| Literature DB >> 27048423 |
Thaddeus Mason Pope1, Michaela E Okninski2.
Abstract
A major appellate court decision from the United States seriously questions the legal sufficiency of prevailing medical criteria for the determination of death by neurological criteria. There may be a mismatch between legal and medical standards for brain death, requiring the amendment of either or both. In South Australia, a Bill seeks to establish a legal right for a defined category of persons suffering unbearably to request voluntary euthanasia. However, an essential criterion of a voluntary decision is that it is not tainted by undue influence, and this Bill falls short of providing adequate guidance to assess for undue influence.Entities:
Keywords: American Academy of Neurology; Brain death; Determination of death by neurological criteria; End-of-life; Life-sustaining treatment; Undue influence; Uniform Determination of Death Act; Voluntariness; Voluntary euthanasia
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27048423 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-016-9718-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bioeth Inq ISSN: 1176-7529 Impact factor: 1.352