Barbara A Wright
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Rationale, development and implementation of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Laurie J Morrison; Graham Nichol; Thomas D Rea; Jim Christenson; Clifton W Callaway; Shannon Stephens; Ronald G Pirrallo; Dianne L Atkins; Daniel P Davis; Ahamed H Idris; Craig Newgard
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation and transport practices in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium: ROC Epistry-Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Dana Zive; Kent Koprowicz; Terri Schmidt; Ian Stiell; Gena Sears; Lois Van Ottingham; Ahamed Idris; Shannon Stephens; Mohamud Daya
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Quality management in resuscitation--towards a European cardiac arrest registry (EuReCa).

Authors:  J T Gräsner; J Herlitz; R W Koster; F Rosell-Ortiz; L Stamatakis; L Bossaert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies.

Authors:  Jocelyn Berdowski; Robert A Berg; Jan G P Tijssen; Rudolph W Koster
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Small area variations in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: does the neighborhood matter?

Authors:  Comilla Sasson; Carla C Keirns; Dylan Smith; Michael Sayre; Michelle Macy; William Meurer; Bryan F McNally; Arthur L Kellermann; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome.

Authors:  Graham Nichol; Elizabeth Thomas; Clifton W Callaway; Jerris Hedges; Judy L Powell; Tom P Aufderheide; Tom Rea; Robert Lowe; Todd Brown; John Dreyer; Dan Davis; Ahamed Idris; Ian Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Regional variability in survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the All-Japan Utstein Registry.

Authors:  Kohei Hasegawa; Yusuke Tsugawa; Carlos A Camargo; Atsushi Hiraide; David F M Brown
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Receiving hospital characteristics associated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Clifton W Callaway; Robert Schmicker; Mitch Kampmeyer; Judy Powell; Tom D Rea; Mohamud R Daya; Thomas P Aufderheide; Daniel P Davis; Jon C Rittenberger; Ahamed H Idris; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  8 in total

1.  The 10 fundamental principles of lay resuscitation: Recommendations by the German Resuscitation Council.

Authors:  Bernd W Böttiger; Burkhard Dirks; Ulrich Jost; Uwe Kreimeier; Stefan Osche; Markus Roessler; Karl Heinrich Scholz; Sabine Wingen
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Recent advances in personalizing cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Authors:  Cyrus E Kuschner; Lance B Becker
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-06-21

Review 3.  Developing a Pan-Canadian Registry of Sudden Cardiac Arrest: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Katherine Allan; Paul Dorian; Steve Lin
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2019-02-20

4.  To strengthen self-confidence as a step in improving prehospital youth laymen basic life support.

Authors:  Anna Abelsson; Per Odestrand; Annette Nygårdh
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-30

5.  Long-Term Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Utstein-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Enrico Baldi; Sara Compagnoni; Stefano Buratti; Roberto Primi; Sara Bendotti; Alessia Currao; Francesca Romana Gentile; Giuseppe Maria Sechi; Claudio Mare; Roberta Bertona; Irene Raimondi Cominesi; Erika Taravelli; Cristian Fava; Gian Battista Danzi; Luigi Oltrona Visconti; Simone Savastano
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Proceedings of the Second Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Shraddha Mainali; Venkatesh Aiyagari; Sheila Alexander; Yelena Bodien; Varina Boerwinkle; Melanie Boly; Emery Brown; Jeremy Brown; Jan Claassen; Brian L Edlow; Ericka L Fink; Joseph J Fins; Brandon Foreman; Jennifer Frontera; Romergryko G Geocadin; Joseph Giacino; Emily J Gilmore; Olivia Gosseries; Flora Hammond; Raimund Helbok; J Claude Hemphill; Karen Hirsch; Keri Kim; Steven Laureys; Ariane Lewis; Geoffrey Ling; Sarah L Livesay; Victoria McCredie; Molly McNett; David Menon; Erika Molteni; DaiWai Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; Soojin Park; Len Polizzotto; Jose Javier Provencio; Louis Puybasset; Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao; Courtney Robertson; Benjamin Rohaut; Michael Rubin; Tarek Sharshar; Lori Shutter; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Wade Smith; Robert D Stevens; Aurore Thibaut; Paul Vespa; Amy K Wagner; Wendy C Ziai; Elizabeth Zink; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.532

Review 7.  Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review.

Authors:  Marieke A R Bak; Marieke T Blom; Hanno L Tan; Dick L Willems
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Overcoming challenges of establishing a hospital-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry: accuracy of case identification using administrative data and clinical registries.

Authors:  Melanie R Wittwer; Mohammed Ishaq Ruknuddeen; Mel Thorrowgood; Chris Zeitz; John F Beltrame; Margaret A Arstall
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-05-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.