Literature DB >> 27048306

Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial.

Seth Uretsky1, Edgar Argulian2, Azhar Supariwala3, Shiv K Agarwal4, Georges El-Hayek2, Patricia Chavez2, Hira Awan2, Ashadevi Jagarlamudi2, Siva P Puppala2, Randy Cohen2, Alan Rozanski2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because the frequency of cardiac event rates is low among chest pain patients following either performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) or stress testing, there is a need to better assess how these tests influence the central management decisions that follow from cardiac testing. The present study was performed to assess the relative impact of CCTA vs stress testing on medical therapies and downstream resource utilization among patients admitted for the work-up of chest pain.
METHODS: The admitted patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either cardiac imaging stress test or CCTA. Primary outcomes were time to discharge, change in medication usage, and frequency of downstream testing, cardiac interventions, and cardiovascular re-hospitalizations. We randomized 411 patients, 205 to stress testing, and 206 to CCTA.
RESULTS: There were no differences in time to discharge or initiation of new cardiac medications at discharge. At 1 year follow-up, there was no difference in the number of patients who underwent cardiovascular downstream tests in the CCTA vs stress test patients (21% vs 15%, P = .1) or cardiovascular hospitalizations (14% vs 16%, P = .5). However, there was a higher frequency of invasive angiography in the CCTA group (11% vs 2%, P = .001) and percutaneous coronary interventions (6% vs 0%, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Randomization of hospitalized patients admitted for chest pain work-up to either CCTA or to stress testing resulted in similar discharge times, change in medical therapies at discharge, frequency of downstream noninvasive testing, and repeat hospitalizations. However, a higher frequency of invasive coronary angiography and revascularization procedures were performed in the CCTA arm. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01604655.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary computed tomography angiography; chest pain, resource utilization; stress testing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048306     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0354-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  26 in total

1.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Harold I Litt; Constantine Gatsonis; Brad Snyder; Harjit Singh; Chadwick D Miller; Daniel W Entrikin; James M Leaming; Laurence J Gavin; Charissa B Pacella; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Associations between routine coronary computed tomographic angiography and reduced unnecessary hospital admissions, length of stay, recidivism rates, and invasive coronary angiography in the emergency department triage of chest pain.

Authors:  Michael Poon; Michael Cortegiano; Alexander J Abramowicz; Margaret Hines; Adam J Singer; Mark C Henry; Peter Viccellio; Jeffrey C Hellinger; Summer Ferraro; Annie Poon; Gilbert L Raff; Szilard Voros; Michael E Farkouh; Pamela Noack
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond Y Kwong; Gregg W Stone; Roxy Senior; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Jennifer H Mieres; Thomas H Marwick; Lawrence M Phillips; Farooq A Chaudhry; Patricia A Pellikka; Piotr Slomka; Andrew E Arai; Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; Todd D Miller; Eike Nagel; Abhinav Goyal; Salvador Borges-Neto; William E Boden; Harmony R Reynolds; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06

5.  Physiological correlates of densely calcified coronary lesions on coronary computed tomography angiography among patients with low-to-intermediate coronary artery disease likelihood.

Authors:  Seth Uretsky; Alan Rozanski; Azhar Supariwala; Surinder Khokhar; Prashanth Atluri; Salim Memon; George Dangas; Edward A Fisher; Steven D Wolff; M Robert Peters
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  James A Goldstein; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; Michael A Ross; Brian J O'Neil; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Risk stratification using stress echocardiography: incremental prognostic value over historic, clinical, and stress electrocardiographic variables across a wide spectrum of bayesian pretest probabilities for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Devi Gopinath; Siu-Sun Yao; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Leif E Peterson; Arup Achari; Craig M Pratt; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Christopher Pickett; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Todd C Villines; Sara Petrillo; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes.

Authors:  James K Min; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Amanda Gilmore; Ning Kang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  12 in total

1.  Extending the Use of Coronary Calcium Scanning to Clinical Rather Than Just Screening Populations: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Piotr Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Coronary computed tomography angiography: How should we act on what we find?

Authors:  Márcio Sommer Bittencourt; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Comparison of mid- to long-term clinical outcomes between anatomical testing and usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  In-Chang Hwang; Sol Ji Choi; Ji Eun Choi; Eun-Bi Ko; Jae Kyung Suh; Insun Choi; Hyun-Jae Kang; Yong-Jin Kim; Joo Youn Kim
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department: Contrasting Evidence from Registries and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2017. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Preventive Management of Nonobstructive CAD After Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Michael C Honigberg; Bradley S Lander; Vinit Baliyan; Maeve Jones-O'Connor; Emma W Healy; Jan-Erik Scholtz; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Pradeep Natarajan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

8.  Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-part I.

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Alexia Rossi; Marco Guglielmo; Marc R Dweck; Oliver Gaemperli; Koen Nieman; Francesca Pugliese; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Alessia Gimelli; Bernard Cosyns; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Sanket S Dhruva; Brandon Peterson; John M Mandrola; Daniel J Morgan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study).

Authors:  Ganesan Karthikeyan; Barbara Guzic Salobir; Borut Jug; Niveditha Devasenapathy; Erick Alexanderson; Joao Vitola; Otakar Kraft; Elgin Ozkan; Saket Sharma; Gaurav Purohit; Maja Dolenc Novak; Aloha Meave; Sergio Trevethan; Rodrigo Cerci; Sandra Zier; Lucia Gotthardtová; Tomáš Jonszta; Timucin Altin; Cigdem Soydal; Chetan Patel; Gurpreet Gulati; Diana Paez; Maurizio Dondi; Ravi Kashyap
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.