Literature DB >> 27048423

Legal Standards for Brain Death and Undue Influence in Euthanasia Laws.

Thaddeus Mason Pope1, Michaela E Okninski2.   

Abstract

A major appellate court decision from the United States seriously questions the legal sufficiency of prevailing medical criteria for the determination of death by neurological criteria. There may be a mismatch between legal and medical standards for brain death, requiring the amendment of either or both. In South Australia, a Bill seeks to establish a legal right for a defined category of persons suffering unbearably to request voluntary euthanasia. However, an essential criterion of a voluntary decision is that it is not tainted by undue influence, and this Bill falls short of providing adequate guidance to assess for undue influence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Academy of Neurology; Brain death; Determination of death by neurological criteria; End-of-life; Life-sustaining treatment; Undue influence; Uniform Determination of Death Act; Voluntariness; Voluntary euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048423     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-016-9718-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  1 in total

Review 1.  Palliative care, double effect and the law in Australia.

Authors:  B P White; L Willmott; M Ashby
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.048

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Stretching the Boundaries of Parental Responsibility and New Legal Guidelines for Determination of Brain Death.

Authors:  Bernadette Richards; Thaddeus Mason Pope
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.